Vicera. We'll never figure out Mattchews alignment. He deserve to be modkilled but that's not in our hands. Every single other player we're going to get better reads on with time with one exeption. Mattchew. Which makes it neccersary to lynch him in itself. Furthermore he's playing his scum-meta of lurking/notcaring. Try tell me why someone else is a better option.

We're lynching him today.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 13 2012 13:37 GMT

#2848

I have a friend visiting over the weekend, I've just barely skimmed over the last pages.

The only smart thing to do today is to kill Mattchew.

We need to get rid of Mattchew because.
He is likely scum.

So we have to lynch him sooner or later. The only scenario we don't end up sooner or later lynching Mattchew is if we decide that hey, his retarded actions are probably indicators that he is town so lets not lynch him... ever.

That scenario is never going to happen. Never fucking ever. Ergo we need to kill him.

Why is it better to kill him now rather then later?
Because as the game progresses we will be able to get better reads on everyone. Just as how you have better reads on other people day 1 then day 2. This makes it sub-ideal to lynch person x today and Mattchew tomorrow rather then lynch Mattchew today and person x tomorrow. This is NOT fucking complicated but the fucking ESSENCE of standard logic now start fucking voting.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 13 2012 14:21 GMT

#2850

How is Shiaopi comparable to mattchew?
Shiaopi is a scummy fuck who we compare against other scummy fucks and have nothing whatsoever do to with the point of my last post.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 13 2012 15:10 GMT

#2851

Can you start voting Mattchew so I know you understand and can stop feeling nervous you will botch this simple thing up.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 13 2012 17:38 GMT

#2866

VE then where did the kp go?

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 16 2012 10:20 GMT

#3259

Hard choices.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 16 2012 14:53 GMT

#3277

With VE claiming the only investigative role in the game it makes it likely his claim is legit.

Not sure about kreb's claim. It's pretty meaningless. I'm leaning towards him fake-claiming.

Still thinking about who I want to lynch the most.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 16 2012 15:07 GMT

#3281

Coag. Godfather... I've almost played 20 tl games. I have never played (or seen) a game with a godfather without investigative role. The only exception I can recall ever seeing was a semi-closed setup with 4 potential setups in which one of the setups included gf without investigative roles so mafia couldn't tell what power roles the town had.

The odds are VE is town.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 16 2012 15:10 GMT

#3283

How do we know that?

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 16 2012 15:47 GMT

#3287

On October 17 2012 00:12 iamperfection wrote:

Show nested quote +

plus bc's fake claim gives credence to the fact that luck citizen is a town role.

The list is of potential roles. Not existing ones. Proof is that the miller role was removed.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 16 2012 20:21 GMT

#3302

Because I bite.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 16 2012 22:20 GMT

#3307

share them.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 16 2012 22:28 GMT

#3310

I trust you absolutely zero. What you propose is in my eyes somewhat close to madness. However you added "I have my reasons" which indicates you know something I don't which I must assume is information that will turn your madness logical.

I'm waiting, this is not something you can back out of.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 16 2012 22:49 GMT

#3316

I was struggling between Sloosh and Shiaopi.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 16 2012 22:56 GMT

#3320

Your problem is Vicera is the only one with a believable claim. Due to anti-investigative mechanics in a closed role setup.

Kreb's claim is both very convenient and very unlikely from a setup perspective. I'm puzzled here to say the least.

Iamperfections claim is late and unbelievable. Atleast if he's claiming what I think he's claiming.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 16 2012 22:57 GMT

#3321

Agreeing with Coag, you better have something for there to be a chance I'm buying.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 16 2012 23:01 GMT

#3323

And even if your claim is true. You want to lynch Viscera based on your speculation of what that one-liner post ment?

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 16 2012 23:02 GMT

#3324

Kreb, Shut up.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

October 17 2012 00:53 GMT

#3382

Darth, It's not that simple.

Look at it from Visceras persective if scum.
Fakeclaiming detective at that point would have be stunningly retarded. From counterclaims to suspicions. The risks are high everywhere and the gain little. And my instincts tell me viscera is town.