EPTAcme Mini Mafia, Inc - Page 11
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
| ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
On November 14 2012 13:22 thrawn2112 wrote: how did you decide which of me/fuba to vote for? you are acting extremely sure that i'm scum, but when i read the two of those cases i don't really see anything suggesting which read you're most interested in pursuing or why Well if you see my recent long post, clearly, i chose you. He made an innocuous remark and you pounce. He clarifies, and you pounce on something else. | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
I didn't get too far but with the possibility of rb me: Lynch thrawn --> RB me --> live happily ever after if no shot? or RB someone else (no one shot probably) --> lynch me --> RB prom --> DP dies --> kush and fuba point fingers and prom is the ultimate decider of the game. | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
| ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
##vote: thrawn | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
| ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
On November 12 2012 17:27 thrawn2112 wrote: mmm i don't think i like a release lynch. i'm having the same issues with it now as I did before.. he's way too open with his thought processes for me to think he;'s scum 2 times "my thought process is too open" On November 13 2012 13:43 thrawn2112 wrote: My thoughts haven't changed much. Prom = confirmed town ofc, I also think that kush and dp are town. I was wary of fuba but release has been on my radar all game, and his new name claim stuff is hard to believe. He said he originally claimed something else in order to silence the vt flavor discussion... I don't see how claiming a name that doesn't fit with the theory would make people talk less about the theory. ##Vote: Release Sooo... on radar --shows open thought process--> no vote and still on radar and on radar --brings up flavor--> votes me for flavor (i see a need to justify himself when all others were very content to simply agree and bandwagon) BUT On November 14 2012 11:32 thrawn2112 wrote: i think I want to lynch mkfuba. Every point in this game where I've thought about lynching release, I always hit a roadblock because he is extremely open with his thought process and it's be really difficult to keep that up as scum This is en extremely wish washy post... all I really get from it is that you think release might be a null read. I'm really doubting the high number of blues we have, and on top of what I've already said before about fuba, his claim is the hardest to accept. He only claimed a role that makes him responsible for 1 roleblock, and there could be any number of reasons why a scum fuba would have known that it would be a safe claim to make. The breadcrumb was basically non existent. Also, wtf kush I thought you thought I was town all game long... this is how easily you're willing to switch your vote? 3rd open thought process and dubious of my scumminess. Says fuba is scummy and keeps his vote on me. Explain that? I'm sure you can show us an open thought process too. | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
| ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
| ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
If i get voted, you claim i was scum. If i don't, the roadblock worked. Lunch out. | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
On November 15 2012 06:54 kushm4sta wrote: What I don't get about this game is why almost every fucking town had to LIE about their role?? Release I don't get why you would LIE just to get me to stop talking about flavor.. that doesn't seem realistic. If thrawn flips town, my next suspect is release. I have 5 minutes: Because you continually talked about flavor even after you said you would stop and i said that i would take any more flavor from you as a scum claim. | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
I'm out | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
I'll stick with Fuba and his excuses. | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
As long as the flavor theory held, you would have a tenable reason to continue talking about it. So i claimed something that i believed broke the flavor theory, and you therefore, were supposed to have no reason to continue to talk about it. | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
PDNSAAYAANIYDKWIATA | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
1) I don't have to be confirmed town. I'll never be confirmed town until i flip. But if your far-fetched theory (based on wbg's comment) had some reason to be doubted, i thought you and others would stop talking about it. 2) because other people werent ignoring them | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
Any excuse i make will be frowned upon. | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
| ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
On November 15 2012 11:51 DarthPunk wrote: Sorry for being absent. I was just in the most epic hour of mafia ever. Release you stopped caring about cases. You were pushing FUBA and then you sheeped the thrawn case and stopped contributing all together. What made you change your mind to thinking thrawn was scummier than Fuba? remember that post made by fuba about my case = null but I'm still scum(last part implied and clarified later)? Thrawn jumped on that way too hard, without giving fuba a chance to clarify. | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
On November 14 2012 12:38 Release wrote: + Show Spoiler + On November 13 2012 08:03 mkfuba07 wrote: So... lynch Release? On November 13 2012 08:04 mkfuba07 wrote: ##Vote Release On November 14 2012 11:01 mkfuba07 wrote: I'm still going through thrawn's filter (sorry I'm so slow, I'm not even sure I'll be adding much to what DP said), but I'm not sure what to think from Release's big cases. He hasn't given up despite the fact that we've made it clear that we're lynching him, which initially made me inch back towards town. The problem is that scum would probably do that as well. The situation feels similar to when I switched off of drazak earlier this game. The fact that I know his entire case against me is incorrect doesn't make me sway either way, as I think it could be made by town or scum. I guess a summary would be... initially townish, but in the end null. On November 14 2012 12:06 mkfuba07 wrote: I see nothing wrong with my post. It explains my reasoning. His cases had little impact on my thoughts of him. How is my claim the hardest to accept? My claim leaves an indication that something has happened. I said I jailed prome, and prome was roleblocked and didn't die, which I maintain was a likelihood N2. This is supported by the fact that there were 0 deaths. Your claim is impossible to verify at all. You crumbed a role that you could fakeclaim as scum with no possible downside unless you claim the bulletproof sk is town, and which leaves no evidence that anyone did anything. If I was scum roleblocker, why would I claim 1-shot jailer? It doesn't make any sense. Yours is the easiest fakeclaim. You say there could be any number of reasons for scum me to know what the SK was doing N2? Please name one. And breadcrumbs are non-indicative of alignment. Anyone can crumb anything. If I was scum planning on fakeclaiming, I'm pretty sure I'd be MORE likely to have a well-written crumb. Anyway, I trust prome, and I trust DP. If the scum wasn't release, it would have to be thrawn. I'm up for a lynch on either. The order is irrelevant to me. ##Unvote ##Vote thrawn2112 This may be slightly motivated by a need to be right when I called thrawn scum N2. At first i saw this as an inconsistency(scum --nochange-->null?) but upon further inspection, I see it as poor word followed by clarification (scum --(case=null)nochange--> still scum). However: On November 14 2012 11:32 thrawn2112 wrote: i think I want to lynch mkfuba. Every point in this game where I've thought about lynching release, I always hit a roadblock because he is extremely open with his thought process and it's be really difficult to keep that up as scum This I immediately recognized as a desperate attempt to capitalize on something rather insignificant: The post is far to unclear as to whether the null refers to me or the case i made (it was actually the case) and Thrawn automatically makes it out to be me, something that would imply the guilt of Fuba without giving fuba a chance to clarify(which he did in the next post) and you immediately switch to something else to implicate fuba. here | ||
| ||
