• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:33
CEST 00:33
KST 07:33
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview16Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7
Community News
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event12Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster12Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week4Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer12
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview Hybrid setting keep reverting. Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster HSC 27 players & groups
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29) $200 Biweekly - StarCraft Evolution League #1 SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps BW General Discussion Soma Explains: JaeDong's Defense vs Bisu NaDa's Body
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - WB Finals & LBR3
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Social coupon sites
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
NBA General Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Game Sound vs. Music: The Im…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 675 users

Death Note Mini Mafia - Page 16

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 14 15 16 17 18 52 Next
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
August 31 2012 22:21 GMT
#301
I'm not talking about lynching lurkers now. I'm talking about lynching you.

And you have yet to convince me why your case isn't the scummiest thing in the thread.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
strongandbig
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States4858 Posts
August 31 2012 22:24 GMT
#302
On September 01 2012 07:17 BlackMamba24 wrote:
Hapahauli actually found a huge contradiction on page 12 and it seems off to me too. If he really thinks policy lynches are that dumb (Like I do) why would he make suggestions or explanations in support of it? "If people are proposing a lurker lynch, I think we should come up with a list that a majority of us can agree on and then RNG it using some method." The whole tone of that sentence seems completely off to me for someone who doesn't like policy lynches in the first place.

Also, the miller claim. It basically protects scum from the DT. If you get DT checked you'd return scum in stead of self-aware miller so nobody can confirm it until you're dead and it gives you a point of argument if you do get DT checked. I need to go over his first post a bit closer but

By the way can we please not lynch or FoS people for being absent from the thread until certain times? I normally wake up between 2-4 PM PST and am quite busy most of the day so keep that in mind.

Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 04:59 marvellosity wrote:
On September 01 2012 04:47 strongandbig wrote:
On September 01 2012 04:25 marvellosity wrote:
ok it's not been discussed at all, but it keeps being pushed.

s&b seems to think that Mamba's case which is full of crap is less scummy than Hapa's pressure vote on Hopeless1der, and it makes no sense to me at all. He says he's not happy to vote someone based on one bad case, but is extremely happy to be suspicious of Hapa pressuring Hopeless.

Why this disparity?


Marv you were obsing ptp. VE and wiggles both made cases that were just as crappy as this one, I called them both scum, and they both flipped town. I just am not convinced that making bad cases is a good scum tell anymore. Like, does his case push a scum agenda or sew confusion? No, to me it just looks bad.

It is weird that blackmamba just disappeared. If he leaves his vote on hapahauli without making a new case then he'll jump to the top of my scum list.



And one other thing - I had been looking at hapa's vote on hopeless as "I think you are scum and want to kill you." That's how I vote - if I vote early in the day like that, I expect everyone to understand from that "I really mean what I'm saying right now, I'm serious about it." Like I said last time, it makes no sense when you think of it as meaning that, but when you change how you're thinking of it to a "pressure vote" it sounds better.




Alright. You and ghost were both doing the same thing effectively so the explanation is reasonable.

I don't wanna lynch Mementoss. He's cute.

The thing with Blackmamba - the case was bad, ok. But if it was to cause discussion, then fine. Except he hasn't been around to actually deal with the discussion, and I find that scummy.

I'd fucking love to policy lynch Zentor but annoyingly I can't quite bring myself to

##Vote: Blackmamba24


Because only scum sleep in late or get sinus infections.


I don't think there is a clear disconnect in the way Marvellosity sees MrZentor. If, in his mind, he thinks lynching Zentor is a good idea he's going to be biased and find and see things that support that preconceived notion. I'm guilty of building connections based on bad cases or even people I wasn't really that suspicious of because I want to be right. It's something that happens. I think SNB's strange disconnect is a lot more suspicious. I need to carefully read his first post some more because his claim did throw me off which is why if he is indeed scum I congratulate him for doing a move like that.


At the time when I brought up rng'ing the lurker lynch, the only cases we had in the thread were on you and on hapa. Do you disagree that if there are no reasonable cases, a policy or lurker lynch makes sense?

