Parallel World Mafia: Chaos of GreY

On December 11 2012 23:05 Palmar wrote:


I always read the OP

On December 12 2012 10:17 Foolishness wrote:
I don't even think it's worthwhile to bother with the swapping. Knowing Greymist there's probably random swaps every night whether we want them or not. We have to lynch someone, we figure out who. Other world should be figuring out who they want to lynch tomorrow.

Anyways I'm voting for marvellosity cause he's mafia.

##Vote: marvellosity

On December 12 2012 10:24 Foolishness wrote:

I have and I found a mafia. Look for yourself.

On July 17 2012 05:22 Foolishness wrote:
Everyone should ignore Mattchew. He's so far off topic that I'm even going to do this Ace style:

Ignore List:
Mattchew
Chezinu - does anyone honestly ever read his posts?

Syllogism is mafia. Non-committal stances, doesn't even want to defend himself. Someone needs to redirect that nuke at marvellosity. And the next time Kurumi uses the phrase "actively lurking" someone should shoot him.

And before someone asks, Palmar is town. Mafia never propose stupid things like random lynches day 1.

##Vote: syllogism

On July 17 2012 06:39 Foolishness wrote:

Day 1 nuke is a Kurumi-esque thing to do, but I've said that before about him when he's mafia. I want the nuke redirected at marvellosity because he's mafia.

On July 22 2012 09:12 Protactinium wrote:

Foolishness the CEO was stabbed to death with a broken coffee mug.

On December 13 2012 00:58 Clarity_nl wrote:
Yeahhh!

##Vote Foolishness

On December 13 2012 01:04 Crossfire99 wrote:
Marv and Palmar, do you really think Foolish is scum because of his vote on marv? Idk anything about foolish except that he is on the balance team, which I assume means he must be pretty good. Even if he did this bad vote as scum previously, do you think he would do it again? Personally, I don't feel comfortable voting for him just based on that.

On December 13 2012 07:36 Foolishness wrote:

He hasn't made a post longer than 30 words (most of them are just one liners full of nothing). He's not contributed anything of substance, all he has done is start a silly counter vote on me, backed by horrible reasoning. He says my vote is exactly the same as bureaucratic mafia, but it's not anywhere close. In bureaucracy, I just said he should die, I didn't give reasoning, and I don't even think I ever voted for him, I just made the comments in passing and never really elaborated on them. Poor comparison to try to get something going (though the amount of people jumping on it is great for the town).

What's most sketchy about his accusations against me is that they seem so out of the blue. He was really quick to jump up and point the finger back, so quick that it was made out of panic (oh shit he's onto me...quick! accuse him back to divert the attention!).

On December 13 2012 07:06 randombum wrote:
I dunno I just wanted to get a vote down and I made up something about the last person when i checked the thread. I suppose I could vote for myself, but that's no fun.

On December 13 2012 09:15 Foolishness wrote:
And I made all of 3 posts before you guys hopped on the train and the case against me is better?

On December 13 2012 09:14 Clarity_nl wrote:
Marv you baited him calling you scum so hard, man.

On December 13 2012 09:31 Foolishness wrote:

I did something extreme? He called me out on a bunch of bullshit cause he's a little butthurt

On December 13 2012 09:40 Foolishness wrote:

You flatter yourself thinking you're good at this game.

On December 13 2012 09:54 Foolishness wrote:

He posted 2 things, I got a bad vibe. nobody was doing anything productive. I wanted to get the ball rolling. You were conveniently gone. Wanted to save accusation of crossfire for later.

On December 13 2012 09:56 Foolishness wrote:

Are you a player who will draw attention to their own mafia team?

On December 14 2012 01:02 slOosh wrote:
marv, what does "Dieno is Dieno" mean?

##Vote (GreY): Crossfire99

On December 14 2012 07:05 austinmcc wrote:

You. Alignment? (Don't lie)

Thoughts on:

randombum
dienosore
rugby as an olympic sport
kenpachi


You missed me objecting to a statement and telling everyone that Palmar, slOosh, and Crossfire99 are NOT "anti-town elements." So they're good to go for now, and they're worth listening to, although we haven't had a lot of time since then. Otherwise, there have been no big "AHA!" moments.

On December 14 2012 07:09 slOosh wrote:
I figured I had two votes because of marv's ##worship early game, which is why I was leaning away from him. Pending results refers to a vote update, but now since marv is here I guess he can confirm / deny.

On December 14 2012 07:27 Crossfire99 wrote:
Marv, if no one was off the table, who would you want to lynch?

On December 14 2012 07:29 marvellosity wrote:


Well, you seem kinda interested so maybe you're town this game. sloosh for right now I think is town, Palmar is null.

So really it's between austin and kenpachi. I'm fine with a policy lynch at this point and I don't trust austin for his checks at all. I don't know if now it's just ME being paranoid, but his explanation that he'd have to check me by myself seems such a copout.

On December 14 2012 07:33 austinmcc wrote:

Pshaw. Look at the rest of my play this game. Or we can discuss my checks after this lynch/you can try to get me lynched/whatever. But you'll notice that the people who were around don't seem to be finding me scummy. At the very least, drop me for this cycle.

Besides, you know I'll check you by yourself later

On December 14 2012 07:33 Crossfire99 wrote:
Marv, did you see Keir's question for you in other world?

