Day 1 Vote Count:

Oatsmaster (1): ~~Mocsta~~, ~~Mocsta~~, ~~Djodref~~, JieXian

Mocsta (0): ~~Mocsta~~, ~~Oatsmaster~~, ~~JieXian~~, ~~Yamato77~~

VisceraEyes (1): Snarfs

prplhz (1): Palmar, ~~VisceraEyes~~, ~~Mocsta~~

Palmar (2): ~~VisceraEyes~~, Djodref, ~~Oatsmaster~~, ~~Mocsta~~, JieXian

Yamato77 (0): ~~SlOosh~~, ~~Mocsta~~

Snarfs (1): ~~Mr. Cheesecake~~, ~~Oatsmaster~~, ~~Oatsmaster~~, VisceraEyes

Djodref (0): ~~jaybrundage~~

SlOosh (0): ~~Oatsmaster~~

JieXian (6): Yamato77, Phagga, ~~Oatsmaster~~, ~~Mocsta~~, Oatsmaster, Mocsta, Mr. Cheesecake, jaybrundage

JieXian is currently set to be lynched. slOosh has not voted.

You have 4.5 hours left until the end of the day.

phagga

Switzerland2194 Posts

February 07 2013 21:38 GMT

#702

On February 08 2013 05:36 VisceraEyes wrote:
The JX wagon popped up quick. FAST quick. I mean, this is like the end of the phase really with people going to bed.

Uh what? not even 4 hours ago the votecount looked like this:

On February 08 2013 02:12 Mocsta wrote:

UNOFFICIAL VOTE COUNT

Palmar (3) - Djo, Mocsta, JX
JX (2) - phagga, Yamato77
Snarfs (2) - Mr.CC, Oatsmaster
prplhz (2) - Palmar, VE
Djodref (1) - JayBrundage
VE (1) - Snarfs

No Vote (2) -sl0osh, prplhz

And that was AFTER some folks jumped away from JX again. Since then Mocsta, Oatsmaster, Cheesecake and Jaybrundage voted JX, which makes 6 votes out of 13 (or 12, if we take JX' vote away). How is that a fast quick wagon on JX? He has been discussed all day.

Also:

On February 08 2013 03:33 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'm willing to consolidate onto JX.

Is this still true? If not, what changed for you?

And:

On February 08 2013 05:12 VisceraEyes wrote:
I AM WILLING TO BET MY LIFE THAT PALMAR IS MAFIA.

Why? What differentiates his play this game from, say Death Note Mafia where he was town?

phagga

Switzerland2194 Posts

February 07 2013 21:40 GMT

#703

Bah, sniped again. Still, it's not like this is a completely uncontested lynch.

Also, where the hell is sloosh?

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 07 2013 21:52 GMT

#704

##Unvote: Snarfs
##Vote: JieXian

It's still true - it was just an observation. I wouldn't say he's been discussed "all day"...he doesn't even have enough content to warrant all-day discussion. And his resurgence into the thread when the threat of lynch is real certainly doesn't speak well for him either.

phagga

Switzerland2194 Posts

February 07 2013 22:02 GMT

#705

could you please answer my question regarding Palmar?

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 07 2013 22:06 GMT

#706

I didn't read Death Note. Tell me this: what motivation is more likely for a player who "isn't invested in the game" to come in and, while he doesn't have input on who we should lynch, tries to put the lynch off of the present candidate AFTER they've reached majority? Town or scum? Just remove the fact that it's Palmar from the equation, you'll come to the same conclusion I do.

phagga

Switzerland2194 Posts

February 07 2013 22:16 GMT

#707

His Filter, it's 5 posts.

hmm. Yeah right, I did not really take his last post into account, you got a point there.

Do I understand you right that you assume JX and Palmar are both scum then? What do you make of JX's vote on palmar then? I mean, from the point of the scum team it's a lose/lose situation if either of them gets lynched, why would he not try to get on prplhz or snarf (assuming at least one of them is town). Also, if what you say is true, palmars last post was tremendously stupid, as a red flip of JX will automatically shift towns attention on him.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 07 2013 22:21 GMT

#708

prplhz summarize your case against jay. All I see is a lot of convoluted summarizing his play. You didn't like something about his interactions with Djo?

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

February 07 2013 22:26 GMT

#709

Palmar is already going to have attention on him because he's promised some kind of "plan" to take advantage of scum nominations or something...he's lurked unrepentantly all of D1. Do you mean to tell me that you were going to let him do the same D2? What about D3 phagga? When does it end?

If he's town, his play is lynchworthy anyway - but he's not. I would think (or at least hope) that he wouldn't play a game like this as town.

jaybrundage

United States3921 Posts

February 07 2013 22:26 GMT

#710

On February 08 2013 07:06 VisceraEyes wrote:
I didn't read Death Note. Tell me this: what motivation is more likely for a player who "isn't invested in the game" to come in and, while he doesn't have input on who we should lynch, tries to put the lynch off of the present candidate AFTER they've reached majority? Town or scum? Just remove the fact that it's Palmar from the equation, you'll come to the same conclusion I do.

VE thats such bullshit. You ask a question and then follow it up with saying remove the fact that its palmar from the equation. Why the hell would you do that we are talking about Palmar.

You act like people cant be judged on different standards. I for one can look scummy as town. It has been a pretty consistent theme in my play. One that im trying to erase. But regardless its like saying that i look slightly scummy while taking away from the equation that sometimes i do that as town so we should lynch me.

IT IS PALMAR so why mince your questions.

phagga

Switzerland2194 Posts

February 07 2013 22:28 GMT

#711

On February 08 2013 07:26 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar is already going to have attention on him because he's promised some kind of "plan" to take advantage of scum nominations or something...he's lurked unrepentantly all of D1. Do you mean to tell me that you were going to let him do the same D2? What about D3 phagga? When does it end?

If he's town, his play is lynchworthy anyway - but he's not. I would think (or at least hope) that he wouldn't play a game like this as town.

It ends D2 (if he gets nominated), else D3.

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

February 07 2013 22:38 GMT

#712

@VisceraEyes Why are you so anxious to get rid of Palmar right now? No one said it could last forever. Why would we take the fact that he is Palmar away from the equation considering that .... he is Palmar?