I really don't see this "contradiction". Even if something is a bad choice, sometimes there are no better choices, and at that point in the day it looked like this lynch might be one of those times.
"It's the torso" "only more so!"
BlackMamba24
Profile Joined August 2012
United States277 Posts
August 31 2012 22:25 GMT
#303
"and you have yet to convince me why your case isn't the scummiest thing in the thread."

Ok, you're not worth talking to.

Anyway can anyone familiar with strongandbigs meta tell me if it is normal for him, as town, to make huge fucking posts immediately and add a ton of bravado like that into anything he says cause if not I'm saying we should lynch him.
BlackMamba24
Profile Joined August 2012
United States277 Posts
August 31 2012 22:26 GMT
#304
On September 01 2012 07:24 strongandbig wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 07:17 BlackMamba24 wrote:
Hapahauli actually found a huge contradiction on page 12 and it seems off to me too. If he really thinks policy lynches are that dumb (Like I do) why would he make suggestions or explanations in support of it? "If people are proposing a lurker lynch, I think we should come up with a list that a majority of us can agree on and then RNG it using some method." The whole tone of that sentence seems completely off to me for someone who doesn't like policy lynches in the first place.

Also, the miller claim. It basically protects scum from the DT. If you get DT checked you'd return scum in stead of self-aware miller so nobody can confirm it until you're dead and it gives you a point of argument if you do get DT checked. I need to go over his first post a bit closer but

By the way can we please not lynch or FoS people for being absent from the thread until certain times? I normally wake up between 2-4 PM PST and am quite busy most of the day so keep that in mind.

On September 01 2012 04:59 marvellosity wrote:
On September 01 2012 04:47 strongandbig wrote:
On September 01 2012 04:25 marvellosity wrote:
ok it's not been discussed at all, but it keeps being pushed.

s&b seems to think that Mamba's case which is full of crap is less scummy than Hapa's pressure vote on Hopeless1der, and it makes no sense to me at all. He says he's not happy to vote someone based on one bad case, but is extremely happy to be suspicious of Hapa pressuring Hopeless.

Why this disparity?


Marv you were obsing ptp. VE and wiggles both made cases that were just as crappy as this one, I called them both scum, and they both flipped town. I just am not convinced that making bad cases is a good scum tell anymore. Like, does his case push a scum agenda or sew confusion? No, to me it just looks bad.

It is weird that blackmamba just disappeared. If he leaves his vote on hapahauli without making a new case then he'll jump to the top of my scum list.



And one other thing - I had been looking at hapa's vote on hopeless as "I think you are scum and want to kill you." That's how I vote - if I vote early in the day like that, I expect everyone to understand from that "I really mean what I'm saying right now, I'm serious about it." Like I said last time, it makes no sense when you think of it as meaning that, but when you change how you're thinking of it to a "pressure vote" it sounds better.




Alright. You and ghost were both doing the same thing effectively so the explanation is reasonable.

I don't wanna lynch Mementoss. He's cute.

The thing with Blackmamba - the case was bad, ok. But if it was to cause discussion, then fine. Except he hasn't been around to actually deal with the discussion, and I find that scummy.

I'd fucking love to policy lynch Zentor but annoyingly I can't quite bring myself to

##Vote: Blackmamba24


Because only scum sleep in late or get sinus infections.


I don't think there is a clear disconnect in the way Marvellosity sees MrZentor. If, in his mind, he thinks lynching Zentor is a good idea he's going to be biased and find and see things that support that preconceived notion. I'm guilty of building connections based on bad cases or even people I wasn't really that suspicious of because I want to be right. It's something that happens. I think SNB's strange disconnect is a lot more suspicious. I need to carefully read his first post some more because his claim did throw me off which is why if he is indeed scum I congratulate him for doing a move like that.


At the time when I brought up rng'ing the lurker lynch, the only cases we had in the thread were on you and on hapa. Do you disagree that if there are no reasonable cases, a policy or lurker lynch makes sense?

I really don't see this "contradiction". Even if something is a bad choice, sometimes there are no better choices, and at that point in the day it looked like this lynch might be one of those times.


There's always a case. There's always a weird feeling about something someone said that seemed "off" or even a connection between two players.

