EPTScum doesn't have a role cop in this game, so why do you think they assume you're a valuable blue and keep blocking you?
Newbie Mini Mafia XXXVII - Page 71
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
warbaby
United States510 Posts
Scum doesn't have a role cop in this game, so why do you think they assume you're a valuable blue and keep blocking you? | ||
|
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
| ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9389 Posts
You know I have asked several times now for a top scum read and why. Sylencia you have never delivered; and when you come out of hibernation its only to comment on what is matters to you... ##Vote:Sylencia In the scum game I played; we got the RB to block me.. to get town cred... i can see this happening here. (will be out doing house chores most of the day, be back in 6 hours) | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On February 16 2013 11:30 cDgCorazon wrote: So Sylencia, do you have any scum reads now that you're not about to be lynched? | ||
|
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On February 16 2013 13:54 Sylencia wrote: Corazon: I'm still sure that Warbaby is scum, potential slip during day 2, one of the weirdest statements I've read during day 1, and he's now also claimed I've fake roleblock claimed. Remember when you were scum and you managed to slip under the radar for another 3 days while we flailed around until the other scum kind of screwed up your plans? This is something I don't want to let happen again. | ||
|
Sylencia
Australia1057 Posts
On February 17 2013 10:47 Mocsta wrote: In the scum game I played; we got the RB to block me.. to get town cred... i can see this happening here. Yeah, I can understand it happening once - I was considering it myself when I was scum. But why twice? And as I just said, this is the exact reaction that the scum want from me having to claim RB twice. | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
| ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9389 Posts
On February 17 2013 10:59 cDgCorazon wrote: There are three scum, just in case you didn't know...WB cannot be your only scumread. On phone And why are you so certain? | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
| ||
|
Sevryn
698 Posts
On February 17 2013 10:11 cDgCorazon wrote: Well I doubt Sevryn is going to come out of his hiding place unless we smoke him out: ##Vote: Sevryn Tell us why we should lynch someone else and not you. I made a post about the other two lurkers my times I'm able to be on are a little different than most people but that doesnt mean I'm hardcore lurking mandalor is the lurkiest but syl is the scummiest IMO so if you want to smoke somebody out why woudlnt you go for the least active this seems to me almost like an OMGUS from the previous night and my posts about you. WB that is the deffinition of sheeping voting with someone without giving your own reasons I know you said you thought I was the scummiest but your whole case is cherry picking my filter I have made good constructive posts and you have just ignored them. you want me to go through your whole filter and post all the zero content posts? right now my current scum team read is 1.syl 2.Cora 3.wb in that order | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9389 Posts
On February 17 2013 11:31 cDgCorazon wrote: Because a set-up with 8 town and 5 non-town would be really imbalanced, and a set-up with 10 town and 3 non-town would also be ridiculously imbalanced. On phone: This is silly poo corazon. There have been several 13 player newbie games, each with 3 scum and never SK. You just said 10 town, 3 non-town is unbalanced... y? | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9389 Posts
On February 17 2013 13:15 Sevryn wrote: I made a post about the other two lurkers my times I'm able to be on are a little different than most people but that doesnt mean I'm hardcore lurking mandalor is the lurkiest but syl is the scummiest IMO so if you want to smoke somebody out why woudlnt you go for the least active this seems to me almost like an OMGUS from the previous night and my posts about you. WB that is the deffinition of sheeping voting with someone without giving your own reasons I know you said you thought I was the scummiest but your whole case is cherry picking my filter I have made good constructive posts and you have just ignored them. you want me to go through your whole filter and post all the zero content posts? right now my current scum team read is 1.syl 2.Cora 3.wb in that order Sevryn, i said before I think you're the voice that tries to stand up in the crowd and is then ignored. However, posts like the above; make me think you're just a lurker and make me realise how much you have blended in. When I read the above I think, you are either defending yourself; or trying to contribute without contributing. Regardless it is not helping town scum hunt. Step up and pressure your reads. If your #1 read is sylencia.. lead the way and show us why you think he is scummy. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9389 Posts
