Newbie Mini Mafia XXXI - Page 45
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
On November 30 2012 01:01 Oatsmaster wrote: OH SHIT YAMATO JUST FORGOT TO MENTION KICKSTART. SCUM TEAM. Why would I mention kick when I'm having a conversation to him about who he should make a case on? Why does everyone think I'm on a scumteam? | ||
Sonic Death Monkey
Sweden991 Posts
On November 30 2012 01:00 Kickstart wrote: What in the world are you talking about SDM. Yuor reaction is so far from town thinking I'm thinking it might be scum thinking. | ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
On November 30 2012 01:04 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: Yuor reaction is so far from town thinking I'm thinking it might be scum thinking. EXPLAIN. | ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On November 30 2012 01:00 yamato77 wrote: Then we lynched a lurking town D1 because he didn't put in enough time to play the game properly, and then we lynched a blue D2 for playing so terrible up the point of his claim that there was NO REASON to believe what he said when he claimed. If that's true, two town players have basically screwed over their own wincon. If we don't lynch him, who is the alternative? Jacob? Me? No one thinks CC is worthy of further inspection? What about Helo and Aqua? Are either of them worth suspicion? Is SDM's inconclusive play D2 helping town? His one and only case was one he backed off of D1. So you guys choose. Lynch Oats or find his potential scumbuddy. My vote sticks with him until someone else makes a case I can honestly get behind. The bolded parts look really scummy, who thinks of wincon in a situation like this? yamato also just names all the players without saying anything about them. Again FOR WHAT? | ||
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
On November 30 2012 01:04 JacobStrangelove wrote: Hey I am just looking though potential possibilities. And yes that isn't helping oats. I just find it hilarious that everyone's mention of association cases involves me. Seriously? I could definitely make an association case on Kick and CC but it's bad and I'm not going to mention it just to mention it. This is the kind of posting that makes people think you're not really playing, just kinda watching, which doesn't really help town. It doesn't hurt it either but I think you should put your notes together and make a fucking case. | ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
Sonic Death Monkey
Sweden991 Posts
On November 30 2012 01:00 yamato77 wrote: Then we lynched a lurking town D1 because he didn't put in enough time to play the game properly, and then we lynched a blue D2 for playing so terrible up the point of his claim that there was NO REASON to believe what he said when he claimed. If that's true, two town players have basically screwed over their own wincon. If we don't lynch him, who is the alternative? Jacob? Me? No one thinks CC is worthy of further inspection? What about Helo and Aqua? Are either of them worth suspicion? Is SDM's inconclusive play D2 helping town? His one and only case was one he backed off of D1. So you guys choose. Lynch Oats or find his potential scumbuddy. My vote sticks with him until someone else makes a case I can honestly get behind. First thing we need to decide if we should counterclaim. If yes: If counterclaim = lynch Oats Otherwise = calm down and find scum hunt again. | ||
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
CAUSE IM TELLING HE TRUTH | ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
On November 30 2012 01:06 Oatsmaster wrote: The bolded parts look really scummy, who thinks of wincon in a situation like this? yamato also just names all the players without saying anything about them. Again FOR WHAT? Who thinks about wincon? What kind of stupid question is that? Am I not supposed to care about how to win? I name all the players to demonstrate the LACK of real cases against them, not to make them. All of our alternatives to lynching you are hilariously bad. | ||
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
However we lose doctor and our most town posters will die later. | ||
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
On November 30 2012 01:10 Oatsmaster wrote: Well I say we scum hunt because no one will counterclaim CAUSE IM TELLING HE TRUTH In that case we should counter claim because no claim would prove you right. Unless we don't have a doctor but the likely hood of a role block hitting the right target would be insane. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Then if you are town, arnt you also screwing your wincon? My win-con is to find scum and lynch them, I dont know about your wincon but claiming seems to be the best way to find scum since I am in this situation already | ||
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
Kickstart
United States1941 Posts
| ||
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
| ||