It's just weird that you didn't qualify that statement or mention your distaste for policy lynches until later, it makes it seem to me, like you're trying to appear as "with the town" as you can.
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
August 31 2012 22:32 GMT
#305
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=359357&user=116463 day 1 pokemafia SnB
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
Shady Sands
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4021 Posts
August 31 2012 22:34 GMT
#306
Hi guys, I'm back. Given that Node is going to get modkilled:
##Unvote

I read Risen's case on me and I like it. It's long, which earns points in my book. That being said, I disagree with its conclusion that I am scum, since I'm not. I'll respond to it in a bit, but first and foremost, I'd like everyone to focus on the scummiest player so far:

Ghost_403

Here's how Ghost kicks off his scumhunt:

On August 31 2012 22:35 ghost_403 wrote:
I agree with Hapa: BMB's case was lackluster at best. Hapa came into the thread, posted "I'm town, flavor sucks", and that's it. I really don't see that as some sort of scum tell on his part.

BMB: I'm curious. Has anyone else in the thread stuck out to you as playing scummy?

Marv: What do you think about BMB's case against Hapa?

Risen's play this game is a little off from the Risen we all know and love. Not sure exactly why as of yet. Could be it's just been a while since he's played.


Completely fluffy. First agrees that the case is lackluster, but no tell. Then asks BMB for more reads while he himself posts no reads. Then asks Marv for reads on BMB. Then offers a null tell on Risen. I essence... much ado about nothing.

Then defends BMB from Hapa in an effort to look active. But again, no scumreads.

On August 31 2012 22:51 ghost_403 wrote:
Calm down, Hapa. Just because BMB wrote up a subpar case on Day 1 does not mean that he's scum. BMB (aka DoctorHelvetica) is very good at this game. I doubt that anyone can know his alignment quite yet, nevermind based on a single case he's presented on Day 1.

@BMB: You are DrH, right?


Then again a no-content post, just a defense of his own actions.

On August 31 2012 23:22 ghost_403 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2012 22:53 marvellosity wrote:
On August 31 2012 22:51 ghost_403 wrote:
Calm down, Hapa. Just because BMB wrote up a subpar case on Day 1 does not mean that he's scum. BMB (aka DoctorHelvetica) is very good at this game. I doubt that anyone can know his alignment quite yet, nevermind based on a single case he's presented on Day 1.

@BMB: You are DrH, right?


Why are you attacking Hapa for pressuring a pile of shit case?


I'm not attacking, I'm telling him to take a step back and evaluate whether he thinks that BMB's case was due to (a) him being scum or (b) him writing up a case 5 hours into the game. The two of those are very different, and I don't see evidence in his analysis of him thinking that question through.


Then Ghost goes huge WIFOM. He even lampshades it.

On August 31 2012 23:29 ghost_403 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2012 23:26 marvellosity wrote:
On August 31 2012 23:22 ghost_403 wrote:
On August 31 2012 22:53 marvellosity wrote:
On August 31 2012 22:51 ghost_403 wrote:
Calm down, Hapa. Just because BMB wrote up a subpar case on Day 1 does not mean that he's scum. BMB (aka DoctorHelvetica) is very good at this game. I doubt that anyone can know his alignment quite yet, nevermind based on a single case he's presented on Day 1.

@BMB: You are DrH, right?


Why are you attacking Hapa for pressuring a pile of shit case?


I'm not attacking, I'm telling him to take a step back and evaluate whether he thinks that BMB's case was due to (a) him being scum or (b) him writing up a case 5 hours into the game. The two of those are very different, and I don't see evidence in his analysis of him thinking that question through.


I'm curious, because by your own reasoning

1) DrH made a bad case
2) DrH is a very good player

does it not make more sense that a bad case from someone you think is good is scummier than a bad case from a nublet?


WIFOM mode engage!

Don't you think that someone as good as BMB would, as scum, be more careful to not make a bad case?

I see this as BMB just being aggressive and trying to get the ball moving. I can't imagine him being quite so bold and careless as scum.

Do you think that his case is really a scum-tell?


Still no case at this point. We have Hapa, Hopeless, Memento, BMB, and myself all making lots of noise but he somehow seems to think everyone is just a confused townie. Which would make a lot of sense if he had prior knowledge as scum.

