|
On November 22 2012 06:32 kushm4sta wrote:
I didn't stealth vote, really. It's just that I forgot to use the voting thread before.
And yeah I am here lurking. I'm trying to keep up with the thread. It's hard.
Why aren't I posting that much?
Well I'm kind of lost. i haven't been reading super closely and this is my first game that's themed so heavily.
Any other questions? I love answering questions.
yeah whats wrong whats the deal usually your in everyones face and you do follow the thread why are you not?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
risk, it says right there in the post.
Come on now.
|
and who cares if the game is themed or not scum always be scum.
|
On November 22 2012 06:14 BioSC wrote:
--snip--
In some Bizzaro world where I was elected Party leader, those would be my choices on whom to accompany me, and why.
--snip--
Bolded for emphasis @ risk.
|
Awesome, if I can vote myself I'll vote myself.
##vote Toadesstern
|
On November 22 2012 06:35 marvellosity wrote:
risk, it says right there in the post.
Come on now.
I'm an idiot, I mixed things up. Carry on.
|
On November 22 2012 06:35 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 06:32 kushm4sta wrote:
I didn't stealth vote, really. It's just that I forgot to use the voting thread before.
And yeah I am here lurking. I'm trying to keep up with the thread. It's hard.
Why aren't I posting that much?
Well I'm kind of lost. i haven't been reading super closely and this is my first game that's themed so heavily.
Any other questions? I love answering questions. yeah whats wrong whats the deal usually your in everyones face and you do follow the thread why are you not?
I JUST answered that question. I don't know how I can answer it better.
|
On November 22 2012 06:41 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 06:35 iamperfection wrote:On November 22 2012 06:32 kushm4sta wrote:
I didn't stealth vote, really. It's just that I forgot to use the voting thread before.
And yeah I am here lurking. I'm trying to keep up with the thread. It's hard.
Why aren't I posting that much?
Well I'm kind of lost. i haven't been reading super closely and this is my first game that's themed so heavily.
Any other questions? I love answering questions. yeah whats wrong whats the deal usually your in everyones face and you do follow the thread why are you not? I JUST answered that question. I don't know how I can answer it better.
WELL im saying go read closely
|
also i have a sore throat
|
@Clarity
I give my thoughts on what we are doing (Electing a party leader, something we need TOWN reads for), and I give my reads on whom I believe are town right now. Are they based on little info? Yes. Can they change with newer/better info? Yes, but since I agree with what they've said so far, I haven't had a reason to color them red right now.
As for the quirp about not scumhunting while scumhunting, that's not what I said. I said, while the focus is on electing a mayor, we should at least try to elect a town. As I believe winning events is crucial to winning the game (almost as much as a lynch, since it is in place of one afaik.) Electing people I believe to be town and having them bring people I also believe to be town makes for a high chance of success. What's not to get?
|
marv how do you feel about cave's recent interactions with me, and sudden disappearance?
|
@ Marv
What do you think of bios town read on you. I think it is bs and it seems like to me it was a pre calculated move to come into the thread with. I dont see how anyone can drop a strong town read and i can see you easily saying that quote in his post regardless of alignment
Bios post also doesn't say much at all just that he doesn't have a problem what is going on.
Im thinking scum
|
On November 22 2012 06:45 BioSC wrote:
@Clarity
I give my thoughts on what we are doing (Electing a party leader, something we need TOWN reads for), and I give my reads on whom I believe are town right now. Are they based on little info? Yes. Can they change with newer/better info? Yes, but since I agree with what they've said so far, I haven't had a reason to color them red right now.
As for the quirp about not scumhunting while scumhunting, that's not what I said. I said, while the focus is on electing a mayor, we should at least try to elect a town. As I believe winning events is crucial to winning the game (almost as much as a lynch, since it is in place of one afaik.) Electing people I believe to be town and having them bring people I also believe to be town makes for a high chance of success. What's not to get?
your town read on marv is bs
|
On November 22 2012 06:45 BioSC wrote:
@Clarity
I give my thoughts on what we are doing (Electing a party leader, something we need TOWN reads for), and I give my reads on whom I believe are town right now. Are they based on little info? Yes. Can they change with newer/better info? Yes, but since I agree with what they've said so far, I haven't had a reason to color them red right now.
As for the quirp about not scumhunting while scumhunting, that's not what I said. I said, while the focus is on electing a mayor, we should at least try to elect a town. As I believe winning events is crucial to winning the game (almost as much as a lynch, since it is in place of one afaik.) Electing people I believe to be town and having them bring people I also believe to be town makes for a high chance of success. What's not to get?
Let me phrase the accusation in a question: what is it that makes you lean town on Marv?
|
On November 22 2012 06:47 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 06:45 BioSC wrote:
@Clarity
I give my thoughts on what we are doing (Electing a party leader, something we need TOWN reads for), and I give my reads on whom I believe are town right now. Are they based on little info? Yes. Can they change with newer/better info? Yes, but since I agree with what they've said so far, I haven't had a reason to color them red right now.
As for the quirp about not scumhunting while scumhunting, that's not what I said. I said, while the focus is on electing a mayor, we should at least try to elect a town. As I believe winning events is crucial to winning the game (almost as much as a lynch, since it is in place of one afaik.) Electing people I believe to be town and having them bring people I also believe to be town makes for a high chance of success. What's not to get? your town read on marv is bs
fine, I'll bite. How so?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 22 2012 06:46 iamperfection wrote:
@ Marv
What do you think of bios town read on you. I think it is bs and it seems like to me it was a pre calculated move to come into the thread with. I dont see how anyone can drop a strong town read and i can see you easily saying that quote in his post regardless of alignment
Bios post also doesn't say much at all just that he doesn't have a problem what is going on.
Im thinking scum
You've played way more games with me than Bio, though, who's played with me... once maybe? And certainly not for a long time.
The fashionable read on marvelbabe is that I'm hard to read day 1, and he didn't go with that so meh. I can see how if you're not familiar with my play that he could see what I said there as a towntell anyways.
I'd like Bio to say some shizzle on the more controversial topics, like his opinions on Cave/Denisore for example.
Clarity - Cave is still bad or scum or both, and the important thing is that he doesn't get invited on today's event.
|
You called an extremely bad plan bad, that gave him the townread, that's the sole reason he gave.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
why are you telling me? 
|
You think it's reasonable to come away from that with a towntell, as long as they're not familiar with you?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'm assuming there's a little more to it, but he can answer that himself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
