EPTTL Mafia LVII - Page 19
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On September 04 2012 11:57 Mattchew wrote: woah... i asked for all other nosy neighbors to claim, not blues. so its not buried | ||
|
BlackMamba24
United States277 Posts
On September 04 2012 11:57 Mattchew wrote: he's trying to say he pm'd palmar now he's making up fake scum motivations for your claim not even really reading your post just cherrypicking and trying to push his fake case. hes scum. | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
On September 04 2012 11:30 BlackMamba24 wrote: Can you explain why it's scum motivated? Why does scum want sloosh out of the game when all he's doing is arguing with Toadesstern and asking dumb questions First, I'd like to specify that asking questions that get others to discuss their reads on other players, or to defend themselves for something suspicious said in their posts, is not "dumb." I in fact find it suspicious from a townie perspective to call many of the lines of questioning recently presented in this thread as "dumb," since so far most of it has produced productive discussion. From a scum perspective, though, a statement like this does make sense. Scum has the knowledge of who is and isn't scum, so to them watching people they know to be town attacking each other could look pretty "dumb." Second, at the time I posted that sloosh was one of the most outspoken people in the game. From a scum perspective, it would make sense to remove an outspoken person day one. Especially if said person was furthering discussion by poking and prodding others with a lot of questions. While we're at it, I'd like to ask about this: On September 04 2012 11:34 BlackMamba24 wrote: Anyway - ##vote BloodyC0bbler. Nosy Neigbor specifies that you will not know who you visited, not "you will not know that you are the nosy neighbor" which implies that they would at least know they are the nosy neighbor. Nosy Neighbor makes a lot of sense as a scum fakeclaim it's probably what I would claim if I had to and thinking about SNB from Death Note mafia I have no reason to implicitly trust mattchew but the fact that you're throwing suspicion on him this early and this stupidly is completely consistent with your scum meta so bye What's with the vote for BloodyCobbler? He's pretty much a lurker at this point, but you're voting him for non-policy reasons... This feels like a scum getting behind a safe lurker lynch vote, at least at the time you wrote it (it just came to my attention as I'm about to post this that another page of postings have taken place, and cobbler has just made another post...)... My guess is this is a pressure vote, but I would appreciate a bit more of an explanation if you could provide it. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On September 04 2012 11:57 BlackMamba24 wrote: Roles and game specific rules go ahead point it out BC clearly stated that he is making an assumption based on his experience with previous games. This discussion is pointless until someone hears from a mod. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On September 04 2012 11:58 BlackMamba24 wrote: now he's making up fake scum motivations for your claim not even really reading your post just cherrypicking and trying to push his fake case. hes scum. Yes, the liar is town and the not liar is scum. Drh Logic ftw. Now people know why I play less, because logic doesn't exist here. You are right, I did misread his post for that I apologize, i skimmed saw what I thought was bs and posted on it. He still clearly lied. Give me a town motivation for lying at this stage in the game drH. Please tell me what a townie gets from lying about his role this early into the game. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On September 04 2012 12:01 DarthPunk wrote: BC clearly stated that he is making an assumption based on his experience with previous games. This discussion is pointless until someone hears from a mod. It isnt an assumption. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On September 04 2012 12:02 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Yes, the liar is town and the not liar is scum. Drh Logic ftw. Now people know why I play less, because logic doesn't exist here. You are right, I did misread his post for that I apologize, i skimmed saw what I thought was bs and posted on it. He still clearly lied. Give me a town motivation for lying at this stage in the game drH. Please tell me what a townie gets from lying about his role this early into the game. devils advocate answers: vanilla trying to look blue and draw a shot blue trying to look vanilla | ||
|
goodkarma
United States1067 Posts
Never mind about posting more on your thoughts on why you voted bloodycobbler. Your motivations are pretty clear with your latest post+ Show Spoiler + (at 11:58, in case you snipe me again... -_-) | ||
|
BlackMamba24
United States277 Posts