On August 31 2012 23:38 ghost_403 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2012 23:34 marvellosity wrote:
On August 31 2012 23:29 ghost_403 wrote:
On August 31 2012 23:26 marvellosity wrote:
On August 31 2012 23:22 ghost_403 wrote:
On August 31 2012 22:53 marvellosity wrote:
On August 31 2012 22:51 ghost_403 wrote:
Calm down, Hapa. Just because BMB wrote up a subpar case on Day 1 does not mean that he's scum. BMB (aka DoctorHelvetica) is very good at this game. I doubt that anyone can know his alignment quite yet, nevermind based on a single case he's presented on Day 1.

@BMB: You are DrH, right?


Why are you attacking Hapa for pressuring a pile of shit case?


I'm not attacking, I'm telling him to take a step back and evaluate whether he thinks that BMB's case was due to (a) him being scum or (b) him writing up a case 5 hours into the game. The two of those are very different, and I don't see evidence in his analysis of him thinking that question through.


I'm curious, because by your own reasoning

1) DrH made a bad case
2) DrH is a very good player

does it not make more sense that a bad case from someone you think is good is scummier than a bad case from a nublet?


WIFOM mode engage!

Don't you think that someone as good as BMB would, as scum, be more careful to not make a bad case?

I see this as BMB just being aggressive and trying to get the ball moving. I can't imagine him being quite so bold and careless as scum.

Do you think that his case is really a scum-tell?


yeah, ok, let's not go down the WIFOM road. Suffice to say, when someone does something bad, "he should know not to do something bad" has always struck me as an inadequate way of explaining it away.

Black's case is certainly scummier than what he was making the case on (hapa's play). Conversely, do you see that case as a town-tell?


My spreadsheet has BMB marked down as scum due to that case, but I'm not convinced on it enough to vote him yet. BMB is a good player, and lynching him based on a bad case he made this early on Day 1 is terrible play. I'm certainly going to be watching him closely.

What I would really like from him is for him to come back and tell us his thoughts on everyone's reactions to his case. That would tell me a lot more about his alignment than what he's already said in thread.


Whoa! We have a scumread now! Everyone drop socks and grab your throttles, because after half a day of posting Ghost says BMB is scum. Except...
Don't you think that someone as good as BMB would, as scum, be more careful to not make a bad case?

I see this as BMB just being aggressive and trying to get the ball moving. I can't imagine him being quite so bold and careless as scum.

Do you think that his case is really a scum-tell?

This is what Ghost posted in his very own previous post. What? Classic case of scum forgetting what he wrote earlier and just trying to agree with people.
Then he tries to split hairs about BMB (I think he's scum but I don't see his posting behavior/casemaking as scum!) then asks people what they think about BMB.
On September 01 2012 00:48 ghost_403 wrote:
Gut reaction. What are your thoughts on BMB's alignment?

Then says he hasn't found a scum candidate yet:
On September 01 2012 03:15 ghost_403 wrote:
Well, since I'd rather lynch scum today, I haven't quite made up my mind. Plenty of town reads, but haven't found a good scum candidate quite yet. I'll let you know when I find one.

But he'd be happy with a MMToss lynch in the very next post. What?
On September 01 2012 03:20 ghost_403 wrote:
Actually, I'd be pretty happy with a MMToss lynch. Still waiting for S+B to chime in.

Playing mafia while TI2 is on is really hard.

Then he votes MMToss as soon as HiroPro makes a big case on MMToss. But there's no independent analysis from ghost as to why he's making this vote as opposed to BMB (who he has marked down as scum in his spreadsheet.)

Then he offers a defense of his actions:
On September 01 2012 03:49 ghost_403 wrote:
Palmar being AFK is probably due to the TI2, I'm withholding judgement on him until he comes back. Can't change my mind on Risen until he comes back and starts acting more or less Risen. Marv's disappearance is disconcerting, but probably not alignment indicative.

I never said BMB was not mafia, I just said that I'm not ready to lynch him over a single bad case he had presented. I'm still waiting for him to come back into the thread and respond to what's happened. His response is going to determine my view of his alignment.

