EPTChrono Trigger Mafia - Page 333
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Acrofales
Spain18371 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18371 Posts
| ||
|
iamperfection
United States9647 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On December 07 2012 04:27 Acrofales wrote: Can we have a votecount please? No | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Lynch: risk.nuke (8): Hapahauli, Clarity_nl, Syllogism, Keirathi, Hopeless1der, Promethelax, Kitama27, adam4167 cavejohnson (2): Cavejohnson, goodkarma goodkarma (1): phagga phagga (1): oatsmaster Epoch: Middle Ages (10): Keirathi, Hopeless1der, syllogism, promethelax, hapahauli, oatsmaster, kitaman27, adam4167, goodkarma, Clarity_nl If you have not voted do so, there will be no more warnings. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On December 06 2012 11:19 Clarity_nl wrote: ##Unvote ##Lynch Risk.Nuke ##Epoch Middle Ages | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18371 Posts
##Lynch risk.nuke ##Epoch Middle Ages All the cool kids want to go to the middle ages. I don't care. | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9647 Posts
same as acro since we cant stay here i don't really care. | ||
|
CaveJohnson
278 Posts
| ||
|
TheChronicler
Macedonia260 Posts
On December 07 2012 05:20 Acrofales wrote: Oh, I forgot to vote? Thought I had done so with the case. ##Lynch risk.nuke ##Epoch Middle Ages All the cool kids want to go to the middle ages. I don't care. Yeah uhh.. same. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Middles ages is fine with me. Staying within the 600/1000 band is where I'm most useful, although I don't have anything specific mentioning a rainbow shell or helping to craft anything. ##Lynch: risk.nuke ##Epoch: 600 AD | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
I don't particularly want to chance that someone can mess with my target by knowing who it is. | ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
I looked back through his filter and made notes of all the stuff that stood out in one way or the other. I'd like to shortly discuss a few points: D1: His play started with an attempt to setup speculate, followed by a lot of one liners, which leaves a negative impression. He does pick it up a bit later on, but generally his D1 play does not look that nice. There is some softdefending of syllo, which could be done as either alignement. What is bothering me a bit is that he is voting Sandroba, stating that Sand is a strong town player, but then admits that he does not have a strong town read on him. Toads: He votes Toad when everyone wants to lynch Toad, thus avoiding the self-claimed 500 damage that Toad might have taken. There is no real town motivation for this. His explanation why he did it is just really bad, and gets worse if I read it in context and remember where town stood at that point. He also starts making theories about Toad being Town where there are 2 redchecks on him. He then defends this theorie until toads dies. I was screaming "scum!" for this originally, but in hindsight I don't see how scum would have benefited from such behaviour. He might have derailed the thread a bit, but that's it. I don't really see any other benefit, as he even said himself that Toad needs to be lynched in any case after 2 red checks. He did bring himself into the spotlight with this and was heavily scrutinized, I don't think that he would have wanted that as mafia for practically zero benefit. Also, he is stubborn on the topic, which is under this circumstances rather a town tell than a scum tell. Downplaying his own play: On D2/D3 he repeatedly laments that he will get mislynched anyway because his play is so scummy. This sounds like he wants to get compassion for his play, which looks inherently scummy. I never really liked that at all. Recent play: Somewhere around the Toad lynch is play has improved. He looks interested what's going on. he still has content-less one-liners, but at the same time there are posts like this that show his invested in the game in a townie way. He has a nice case on z-boson, followed by a short interaction with Hapa about it that both feel rather genuine. Especially considering his later game, I no longer see Hope as scum. I am still wary of him for his early play, but I think there are far better lynch candidates than him. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18371 Posts
On December 07 2012 05:24 CaveJohnson wrote: We still have the sandwich to discuss you know... What's there to discuss? You are claiming that if you use it on someone in the party we cannot fail the event. That seems ridiculous. However, I don't see much harm in it either. I am not opposed to having Prom on a party and if the party fails, you are next on the chopping block. It's pretty simple. | ||
|
CaveJohnson
278 Posts
On December 07 2012 06:10 Acrofales wrote: What's there to discuss? You are claiming that if you use it on someone in the party we cannot fail the event. That seems ridiculous. However, I don't see much harm in it either. I am not opposed to having Prom on a party and if the party fails, you are next on the chopping block. It's pretty simple. Fine with me | ||
|
CaveJohnson
278 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Search doesn't seem to want to pull it up in your filter but I thought I remembered at least something before this last cycle. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
| ||
