EPTtell me what your interpretation is of why everyone is voting you? what reason do you think these people have?
Liquid City Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
tell me what your interpretation is of why everyone is voting you? what reason do you think these people have? | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On October 02 2012 09:55 Sharrant wrote: On Annul No reads on anyone. @Annul What do you think would be a better situation for a lynch? I'm assuming Kush is up there, but who else? these are two contradictory statements lol right now i have caught a few people in either blatant contradictions or OMGUSing or whatever. but the worst offender is someone who literally says "let's lynch someone i think is green." why people are moving off of that is beyond me. the fact he has some meta that has him saying this as a town once shouldn't let him off the hook now for a terrrrrrrribly red comment | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On October 02 2012 09:55 VisceraEyes wrote: Strange time to take issue with that, considering the push for austin...but you know...to each his own. What's your read of austinmcc annul? i didnt think that push was actually serious. if you really want to know my answer to this, then give me time to focus his filter | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
other than soft defending kush, he seems greenish to me. i believe he believes he caught KJ in a blackslip or something, and he had a timely recant when presented with evidence showing his belief was misguided. nothing else he said warrants a twilight push, imo. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On October 02 2012 10:05 kingjames01 wrote: I don't like how quiet the game has become now that Shady Sands is the leader. yes, this is exactly why i think he is not red. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
okay, fair enough. i grant you this. "That's a very different statement." no. it is the exact same conclusion: an extremely red comment that should be punished. "What I do find more damning is that you are misrepresenting what he says in your case on him. Why is that?" the answer to your question ("why?") is because my "misrepresentation" falls to the exact same conclusion as his "actual" statement. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On October 02 2012 10:57 kushm4sta wrote: wait wait why are we voting shady if he hasn't voted yet and will probably be replaced?? guys got a point | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On October 02 2012 11:19 Risen wrote: I don't exactly like drawing the conclusion that easy lynches = not scum. Maybe that is what scum wants you to think? I understand not wanting to waste a lynch since Shady is apparently to be modkilled, though. this isnt an equation i am arguing. its what i am arguing this time it just seems... off. yeah, dont vote shady if he's going byebye anyway | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On October 02 2012 11:19 VisceraEyes wrote: "Hey scumbuddies Marv and austinmcc, how can we save our scumbuddy ShadySands from imminent lynch?" -scumVE "I've been hoarding this Node case since he made his second post. I was afraid to post it but..." -scumAustin "DO IT!!!" -scumVE and scumMarv in unison "But what if they..." "DO IT!!!!" SCUMSLIP VOTE VE | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On October 02 2012 11:23 VisceraEyes wrote: Twilight pushes are scary to oppose as scum annul - because at that point, if there are enough people agreeing with it, then they're drawing A LOT of attention to themselves in trying to protect a scumbuddy. I mean, I don't know what you're counting as "resistance", but honestly since it's all happened in the last like 10 minutes, what kind of resistance are you expecting from scumbuddies? its not that i am expecting resistance from scum its that i think it might be the red team leading the wagon onto a known townie to protect a potentially dead red. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
obv not | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
On October 02 2012 11:36 VisceraEyes wrote: Well I mean...I went and checked the vote thread... Anyway, I get what you're saying...do you think it's austin? You just gave a greenish read on him. What are your thoughts on Marv? And if Node is such a "known townie" then why was the wagon so easy? I'm just trying to figure out where the problem is here...do you like Node for a lynch candidate or not? Time is of the essence, hence the fast votes - it didn't happen out of nowhere, people have expressed displeasure with both his content AND his activity. What are YOUR thoughts on Node EXCLUDING the events of the last 20 minutes? ill read marv filter after i eat this cookie. and i am NOT arguing for node's color one way or the other on any type of substantive case. that is, i am not basing my claims on what he himself has said or done. i am basing it based on circumstances revolving how everyone else is voting for him. it just does not make sense. a bus in this situation is a terrible play for the red team i think... and so based on the rush of votes, he is probably not red. as for a substantive case against node, ill read that filter closely after marv's | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
1. defends kush 2. starts the node wagon rolling 3. heavy focus on meta three things i dont like. but otherwise reads like town to me. perhaps this changes soon, dunno. | ||
| ||