Still not quite sure of what I think of S+B. I haven't seen a scum player make a legit fakeclaim for a long time, so based on the metagame, I'm inclined to believe him when he claimed miller. However, you're right, his posts have been a little bit off. That's why I really want him to chime in on the MMToss situation.

Every single read he gives is null or townie. Again, no justification for the MMToss vote and then keeps splitting hairs over BMB. He asks other people to look at MMToss (gotta keep that scum wagon rolling, yo) but then doesn't offer any justification for the vote himself.

I find Ghost's entire train of reasoning on Mementoss consistent with a scum with prior knowledge of alignments, trying to stay active without posting real content.

Therefore: ## Vote Ghost_403
Что?
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
August 31 2012 22:37 GMT
#307
On September 01 2012 07:32 Mementoss wrote:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=359357&user=116463 day 1 pokemafia SnB


Only thing I noticed is in pokemafia he seemed to try and be a town leader, and lead cases. In this game he seems to be more going with the flow. imo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
BlackMamba24
Profile Joined August 2012
United States277 Posts
August 31 2012 22:37 GMT
#308
On September 01 2012 07:32 Mementoss wrote:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=359357&user=116463 day 1 pokemafia SnB

There's nothing in the OP, what alignment was he in this game?
Mementoss
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada2595 Posts
August 31 2012 22:38 GMT
#309
On September 01 2012 07:37 BlackMamba24 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 07:32 Mementoss wrote:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=359357&user=116463 day 1 pokemafia SnB

There's nothing in the OP, what alignment was he in this game?


town
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu96xMwFVXw
BlackMamba24
Profile Joined August 2012
United States277 Posts
August 31 2012 22:38 GMT
#310
On September 01 2012 07:37 Mementoss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 07:32 Mementoss wrote:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=359357&user=116463 day 1 pokemafia SnB


Only thing I noticed is in pokemafia he seemed to try and be a town leader, and lead cases. In this game he seems to be more going with the flow. imo

In this game he got to the point and didn't write 10000 word posts about nothing except how town he is because town has no reason to do that. the only reason I'm not voting SNB right now is because fakeclaims always throw me for a loop and I could second-guess myself for a very long time. I'll probably make up my mind within the next few hours, I need to meditate or at least have some breakfast.
strongandbig
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States4858 Posts
August 31 2012 22:44 GMT
#311
On September 01 2012 07:26 BlackMamba24 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 07:24 strongandbig wrote:
On September 01 2012 07:17 BlackMamba24 wrote:
Hapahauli actually found a huge contradiction on page 12 and it seems off to me too. If he really thinks policy lynches are that dumb (Like I do) why would he make suggestions or explanations in support of it? "If people are proposing a lurker lynch, I think we should come up with a list that a majority of us can agree on and then RNG it using some method." The whole tone of that sentence seems completely off to me for someone who doesn't like policy lynches in the first place.

Also, the miller claim. It basically protects scum from the DT. If you get DT checked you'd return scum in stead of self-aware miller so nobody can confirm it until you're dead and it gives you a point of argument if you do get DT checked. I need to go over his first post a bit closer but

By the way can we please not lynch or FoS people for being absent from the thread until certain times? I normally wake up between 2-4 PM PST and am quite busy most of the day so keep that in mind.

On September 01 2012 04:59 marvellosity wrote:
On September 01 2012 04:47 strongandbig wrote:
On September 01 2012 04:25 marvellosity wrote:
ok it's not been discussed at all, but it keeps being pushed.

s&b seems to think that Mamba's case which is full of crap is less scummy than Hapa's pressure vote on Hopeless1der, and it makes no sense to me at all. He says he's not happy to vote someone based on one bad case, but is extremely happy to be suspicious of Hapa pressuring Hopeless.

Why this disparity?


Marv you were obsing ptp. VE and wiggles both made cases that were just as crappy as this one, I called them both scum, and they both flipped town. I just am not convinced that making bad cases is a good scum tell anymore. Like, does his case push a scum agenda or sew confusion? No, to me it just looks bad.

It is weird that blackmamba just disappeared. If he leaves his vote on hapahauli without making a new case then he'll jump to the top of my scum list.



