EPTLooney Lynching Mini Mafia - Page 78
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 19 2012 05:09 kushm4sta wrote: The supposition that either djo or me has to be scum: this is simply ridiculous. And the fact that you are holding onto it like gospel makes no sense. If you notice anyone else voting hopeless1der in R3, do let me know. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Ok right now I consider the following 100% true, I don't see any loopholes. One of the following statements MUST BE TRUE. A) there is scum among kush/djo B) town hopeless took the lead against ON on accident without scum interference C) if hopeless is scum then for some reason scum decided they'd rather have hopeless in the finals instead on ON B is completely possible. Why would scum interfere if they didn't need to? Why are you having such a hard time believing that town could have wanted 1der to go through over ON? 1der did things to merit a scumread. ON was just a null read afker. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 19 2012 05:17 thrawn2112 wrote: eh I guess, that's the weakest part of the case. also none of that is confirmed unlike that logic case I made against you in our newbie, so you know how hesitant i'd be about following through on it. "hopeless looked weird enough to get votes from town" is a true statement..... but it was the most contested MU and it's the only MU where we have a confirmed scum and a confirmed town so I don't just want to.... ignore it We have a confirmed scum. No guarantee hopeless1der is townie, but he does come out of that matchup looking good. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
1 austin 2 djodref 3 mementoss 4 kushm4sta 5 hopeless1der 6 thrawn 7 hiro 8 da0ud list is obviously adjusted so that da0 and the replacement won't get lynched | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
Why would 2 town try to push hopeless through? So they can advance a scumread over a null read. Thrawn who do you want to lynch? It's not even like you are having trouble deciding between a few people. You just seem completely 100% baffled. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
If you were obsing a game, and you saw someone make posts like this: On October 17 2012 09:16 austinmcc wrote: Other options include worries about a medic, although apparently I don't look super duper town, blue-sniping on ET. On October 17 2012 10:52 austinmcc wrote: One reason I'm thinking power roles of some sort exist: night actionS. When I have received all night actionS night actionS. If they're ALL submitted early. We have not seen rb claims. We have not seen medic protects. However, we've only seen 1 KP per night, and the N1 posts make pretty clear that there were multiple actions to be received. Moreover, Sandroba made it to R4 in D1. That means he didn't look uber-town. Yet scum chose to kill him. Why? He's been known to be a dangerous scumhunter. If scum killing him was the only action, I would expect it to happen EARLY. He was killed because they were afraid to let him live, and killing him early in the night would be better than giving him time to get some night thoughts out. So the fact that night didn't end almost immediately means that scum killing sandroba was probably not the only action that needed to come in. On October 18 2012 05:50 austinmcc wrote: Still believe we have night actors. No way are kita/jingle being super sneaky in constantly saying "actionS" and "all actions" if nobody is taking night actions. Stay hidden. plus lots of concern over who got NKed and why they got NKed. What is one conclusion you might come to about that person? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On October 19 2012 05:27 kushm4sta wrote: You just seem completely 100% baffled. qft. fucking lynch mechanics... everything is so much easier to read when it's a simple majority/plurality lynch. this whole game i feel like people haven't been talking about scumreads, adn they've been arguing over who is scummier out of small groups of people In retrospect, we should have talked about voting policy a lot more than we did. I think somebody mentioned it, but we should have figured out a way to turn every lynch into some sort of majority rules type of thing. I suggest something like that for the next voting system if it's not some fucked potato thing. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 19 2012 05:36 thrawn2112 wrote: if I see someone constantly building cases off of night kills and useless arguments concerning role speculation? that they're scum for having so many thoughts about that shit Wrong conclusion. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On October 19 2012 05:36 thrawn2112 wrote: if I see someone constantly building cases off of night kills and useless arguments concerning role speculation? that they're scum for having so many thoughts about that shit I'm not speculating about roles. Roles exist. I'm blue. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
| ||
