EPTor they are scum udddies
dont worry rhough he is scrub
Mario Mini Mafia - Page 24
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
or they are scum udddies dont worry rhough he is scrub | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9647 Posts
On November 14 2012 00:57 Blazinghand wrote: Marv doesnt unseratand ghe ZB case or they are scum udddies dont worry rhough he is scrub ...phone i hope | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 14 2012 00:42 Blazinghand wrote: lil iamperfection im gonna talk down @ u till u get on my level cause else how u gonna hear me from down there lol On November 14 2012 00:43 Blazinghand wrote: no disrespect though cuZ ur voting well On November 14 2012 00:53 Blazinghand wrote: so what's the delal with hopeless this is not the town BH play I am familiar with. It's pointless. BH is capable of making lighthearted posts as town and indeed does so, but he does so while clearly pursuing his agenda and making his feelings clear. Town BH doesn't ask "so what's the deal with Hopeless'", he wades in with a strong opinion. Scummy. | ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
| ||
|
debears
United States2516 Posts
On November 14 2012 00:58 marvellosity wrote: no, making some case on Z-Boson doesn't make him town. this is not the town BH play I am familiar with. It's pointless. BH is capable of making lighthearted posts as town and indeed does so, but he does so while clearly pursuing his agenda and making his feelings clear. Town BH doesn't ask "so what's the deal with Hopeless'", he wades in with a strong opinion. Scummy. Any reference games off the top of your head? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
Marv you dobt know me man yku dont know me | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
iamperfection
United States9647 Posts
On November 14 2012 01:00 marvellosity wrote: Rock Band or Whose Line are recent town games of his. do you know any of his scum games? the search function isn't helping me find all his games. | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
That should pretty much handle the vast chunk of shit I got the last few pages. There are, however, some things I'd like to point out during these last events, though: First thing to note is how uncharacteristically bad BH's case is against me. He's basically saying I'm bullshitting with every post I make. While I agree my posts are not the bestest they can be, I'm not sure why that implies I'm scum. He says this one thing in particular though: ZB is setting up to look good as a wagon starter (since scum don't like to stick their necks out) and appear to contribute to town, but if you read his astonishingly short filter, it's clear he's not actually helping. He's flinging shit at the wall and hoping it sticks. Note two things. 1) He's saying I'm setting up to look good as a wagon starter. This is balls-to-the wall dumb. How am I a wagon starter just for having the first vote? Also, as he himself noted, I did not write a full essay regarding why I think SnB is scum. I voted for him for implying that he is town, and that's basically it. If I wanted to become a "wagon starter", that's obviously the exact opposite of what I should do, I would make a much more elaborate case. Ironically, I could say the same about BH and his case on me, and with much more validity, as he actually goes deep in his case on me, and seems somehow certain of my alignment, something which he leaves very clear later on: ...I actually want to lynch ZB, and ZB is actually scum.... Now, I'm not scum, so in my pov he is pretty much full of shit with this remark. There's a difference between bad logic, the thing he is calling me on bullshitting, and actual bullshitting, which is what this "wagon starting" remark actually is. 2) He's saying my filter is short, and it's clear I'm not helping. Again, completely ironic and hypocritical. He has only three completely useless posts up until this one: On November 13 2012 15:38 Blazinghand wrote: Honestly I think it's bad to tie yourself down with ideas like that. If someone's playing scummy, they're playing scummy. My scum play isn't amazing, but due to my extreme sex appeal and enormous intelligence and penis, I can assure you that it's improved a great deal. Mostly it's due to my large penis-- it is quite a monstrosity. It works as a pad, even. Back on topic, don't feel like you can't vote or push people because of possible contributions. This kind of play is lazy and puts preconceived notions of what certain players are worth ahead of behavioral analysis. Someone voting for me because they legitimately think I'm scum and they have the cojones to do it is infinitely more helpful to town than someone not voting me because I'm a