And one other thing - I had been looking at hapa's vote on hopeless as "I think you are scum and want to kill you." That's how I vote - if I vote early in the day like that, I expect everyone to understand from that "I really mean what I'm saying right now, I'm serious about it." Like I said last time, it makes no sense when you think of it as meaning that, but when you change how you're thinking of it to a "pressure vote" it sounds better.




Alright. You and ghost were both doing the same thing effectively so the explanation is reasonable.

I don't wanna lynch Mementoss. He's cute.

The thing with Blackmamba - the case was bad, ok. But if it was to cause discussion, then fine. Except he hasn't been around to actually deal with the discussion, and I find that scummy.

I'd fucking love to policy lynch Zentor but annoyingly I can't quite bring myself to

##Vote: Blackmamba24


Because only scum sleep in late or get sinus infections.


I don't think there is a clear disconnect in the way Marvellosity sees MrZentor. If, in his mind, he thinks lynching Zentor is a good idea he's going to be biased and find and see things that support that preconceived notion. I'm guilty of building connections based on bad cases or even people I wasn't really that suspicious of because I want to be right. It's something that happens. I think SNB's strange disconnect is a lot more suspicious. I need to carefully read his first post some more because his claim did throw me off which is why if he is indeed scum I congratulate him for doing a move like that.


At the time when I brought up rng'ing the lurker lynch, the only cases we had in the thread were on you and on hapa. Do you disagree that if there are no reasonable cases, a policy or lurker lynch makes sense?

I really don't see this "contradiction". Even if something is a bad choice, sometimes there are no better choices, and at that point in the day it looked like this lynch might be one of those times.


There's always a case. There's always a weird feeling about something someone said that seemed "off" or even a connection between two players.

It's just weird that you didn't qualify that statement or mention your distaste for policy lynches until later, it makes it seem to me, like you're trying to appear as "with the town" as you can.


I guess I must just not dislike policy lynches quite as much as you do. There were a couple of people who did seem suspicious. Hapa felt suspicious to me. However, at a certain point you have to ask what amount of suspicion it takes to be worth lynching on.

Anyway, I see that you and mementoss are discussing my meta. Not much that I can say about that, you'll just have to read a few of my games and draw your own conclusions if you want to really get into it. I just came off a pretty good town day 1 in pokemafia, where I died N1. I'd like to discuss my play in that game some more, but it's still ongoing so I can't really. The two games I played before that were mad men mafia and WBG's not themed mafia.

Now, it's 12:45 my time and I need to go to sleep. So, I'm forced to figure out who I want to vote for.
"It's the torso" "only more so!"
strongandbig
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States4858 Posts
August 31 2012 22:51 GMT
#312
On September 01 2012 07:38 BlackMamba24 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 07:37 Mementoss wrote:
On September 01 2012 07:32 Mementoss wrote:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=359357&user=116463 day 1 pokemafia SnB


Only thing I noticed is in pokemafia he seemed to try and be a town leader, and lead cases. In this game he seems to be more going with the flow. imo

In this game he got to the point and didn't write 10000 word posts about nothing except how town he is because town has no reason to do that. the only reason I'm not voting SNB right now is because fakeclaims always throw me for a loop and I could second-guess myself for a very long time. I'll probably make up my mind within the next few hours, I need to meditate or at least have some breakfast.


Wait you're trying to make a meta read on my miller claim and compare it to a game where I didn't have to put myself under special scrutiny, on account of how I wasn't a miller? I really don't think that's a valid comparison.
"It's the torso" "only more so!"
Hapahauli
Profile Joined May 2009
United States9305 Posts
August 31 2012 22:51 GMT
#313
On September 01 2012 07:25 BlackMamba24 wrote:
...
Anyway can anyone familiar with strongandbigs meta tell me if it is normal for him, as town, to make huge fucking posts immediately and add a ton of bravado like that into anything he says cause if not I'm saying we should lynch him.