I said before, a case shows more about the maker, than the recipient. Is the above your case for warbaby? Is that the best you can muster? Why is this a contribution of merit compared to posts from Mandalor or Sevryn? Why should we believe you were even RB'd twice? You pointed out you said you were not blue, so i cant see why scum would RB you in the first place... and then why the heck would a JK target you over TestSubject. - All you have returned to us is WIFOM. This smells *really* fishy to me. I want some answers to the above. Let me remind you On February 17 2013 10:47 Mocsta wrote: ##Vote:Sylencia | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On February 17 2013 13:19 Mocsta wrote: On phone: This is silly poo corazon. There have been several 13 player newbie games, each with 3 scum and never SK. You just said 10 town, 3 non-town is unbalanced... y? When I say "non-town", I mean mafia + sk. Only having 2 mafia members is a coin flip: It would either be really hard for town to catch scum because they are so few in number (especially in newbie games because only half the people actually play and the rest just /in and never post on the thread again). It could also be hard for the scum because if the town does catch one of the scum, the other one has to survive multiple lynches and kill and talk his way into winning (which is really hard). It's a coinflip I don't think that the hosts would take. Can we be done talking about set-up stuff? | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On February 17 2013 13:15 Sevryn wrote: I made a post about the other two lurkers my times I'm able to be on are a little different than most people but that doesnt mean I'm hardcore lurking mandalor is the lurkiest but syl is the scummiest IMO so if you want to smoke somebody out why woudlnt you go for the least active this seems to me almost like an OMGUS from the previous night and my posts about you. WB that is the deffinition of sheeping voting with someone without giving your own reasons I know you said you thought I was the scummiest but your whole case is cherry picking my filter I have made good constructive posts and you have just ignored them. you want me to go through your whole filter and post all the zero content posts? right now my current scum team read is 1.syl 2.Cora 3.wb in that order It's not hard to say that Mandalor and Sylencia are scum. We are all suspicious of them. We're not going for the least active person, as far as I'm concerned, you all have the same level of activity: inactivity. We are trying to lynch the scummiest person, and I think it's you. We have three different regions in this game: USA, Australia, and Europe (and Lesotho). There is always someone on, and you can always post when people are asleep. I'm saying you haven't scum hunted because all your ideas are not original. For example, your arguments about me are taken from a general consensus that was given N1 (that my vote for Glurio was suspicious), and from what TestSubject had tunneled me all of D2 about. You haven't brought anything to the table. Taking other people's ideas and rewriting them as your own is not original content. It's looking like you are scumhunting without doing actual scumhunting. I've challenged you to make a case on me. All you have done since is run away and hide from my challenge. Why is that so? On February 16 2013 15:03 cDgCorazon wrote: @Sevryn: Can you bring anything new to the table in the argument against me? If so, I'd love to hear it. @all: Do you agree with my point about Sevryn's cases being unoriginal, or would someone else disagree? | ||
|
Sevryn
698 Posts
On February 17 2013 14:13 cDgCorazon wrote: It's not hard to say that Mandalor and Sylencia are scum. We are all suspicious of them. We're not going for the least active person, as far as I'm concerned, you all have the same level of activity: inactivity. We are trying to lynch the scummiest person, and I think it's you. We have three different regions in this game: USA, Australia, and Europe (and Lesotho). There is always someone on, and you can always post when people are asleep. I'm saying you haven't scum hunted because all your ideas are not original. For example, your arguments about me are taken from a general consensus that was given N1 (that my vote for Glurio was suspicious), and from what TestSubject had tunneled me all of D2 about. You haven't brought anything to the table. Taking other people's ideas and rewriting them as your own is not original content. It's looking like you are scumhunting without doing actual scumhunting. I've challenged you to make a case on me. All you have done since is run away and hide from my challenge. Why is that so? @all: Do you agree with my point about Sevryn's cases being unoriginal, or would someone else disagree? my case on glurio was unoriginal? Im not proud that I got another townie lynched but atleast I was trying to find scum | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On February 17 2013 14:19 Sevryn wrote: my case on glurio was unoriginal? Im not proud that I got another townie lynched but atleast I was trying to find scum That wasn't a case. You made like three points that could've explained the behavior of 5-6 townies... | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9389 Posts
As for. Sevryn I do not care for his last post. But the point u raise can be applied to many. And By itself is not scummy. Need to tie to other behaviour | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On February 17 2013 14:23 Mocsta wrote: Cora u were the one raising setup talk. I called u out for being misleading. Now u want to cease discourse? As for. Sevryn I do not care for his last post. But the point u raise can be applied to many. And By itself is not scummy. Need to tie to other behaviour I just wanted to make an answer and continue pressuring Sevryn. Would you like to discuss the set-up more then? | ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
| ||
| ||
