Chrono Trigger Mafia - Page 47

On November 22 2012 06:01 iamperfection wrote:

if you really want to figure me out go do some research and come back later. Also this day is half political campaign / scum hunting deal with it. I got some nuggets in there you just ignored them

so tl dr you shape up

On November 22 2012 03:56 BioSC wrote:
Good morning folks, glad to see the game has started in full swing. I've got a LOT to catch up on, see you in 20-30 mins.

On November 21 2012 17:33 syllogism wrote:
But getting a team together is not a collective effort; players only have to identify one likely townie who is also likely capable of identifying 3 additional ones. If I was a party leader, I wouldn't pay much attention to who most people think are town. As such I suppose it can be argued the possible party leaders should devote more time on town hunting, but everyone else should mostly just justify their party leader vote and spend the rest of their efforts on finding mafia.

Do you agree that it's easier to get reads if people post and explain their mafia reads than if they only talk about who they find to likely be town?

On November 21 2012 12:45 marvellosity wrote:


if i'm leader and i choose my strongest 3 townreads, why the fuck do I want people who aren't strong reads on my team? I chose those 3 people for a reason.

People will be discussing who should potentially be in any party anyway. No-one is prevented from doing this, so giving them some arbitrary power to choose doesn't add anything.

When it comes down to it, you want the 4 people likeliest to be townie in the party.

On November 21 2012 16:35 goodkarma wrote:



The reason we're not doing traditional scumhunting is because we don't have the power to lynch scum. Our time is best used determining who is most likely town, as we're (hopefully) voting for townies as party leader.

I've touched on this a few times. Hopefully this is the last time clarification is needed. This game isn't about scumhunting. Rather, it revolves around townhunting.


Hope that helps.


I see a couple people have questions for me. I'll make a followup post for them within the hour and then I'm calling it a night.

On November 22 2012 06:10 risk.nuke wrote:

How's it going?

On November 22 2012 06:07 iamperfection wrote:
i want to be on the team obviosuly

On November 22 2012 06:11 iamperfection wrote:
just not seeing the effort acro doesn't seem like to me that you really want to figure out my alignment

On November 19 2012 09:43 GreYMisT wrote:

---

Voting rules:

1. Voting is done in a separate thread. Please keep votes there, and only vote there. Do not PM me your vote.
2. Please vote in the following format: ##Vote Qatol. Votes not done in the correct fashion will not be counted. I will update vote counts whenever I get the chance.
3. No conditional voting.
4. You may vote for yourself. You may not vote for anyone dead or outside the game.
5. In the event of a tie the person with the most votes first wins (or loses).
6. Voting is mandatory. You may NOT abstain.

---

On November 22 2012 06:25 Clarity_nl wrote:


#4

On November 22 2012 06:16 Clarity_nl wrote:
I'm not that impressed Bio. A townread on marv, syllo, sand and the fact that we shouldnt be scumhunting, but we should.

On November 22 2012 06:33 BioSC wrote:


If you aren't going to read my one post, why should I be impressed with you?

On November 22 2012 06:14 BioSC wrote:


You sniped me...

On November 22 2012 06:14 BioSC wrote:
Kay, that took longer than I thought. You guys type too much.

Re-reading through the OP/Daypost, I firmly believe that it's in towns best interest to win each event. Hurp derp, obvious, I know, but the plans to intentionally put someone who's "questionable" on the team a bad idea since if he is scum, it may result in a lost event. I believe, at least for this cycle, we should be putting 4 people together who are most likely town to try an win this and every challenge. Should the event fail, then we can have a look at people on the team who are most likely to be scum and act accordingly.

Now, boiling away all the fat from the discussion, a few people have popped up for the leaders, both of whom I would have no problems electing as party leader, Syllo and Sandroba.

I'm liking Sandroba simply because I agree with his plan insomuch as picking town reads. The way he stated it and stated it early makes me have a town read on him early. I would, however, like him to at least let us know whom he plans on picking party-wise, so if he's elected party leader we can know his thought process behind each individual.

Syllogism for much of the same reason, simple plan of trying to win the events which I can get behind. This post in particular stuck out to me as why I would be ok with supporting him as well.



Finally, I would have supported Marv for party leader, but since he doesn't want it, it would be silly to vote for him. I do believe him to be town, based on his response to Chronic's plan:



We need the leader to be accountable for his choices, and rolling dice or random choice isn't the way to do that.

In some Bizzaro world where I was elected Party leader, those would be my choices on whom to accompany me, and why.

Another Note:



Scumhunting is always usefull. But, I agree to a point with this quote. We aren't lynching someone this cycle (That we know of), we are electing a Party Leader, which implys that we need to find town, hence, townhunting is important, at least for this cycle. In the end, however, we do need to find scum, so that town KP can be directed towards scum, and so that we DON'T elect them to the party at all.

I've got a couple more hours left before I leave to go visit with family and then I won't be back until late (Central US time).