Pardon my skepticism, but is this really a scumtell? Even if he historically makes smaller posts as town, I can't imagine why making larger posts would make him mafia, even on a meta-basis.
a talking rock that sprouts among the waves woosh
Shady Sands
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4021 Posts
August 31 2012 22:52 GMT
#314
Is everyone just ignoring my fucking case on ghost?
Что?
BlackMamba24
Profile Joined August 2012
United States277 Posts
August 31 2012 22:58 GMT
#315
On September 01 2012 07:51 Hapahauli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 07:25 BlackMamba24 wrote:
...
Anyway can anyone familiar with strongandbigs meta tell me if it is normal for him, as town, to make huge fucking posts immediately and add a ton of bravado like that into anything he says cause if not I'm saying we should lynch him.


Pardon my skepticism, but is this really a scumtell? Even if he historically makes smaller posts as town, I can't imagine why making larger posts would make him mafia, even on a meta-basis.


One scum almost always takes it upon themselves to make large posts early on and establish themselves as very very "pro-town". They love buzzwords like "anti-town" and other stupid things like that. I just can't see any reason for a townie to spend that much time, early in the game, establishing their townieness unless there is a mayoral election or something like that.

The fakeclaim is throwing me off.

There's also that contradiction that you yourself pointed out. I can understand why a scum player would defend me as well, they might be thinking there's no reason to go after me early on and get OMGUS'd or get my attention when they can kill me at night but I'm not really that good. My town meta is to pin the entire mafia team Day 2 and then vote for everyone else instead.
HiroPro
Profile Joined March 2012
United States2624 Posts
August 31 2012 22:59 GMT
#316
hey shady, I'd like if you could make a response to MT's case.
Risen
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States7927 Posts
August 31 2012 23:02 GMT
#317
On September 01 2012 06:21 Hapahauli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2012 05:51 Risen wrote:
On September 01 2012 05:49 Hapahauli wrote:
@ MrZentor - can I request that you vote BlackMamba24? I doubt you'll get many followers with your Palmar vote, and as it stands, we want to start narrowing down our focus over the next few hours.


Why do you say this? People could easily be persuaded into voting for Palmar. I think the only thing protecting Palmar at this point is his "veteran" status. What's the difference between Palmar and MrZ right now except that MrZ actually dug and found "something"?


I'm trying to push a lynch on my top scumread. I really don't know what to make of Palmar, but I find BMB scummy and therefore I'll rally support on him.


That makes your statement quite a bit less sinister... I thought you were just saying no one would vote Palmar.
Pufftrees Everyday>its like a rifter that just used X-Factor/Liquid'Nony: I hope no one lip read XD/Holyflare>it's like policy lynching but better/Resident Los Angeles bachelor
Palmar
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Iceland22632 Posts
August 31 2012 23:03 GMT
#318
hey I'll be voting whatever ghost_403 is voting because I think he's town.
Computer says mafia
Palmar
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Iceland22632 Posts
August 31 2012 23:03 GMT
#319
##vote mementoss
Computer says mafia
MrZentor
Profile Joined December 2010
United States1648 Posts
August 31 2012 23:04 GMT
#320
Ugh.

That just reeks of attempting to look like lazy town.
Falling’s just like flying, except there’s a more permanent destination.
Prev 1 14 15 16 17 18 52 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
HomeStory Cup
11:00
XXVII: Day 1
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ROOTCatZ 153
NeuroSwarm 138
Livibee 135
ProTech78
StarCraft: Brood War
Aegong 72
LancerX 19
yabsab 16
Dota 2
capcasts221
Pyrionflax212
League of Legends
Grubby3610
JimRising 538
Counter-Strike
summit1g7947
Foxcn195
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken53
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor66
Other Games
FrodaN3134
shahzam726
fl0m582
Mew2King165
ZombieGrub53
PPMD39
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta50
• Adnapsc2 13
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 50
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift3690
• Jankos2195
Other Games
• imaqtpie995
• Scarra631
Upcoming Events
HomeStory Cup
12h 27m
CSO Cup
17h 27m
BSL: ProLeague
19h 27m
SOOP
1d 10h
SHIN vs ByuN
HomeStory Cup
1d 13h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 19h
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV European League
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
5 days
WardiTV European League
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Rose Open S1
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
HSC XXVII
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.