On September 04 2012 12:00 goodkarma wrote: @BlackMamba: First, I'd like to specify that asking questions that get others to discuss their reads on other players, or to defend themselves for something suspicious said in their posts, is not "dumb." I in fact find it suspicious from a townie perspective to call many of the lines of questioning recently presented in this thread as "dumb," since so far most of it has produced productive discussion. From a scum perspective, though, a statement like this does make sense. Scum has the knowledge of who is and isn't scum, so to them watching people they know to be town attacking each other could look pretty "dumb." Second, at the time I posted that sloosh was one of the most outspoken people in the game. From a scum perspective, it would make sense to remove an outspoken person day one. Especially if said person was furthering discussion by poking and prodding others with a lot of questions. While we're at it, I'd like to ask about this: What's with the vote for BloodyCobbler? He's pretty much a lurker at this point, but you're voting him for non-policy reasons... This feels like a scum getting behind a safe lurker lynch vote, at least at the time you wrote it (it just came to my attention as I'm about to post this that another page of postings have taken place, and cobbler has just made another post...)... My guess is this is a pressure vote, but I would appreciate a bit more of an explanation if you could provide it. because BC is full of shit and also making up stuff mattchew never said i'll never policy vote, i hate even reading the words next to each other i respectfully disagree about sloosh and how productive he has been but i'm not going to argue about it. i won't say anything about my read on him or toadesstern right now. hope that satisfies you | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On September 04 2012 12:04 Mattchew wrote: devils advocate answers: vanilla trying to look blue and draw a shot blue trying to look vanilla No mafia will shoot a nosy neighbor and any vig who does is stupid, blue trying to look vanilla would claim vanilla. You don't claim miller. Miller is a mafia claim to explain why they do shit at night. Pre claiming is to add "legitimacy to it" | ||
|
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
(...) What's with the vote for BloodyCobbler? He's pretty much a lurker at this point, but you're voting him for non-policy reasons... This feels like a scum getting behind a safe lurker lynch vote, at least at the time you wrote it (it just came to my attention as I'm about to post this that another page of postings have taken place, and cobbler has just made another post...)... My guess is this is a pressure vote, but I would appreciate a bit more of an explanation if you could provide it. Wait what? He's a one-liner semi-lurker who answers in riddles and you are ok with that and is defensive on him? Tell us why you think that not answering the godamn question straight-up of why he is so sure of the whole miller deal is pro-town? | ||
|
BlackMamba24
United States277 Posts
On September 04 2012 12:02 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Yes, the liar is town and the not liar is scum. Drh Logic ftw. Now people know why I play less, because logic doesn't exist here. You are right, I did misread his post for that I apologize, i skimmed saw what I thought was bs and posted on it. He still clearly lied. Give me a town motivation for lying at this stage in the game drH. Please tell me what a townie gets from lying about his role this early into the game. here we go prove he's lying or shut up and get lynched if it's so obvious why have you gone this long without providing any evidence or any information from the setup at all that proves he is lying 100% as you claim why is it that no one believes you if it's that obvious. we must just all be "stupid" right. stop pretending to be frustrated, if we're dumb explain it to us and play to win. | ||
|
BlackMamba24
United States277 Posts
On September 04 2012 12:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote: No mafia will shoot a nosy neighbor and any vig who does is stupid, blue trying to look vanilla would claim vanilla. You don't claim miller. Miller is a mafia claim to explain why they do shit at night. Pre claiming is to add "legitimacy to it" i agree with this i'm surprised you didn't point out why this was the good mafia claim instead of making stuff up about how he's trying to draw out blue claims can you prove he's lying now or are you done making a fool of yourself | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On September 04 2012 12:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote: No mafia will shoot a nosy neighbor and any vig who does is stupid, blue trying to look vanilla would claim vanilla. You don't claim miller. Miller is a mafia claim to explain why they do shit at night. Pre claiming is to add "legitimacy to it" vigs have 2 shots this game.. im just saying | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On September 04 2012 12:13 BroodKingEXE wrote: Actually, Mattchew why should they claim now? Can't they just wait till its pointed out? lol | ||
|
ShiaoPi
TAIWAN NUMBAH WAN5956 Posts
On September 04 2012 12:13 BroodKingEXE wrote: Actually, Mattchew why should they claim now? Can't they just wait till its pointed out? no...that kind of defeats the purpose | ||
| ||