sexy baller. That being said, iamperfection's vote is pretty typical iamperfection throwing his vote around trying to pressure people but not doing it effectively. He needs to realize that you should vote people when you want to lynch them, or else you won't be taken seriously. The second paragraph is completely fluffy, he's not actually saying anything. That being said, I would like everyone to pay attention to the bolded on the third paragraph. He heavily, heavily thrashes me for being weak on my vote on SnB. Let's ignore all the others, especially DP (who voted TWICE on SnB, without saying anything). Let's focus on what he says here on iamp - and this is important. He says that iamp is throwing his vote around to pressure people, and that's all A-ok. Now pause and think here. I'll quote what he said about that on me for clarity: ....S&B's "accidental" "vt claim" (both of those are in question) could be suspicious. But Z-B doesn't explain why. He doesn't set up a scum motive. He just slaps down a vote and bails. This is a chance to look like a townie wagon-started without doing analysis or writing the kind of long posts that could reveal his own scum motives. When Hapa rightly calls him on it ..... and ....A town player would lay out his own thought process right away so that others understand what he's thinking. He'd respond to s&B and push the wagon, not just slap down a vote and a bad explanation..... Now contrast that to what he said about iamp's voting. On iamp, he is completely casual regarding his voting. On his case on me, however, he's aggressive and incisive , as you can clearly tell from the quotes I posted above. Why does this make him scummy? Because it shows clear signs of fabrication, as one can easily infer from the quotes above. His views on "casual voting" are in complete contrast. One more thing, that I ignored earlier. If he feels so strongly about me voting SnB without giving any reasoning or thoughts, why isn't he going after DP, who's actually done that not once, but TWICE?? Townie Motivation: none. Scum motivation: he feels threatened that I have claimed miller and people are not showing signs of doubt on my claim. tl;dr 1) Blazinghand's case on me is uncharacteristically bad. It's also not consistent with his townie play on Liquid City. Look at his progression on Shiaopi, who was incidentally also making uncharacteristically bad cases as well. 2) Blazinghand is being supremely inconsistent, contradictory and hypocritical of what he defines as scum-motivated and what not, showing signs of someone who is merely fabricating cases, as detailed above. I tried to be as clear as possible here, because I don't want people to feel like this is just OMGUS. My votes on SnB and debears were more pressure votes, as if that wasn't pretty much clear. This one on blazinghand, is not. I think he's the best lynch so far, as everything I've stated seem to point on him being scum. ##Unvote ##Vote Blazinghand | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On November 14 2012 01:02 iamperfection wrote: do you know any of his scum games? the search function isn't helping me find all his games. idiot cop mafia and Resistance tunnel rats Mafia off the top of my head. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On November 14 2012 00:34 debears wrote: @Hopless <----when u get back Here was my post on clarity that you mentioned earlier. Now here's your post talking about my opinion on clarity How was that one post on clarity "unfair". This sounds like an emotional defense of Clarity, which you have no reason to do as town. Also, since it's early d1, we have to start from somewhere? Is it the greatest accusation in the world? No. But we can build from that Also, Clarity's posting was similar to his scum game at that point imo, along with the active lurking. Why wouldn't I point that out? If I call someone out early d1, it usually means I want to see more out of them. There was no vote. There was no "OMG clarity is scum guyzzzzz!!!!" Why were you so eager to try and discredit my opinion by saying "unfair"? @debears - That's my fault for putting words in Marv's mouth. I thought that was the intention behind: On November 13 2012 10:44 marvellosity wrote: you can't active lurk in a game that's less than 2 hours old, numbnuts. If anyone's 'active lurking' it's me. Put that in your pipe and smoke it. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 14 2012 01:09 Blazinghand wrote: When I get home I'll address that travesty againsf the human language that ZB thinks is a case but is in fact and OMGUS best do so, I'm down with it right now. ##Vote: BlazingHand | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
 | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
| ||