On December 14 2012 05:29 austinmcc wrote:
I don't think we should just no-lynch, assuming Foolish and Keirathi were the two scum.

I was less certain of Foolishness's scumminess than this thread, because ... the whole thing was just kind of weak. If he were scum, I'd expect some kind of defense because it was sitting right in front of him. Palmar wanted to know why Foolishness was doing what he was doing, and it would have been plenty easy for Foolishness to figure out the "town" answer and give that. He didn't. So I wasn't left being sure about his scumminess.

On December 14 2012 08:03 slOosh wrote:
marv, like I said I'm here on and off.

I'm not seeing where you are getting at with austin. Are you saying that town austin is usually paranoid about you and therefore would have no doubt included you in the check? I don't see much reason for scum to come in when town has no idea what to do after their main scum lynch was taken away, and then fake claim to offer up lynching guidance the way he did it.

I'm leaning Kenpachi as a lurker / unreadable lynch.

On December 14 2012 08:17 Dienosore wrote:
We lost our top read and the town was floundering. This sounds like the perfect time for a scumball to step in and start to influence people's opinions without looking too suspicious. What better way than create some vague detective check that no one can really confirm. It also creates the opportunity to give town cred to some names of his choosing.

I didn't feel comfortable voting for Kenpachi anyway. Even less once you guys mentioned he has a history of lurking. On the chance that I'm wrong about Austin and he does flip town, then we have three pretty much confirmed townies. If we are right and Austin is scum, then hurray scumball in a great position of power is down.

On December 14 2012 08:43 slOosh wrote:
Marv the extra vote doesn't come from you?

##Unvote
##Vote: kenpachi

On December 15 2012 00:12 Clarity_nl wrote:
What...... have you done??

On December 15 2012 00:39 austinmcc wrote:

The sad thing is that I'll play that game.

A one-way swap, possibly at random.

A lot of normal-y actions don't need to be popped in thread, so...either just you dicking around or something large, like a swap. All the other swap mechanics (bar Palmar) have been typed in thread.

On December 15 2012 01:21 slOosh wrote:
Hey marv could I have your updated read on austin? Still think it's bs or starting to see my way?

On December 15 2012 01:47 slOosh wrote:

You say that as if it was solely his fault that Kenpachi was lynched. Motivations are separate from results, and I don't think his motivations are scum driven. He carves out three people who cannot be lynched before him, which limits scum mislynch options and also drives lynch focus on himself if any of these three players look suspect. Plus there is the "let's just lynch him to confirm 3 people". All these things greatly diminish scum's ability to play, and the only upside to this whole thing is maybe "town credit" but that's like bussing your teammate before anyone starts suspecting them gives "town credit". The only way his play makes sense is if crossfire99 is scum, since the lynch was wavering and could have snowballed onto him, but I'm finding that austin's consistency / explanations outweigh that.

On December 16 2012 08:51 randombum wrote:
I dunno if I should respond in length to tear apart foolishness's read on me or just call him wrong.

On December 16 2012 08:59 Risen wrote:
Well it seems I'm forced to claim. Crossfire is my homie, but we can never be in the same world together

On December 18 2012 09:22 Risen wrote:
Took .5kp. Thank you whatever medic healed me last night since a red check with my ability does 1kp to myself. This confirms marv scum, as I targeted him last night.

##vote: marvellosity

It's not my fault I got the same role power again marv

On December 16 2012 10:05 Risen wrote:
My PM does everything but say he's town. If he's scum I'll be more surprised than I've ever been in a mafia game.

On December 18 2012 12:18 Risen wrote:
Btw I was roleblocked and took .5kp last night. Final answer.

On December 18 2012 14:31 randombum wrote:
Also, marv still could be a mafia, but either way I think he's anti town now.

After the dieno mis lynch:



Pretty much seems like he was like "nope, town ain't winning this"

On December 17 2012 08:46 marvellosity wrote:
I swear I'd posted a reply, but apparently not.

Basically I'm not convinced by any of it

And I think Mementoss is scum, he's one of the only people I filtered earlier and I don't see the town. I also noticed sandroba calling him scum.

Foolishness basically brushes off a mementoss read in his post, completely.

On December 19 2012 06:50 Foolishness wrote:
I claimed BH is town cause he is, just as I claimed dienosore was town and he was.

I explained what my role did and why I put it on Yamato, there was plenty good reason for me to do so.

I was right to think that there was something up with marvellosity, he pretty much claimed 3rd party. Assuming that he is 3rd party, he is still anti-town. You want to let him run around then you have only yourself to blame.

On December 19 2012 07:21 syllogism wrote:
Sloosh you should probably full claim tonight. Even if your role is awesome, which I doubt, you dying makes the game easier. I don't entirely trust austin's check and I need to narrow down possible candidates for the second mafia in Grey.

Marvel you also need to full claim your abilities. I'm not quite willing to believe that you don't know what your abilities do. How does it make sense for you to even use your abilities if you don't know what they do? It only draws attention to you if you are a survivor.

Also this doesn't make sense if you are a survivor with a standard survivor win con. The easiest way for you to win is by having either side win quickly.

On December 20 2012 19:30 syllogism wrote:
Marv what do you think your role in the other world would be

On December 20 2012 20:19 syllogism wrote:
The planar dragon had a standard town win con in the other world, so perhaps the same applies to you and swapping you there would be in town's best interests