|
On November 08 2012 07:10 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 06:58 thrawn2112 wrote:On November 08 2012 06:53 Promethelax wrote:On November 08 2012 06:52 thrawn2112 wrote:On November 08 2012 06:43 Promethelax wrote:On November 08 2012 06:42 thrawn2112 wrote:
i believe acro's claim Why? What do you think about mine and Risk's? Why don't you read the thread? I thought he was town before the claim and it matched up ok with other things that have heppened in the thread Risks's and yours mean nothing, anyone can claim vt lol No seriously, why haven't you been reading the thread? Did you have blue reads on me or RIsk, did anything change for you because of those claims? what do blue reads have to do with anything? what kind of accusation is "why haven't you been reading the thread?" honestly, what helpful answer could you possibly hope to obtain from that . and no i didn't have blue reads on either of you, especially not risk. and like I said, vt claims mean absolutely nothing, if you don't realize how that works then go look at the end of D2 again. I don't like your reaction, I asked because I wanted to see your response but what you have given me is defensiveness and no answer. This has been a trend for you this game and the fact that you get defensive about it instead of feeling bad about it reads as a scummy mindset to me and not a townie one. Green claims mean that we can't fake claim other roles if we are getting lynched. That is why they matter. More Set Up Speculation Ummm....I know we aren't playing C9++ really but if we were: 3 M = 1 1shot and 1 full JK 3 B = 1 1shot and 1 full Role Blocker 1 C = 1 1 shot cop that is all seven roles with no T so, in normal C9++ we would have Goon + Roleblocker + Godfather but no SK, now I know this doesn't follow those rules per se but that seems like a good system to base our ideas on, the thing is that for an SK to be present we'd need one T which would mean that one of the 1-shots doesn't exist, either Fuba or Thrawn would be scum and I'd vote thrawn before fuba.
No. Actually only need 2 Ms and 2 Rs for 1shot and full of each. I read that wrong too when I was hoping to get a vig to claim. We're actually only up to 5. Could still be 2Ts, however that does not jibe with the KP on N1, meaning we're missing either a full vig or a 1-shot something-or-other. Or WBG shuffled it up and because jailers are stronger than medics, he is following the cop-structure for jailers, meaning we're at 1T. Yay for another level of setup wifom.
As I said, claiming was fucking stupid. It serves no purpose for scumhunting and it was stupid of everybody to want it. Go feel ashamed if you were a townie who wanted mass claims in a normal game.
|
Oh fuck me, I did misunderstand that.
too much set up speculation. I'm done with it.
Acro, does Thrawn not reading the thread and getting defensive about it but having no reason for it seem scummy to you?
|
Actually, still doing it wrong. For the KP to work out with the claims so far, we'd have to have:
- CDDBBVV: A full vig hiding somewhere. That would put us at 0Ts and happiness. However, the only one who can claim vig with any hope of being believed is Release and I don't see much difference between him claiming vig and SK: either way town controls his KP and if we find 3 scum and the game isn't over, he was an SK.
- CDDDBBT: mkfuba being a full jailer. However, I believe his 1-shot claim or there is no reason for him not to use it N1.
- CCDDBBT: thrawn being a full cop. This would actually be a rather clever roleclaim.
- CDDBBVT: a 1-shot vig hiding in the shadows somewhere
- CDDBBMT: a miller <-- didn't claim, so doesn't exist
- CDDDBBT: bugs following the cop/vig-rules for jailers
WIFOM AWAY!
Going DOWN to 3Ts removes the Godfather from the equation, so that is not possible according to the list. This makes me more likely to believe Thrawn's claim. Guess at least something good came out of it.
|
Yo Kush, what do you think of the newly claimed roles?
I have a sneaking suspicion it's Innocent Wabbit. It just feels more bugsy.
Yo risk, are you scum?
|
![[image loading]](http://amultiverse.com/files/comics/2010-10-22-Mother-Of-All-Bunnies.png)
Is this risk.nuke?
|
On November 08 2012 08:19 Acrofales wrote:
Yo Kush, what do you think of the newly claimed roles?
I have a sneaking suspicion it's Innocent Wabbit. It just feels more bugsy.
Yo risk, are you scum?
well i knew you weren't vt lol.
prome's vt claim. it's believable since marvin acme isn't really a character.
risk's claim: it sounds like a vt name but im not reading too much into it.
|
On November 08 2012 08:48 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2012 08:19 Acrofales wrote:
Yo Kush, what do you think of the newly claimed roles?
I have a sneaking suspicion it's Innocent Wabbit. It just feels more bugsy.
Yo risk, are you scum?
well i knew you weren't vt lol. prome's vt claim. it's believable since marvin acme isn't really a character. risk's claim: it sounds like a vt name but im not reading too much into it.
yo dog, remember when you said you were sure I was blue?
|
On November 08 2012 02:02 drazak wrote:
I'm, working on a case for risk being scum, I'll post more about it in a few hours when I'm not so busy
The case. Give it to me!
|
Acro: the fuk is that image? My brain is bleeding.
|
im in class, so responeses may be choppy.
Should i still claim?
|
On November 08 2012 09:06 Release wrote:
im in class, so responeses may be choppy.
Should i still claim?
claim. Fully and with any actions you may or may not have.
|
second opinion? especially acro if he made it home from work?
|
|
|
you said this was "fucking stupid"
|
Ah. So what is YOUR opinion of a mass claim?
|
not useful because we have no confirmed setup. i was thinking bluehunting, as has been said.
Can't exactly call out scum if someone doesn't conform to the c9++ / w/e setup
|
I'd also like to hear what you think of the three new claims.
|
so what now everyone is using kush's theory? acro are you on board with it? (your risk posts)
|
Release, are you a vigilante?
|
On November 08 2012 09:26 thrawn2112 wrote:
so what now everyone is using kush's theory? acro are you on board with it? (your risk posts)
Not his theory, I honestly only really care about the roles. The names are an interesting side game to play but have very little impact on the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
