EPTShan't be modkilled.
Fruity Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Shan't be modkilled. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 07 2013 00:12 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Time to remind myself why I don't like playing these games. /in I'll try to be nice :I | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 07 2013 10:43 layabout wrote: Whattup VE! has risk.nuke rolled scum yet? ![[image loading]](http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/7780/alwaystownie.png) | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 14 2013 07:57 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Clear scumtell, scum. Only scum would claim to be town while not actually town. You mind as well confess now. I like that logic, I wish liking it made it true. On February 14 2013 07:38 Zessionar wrote: ##vote: risk.nuke he has a 26,66 % chance to flip scum. You on the other hand, I don't like one bit, nor your scummy shenanigans. Why do you want to randomlynch me? Furthermore why me rather then somebody else? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 14 2013 08:28 WeWinMafia wrote: Just a guess but I think the purpose of a random lynch is it being random. Why do you feel the need to even ask this when it's clearly bullshit he's doing right now? If you don't answer questions directed at other people you and I are going to get along. Zess, first of all. Nobody have ever called me decent scum. My major accomplishments as scum have been going temporarily unnoticed while some aggressive townies distracted the town with their pointy fingers and cries of omgus. He never claimed to have RNG'd me, he just stated the odds. What I find scummy is advocating lynching someone he doesn't suspect is scum and the fact his claimed reasons seems to be pulled out of his arse. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
So it's not unusual at all that Syllogism would ask sandroba what he thinks of something in order to help get a read on him or just simply because he wants his respected second opinion. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 14 2013 22:33 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I don't like Risk.nuke questioning posts that are obviously meant as a joke and taking them seriously (Zessioniar's initial vote), then defending himself by saying he's a poor scum player. What are you talking about, are we playing the same game? I questioned somebody who put their vote on me. How did you interpret his post as obviously a joke? Furthermore I didn't say I'm a poor scumplayer to defend myself. I used the empirical evidence that I hadn't performed well as scum to prove that his claimed reasoning was false or more to the point, made up. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 15 2013 01:25 yamato77 wrote: Why don't you think Zess likes you, and why is his opinion of you alignment indicative at all? Read his posts and tell me if you reach a different conclusion otherwise I can't really be bothered to copying his posts and interpreting them for you.. It's not. However making up reasoning is. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 15 2013 01:43 Zessionar wrote: ahm well... I already stated, that i am exagerating. Originally I wanted to vote for vivax, but i was afraid, he'd never stop his shitstorm if i vote him. I just wanted to start anything: Therefor i chose you, because you used to play slightly similar to vivax years ago. and to be honest, i didn't even think about if for more than 3 seconds... it's just not that important... Now I wrote like everything that went through my mind in this 3 seconds i decided to vote you... You might aswell call it random... Please let this be the last time i need to talk about this. We god better things going on. WeWinMafia, tell us who you are. I don't think you need to cover your identity in this game. you won't get shot anytime soon. Again, your words make no sense. If you're familiar with me my play was probably better years ago because while inexperienced I was still uncorrupted by my current lazy ways. And I don't believe you. You keep slightly contradicting yourself and changing your mind and you seem desperate to stop any discussion about you. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Hiro's reasoning is quite weak, and quite disappointing after he dropped his big vote now I'll explain later. The only one's reasoning that has a point is Layabout's. But even so I don't think the leap between bad and scum is that suspicious. I told myself that this morning I'd have figured out who I want to lynch but well. We have basically no performance from Obvious, Coag, Mattchew, Vivax, Grush. Pretty disappointing performances from Syllo, Sandroba and Marv who've done zero scumhunting. Are you still waiting for the game to start? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Earlier I felt like killing him and the only thing stopping me was the lurkers. My sentiment haven't changed. I will back a lynch on someone who've done jack this game. Otherwise ##Vote: Zessionar | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 16 2013 06:41 syllogism wrote: I'm not voting supersoft, even if it means no lynching. Just so you know This better be an empty threat or it's the most anti-town I've read all game. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Can somebody tell me why a townie would do that? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
##vote: yamato | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
##vote: yamato | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
And shit supersoft. you've changed to the worse. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
I made it pretty fucking clear how I felt about the lynch and why. yamato was first a weak bandwagon and when nobody wanted to actually discuss lynches people just fell back on him with some weak meta excuse which according to marv wasn't even accurate. What pissed me of last night was nobody could provide me an argument for why yamato was a better lynch then zess and still he had racked up the most votes. It felt like the easiest scumwagon ever. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 16 2013 20:02 Zessionar wrote: please go into detail. I think you're only referring to your own memory there without even reading what i've done in between. Your reasoning is terrible and you obviously didn't read the thread. Okey so you did not call me a bad townplayer and good scumplayer. And then changed your mind to I was a bad townplayer and a bad scumplayer? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
1 kp is not enough in this setup and I'm a bit dissapointed you didn't see that as obvious bugs. Gun dealer is a powerfull role and even if you could argue that scum have a chance to aquire it we're back to "dayvigs are hard to use" I could probably have played better but I had a very important exam today and with visiting a friend saturday and studying all sunday in between traveling so it was just awefull timing that I couldn't be more active when I apparently needed to be to not get dayvigged (something I did not see coming) I was planning to get back today and get into the lynch discussion. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 19 2013 02:10 Vivax wrote: What's a parity cop he checks someone and then someone else, then he gets told if the second person have the same or different alignment from the first. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
And yeah, if you disregard what i joked about in the mafiachat clearly I played this game as if I were shaking in my boots. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 19 2013 02:42 layabout wrote: so do we nominate ourselves for the bestest town award? i'm a bit annoyed i gave up on vivax so easily The mafia team led the bus on their teammate day1. No town discussion. + Show Spoiler + then throws away most of the cred they got by not participating in the crucial lynchdiscussion (wbg was right talking about fear but it just made them stick out all the more) Town luck out on randomised veteran placement. Then a dayvig shot another mafia. No town discussion. Then the third mafia shoots the fourth mafia and concedes. Town discusses which townie to kill. No you will probably not get a bestest town award despite flawless victory. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 19 2013 03:39 layabout wrote: risk toad was the only one that properly bussed yamato, But vivax's first vote was not a seriuos one and he backed out of the bus anyway, you did a desperartion switch. That was not a mafia lead wagon by any stretch. Hiro went after yamato, I fingered yamato, sandro and syllogism kept the wagon alive and town pushed it through at the end. fingered him for what? everyone just fell to a consensus on him without reasoning because he was an easy target. And my point is he could easily have been saved if he wasn't being bussed by toad and then didn't to show up to defend himself and some other useless lurker could had been lynched in his stead. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 20 2013 19:18 wherebugsgo wrote: you gave up when the game started, so no, that's not true at all. I think you're looking for excuses here. You're the one trying to excuse that your setup was heavily imbalanced. Give it a rest, your denial of this fact and continuous arguments and attempts to justify it is starting to piss me off. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
I know some hosts do this more then others to ensure the teams are as fair as possible. I also know some hosts as yourself dislike doing it. When a game is over, for a player there is nothing as frustrating as to look at a setup and see that it was heavily favored one way or another. More so if you were on the loosing side and put in a lot of effort. And favor doesn't just come from the setup, the players are also a factor. A hosts job is to make sure these frustrating scenarios doesn't happen. Knowing it was imbalanced and writing it of as bad luck because of the RNG isn't acceptable imo. You have a responsibility to your players to try to balance this game, and that should be prioritized before your code of never re-RNG. | ||
| ||
