|
On October 19 2012 05:39 kushm4sta wrote: @austin if you are going to claim, then claim. I don't want to claim the particular role, because reasons.
I'm also probably being dumb about this, but oh well. That still seems to be my MO concerning blue roles.
|
On October 19 2012 05:41 austinmcc wrote:Show nested quote +On October 19 2012 05:39 kushm4sta wrote: @austin if you are going to claim, then claim. I don't want to claim the particular role, because reasons. I'm also probably being dumb about this, but oh well. That still seems to be my MO concerning blue roles.
are the reasons that you don't want to be counterclaimed?
|
lol kush what do you make of this
|
@austin if there is no way to confirm your claim it's worth close to nothing.
|
On October 19 2012 05:42 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 19 2012 05:41 austinmcc wrote:On October 19 2012 05:39 kushm4sta wrote: @austin if you are going to claim, then claim. I don't want to claim the particular role, because reasons. I'm also probably being dumb about this, but oh well. That still seems to be my MO concerning blue roles. are the reasons that you don't want to be counterclaimed? No. That's not what I'm worried about.
|
austin, what would be your response to someone claiming blue if you previously suspected them of being scum?
|
To me it seems like a fake claim. We have seen no evidence of a blue role. Obviously it's one that has actions, since he was talking about night actionS, so why has no one claimed any of those actions.
The "breadcrumbing" by arguing about NK also seems fake.
I still want to lynch until he has some way of corroborating his claim.
|
On October 19 2012 05:45 thrawn2112 wrote: austin, what would be your response to someone claiming blue if you previously suspected them of being scum? It depends on the person? That's not a blanket thing.
Sometimes I believe claims, sometimes I don't. If it's a claim likely to get counterclaimed, or that can be disproven by a counterclaim, I'll almost always believe it (single boxer setups for GSL Opens, Liquid City's "these roles all exist" bit).
That's not really a question I can give an answer to that you want, unless it's just rhetorical and you're saying you don't buy it at all and it doesn't change your mind.
|
It is somewhat rhetorical... trying to let you, if you're town, see the position I'm currently in
|
this is fucking stupid it's been 3 people arguing for like 3 hours now
someone else get in here there are plenty of things to have thoughts about
|
On October 19 2012 05:07 kushm4sta wrote: Time to go on the lynch Austin campaign trail
@hopeless1der Where is your townread of austin coming from? I see your biggest scumreads are djodref and daoud. From this it seems that you are very harsh on newbies, even though you have done some newb scummy things yourself. I implore you, reconsider what you think is scumminess might just and probably is newbness. Can you see a newb acting how daoud is acting? I can. Djodref: look how easily he posts, not his big cases, but the little ones in between. He has no fear of slipping up, no fear of sharing what's on his mind.
I never said I had a town read on austin, he's just low in my list because I'd rather lynch into da0ud first and didn't want austin picking up stray votes along the way. MMT and austin were at each other's throats for a while, VE sees scummy scum scum from austin, but again, I'm not comfortable with my read of him. I'd rather wait another day and give VE some time to hopefully hammer some sense into the thread after that D2 debacle. I have a scum read on da0ud and a scummy read on djodref.
After Austin's case on you, I have lots more connection theories to pursue, and now that he semi-claimed, I have even more reason to want to keep him alive. I expect him to deadline his claim post in the event he gets NK'd tonight, unless this lynch turns silly. For today, I think that if you are scum, one of da0ud and djodref is also scum. In fact, I'm moving you to #2 and djodref down to #3.
1-da0ud 2-kushm4sta 3-djodref 4-VisceraEyes 5-thrawn2112 6-mementoss 7-austinmcc 8-hopeless1der
|
On October 19 2012 05:51 thrawn2112 wrote: It is somewhat rhetorical... trying to let you, if you're town, see the position I'm currently in Sure, you can make of it what you will. But I need to start ramping things up if people are still on me, especially given that so many people have dropped votes (with me towards the top) and haven't been around for a good while.
|
sigh... if I'm to be intimidated into not voting for austin then I have almost no clue who I'm going to vote for
|
@ thrawn what is intimidating you... you should admit this is the shittiest claim you've ever seen. No way to counter claum, no evidence of blues. What blue could he be? It has to be something with a night action but we have seen no evidence...
|
well I'm awaiting further developments.. I assume eventually he will actually claim.
This is the first time I've seen someone just claim blue so I dunno what to think about it
|
On October 19 2012 06:08 thrawn2112 wrote: well I'm awaiting further developments.. I assume eventually he will actually claim.
This is the first time I've seen someone just claim blue so I dunno what to think about it If I have to I'll fully claim. I think this is probably a bad way to go about doing this, but oh well. It's done now.
Driving home, back available in 20 or so.
Still think today's lynch should be kush or djo, still leaning kush.
|
On October 19 2012 05:58 Hopeless1der wrote: VE sees scummy scum scum from austin, but again, I'm not comfortable with my read of him. I'd rather wait another day and give VE some time to hopefully hammer some sense into the thread after that D2 debacle.
So you don't trust him but you want him to hammer sense into the thread?
After Austin's case on you, I have lots more connection theories to pursue
Don't do it. Connection theories are bad.
|
On October 18 2012 04:32 kitaman27 wrote: Day Three Votecount
28 da0ud 28 austin 25 hiro 16 kushm4sta 14 hopeless1der 14 Djodref 10 mementoss 9 thrawn2112
In the event of a tie that cannot be broken by the first player to reach critical mass, we will remove the most recent vote and re-tally, until a winner has been decided.
Unofficial Votecount
46 austinmcc 38 djodref 38 kushm4sta 34 da0ud 34 visceraeyes 33 thrawn2112 31 hopeless1der 31 mementoss I did not work out the tiebreakers since austin was leading
|
kush who you wanna lynch 2nd? and it's prob not gonna be me
|
thrawn,
also there's the D1 vote sharing. his justifications for doing it were good, but I just don't see how he could have arrived at the point to do it in the first place. He only spent 1 vote until the finals, then used 3 out of his 9 votes for a candidate which, at the time he voted, needed a shit ton of votes to get lynched. Looks like hiding. It just doesn't seem like something a town player would do. the whole deal does strikes me as "guys i'm not gonna take a stance on anything, here i'm gonna let you use my votes because i'm so town" You think I just made those justifications up? If you don't, you think that I had those justifications as scum, "I'm gonna let you use my votes because I'm so town." You think I'd trade a scum buddy, who was going to be replaced by scumVE, for some town cred?
Also, keep that last bit of your quote in mind if I have to full claim.
|
|
|
|