Bureaucracy Mafia! - Page 5
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On July 19 2012 04:30 syllogism wrote: We are lynching katina or foolishness :/ I was aware of your choices syllo. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On July 17 2012 05:56 Katina wrote: Mafia does stupid things, Palmar does stupid things. Especially when he's Mafia or third party, your reasoning for that is "He can't be that stupid if he's Mafia". Why would you redirect the nuke at marv? I don't like the vote on syllogism right now, especially with your lack of reasoning behind it. You want to shoot Kurumi and redirect a nuke at Marv. Can you elaborate? It seems that you are throwing around doubt and trying to side track people in your first post. You post one sentence about people who are scummy such as Kurumi (which you seem to have scummy feelings towards) and Palmar. You basically posted close to nothing just a sentence maybe two on a few people. I know you all too well, those are the things you taught me to do. I know you are Mafia love cake <3 Syllo this is one post I like from Katina. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On July 19 2012 05:19 Blazinghand wrote: LOL WUT LOL "an influential town player" Kurumi at that time? Are you fucking kidding me? Kurumi was caught scum and was self-destructing, and I figured on the off chance he was town I'd give him some advice on what to do before he died so that after the flip he'd look good. Are you even paying attention? Kurumi? Did you read the thread? Come on, man, there's tons of evidence against me, tons of qutoes you could use, and you used THAT ONE? Did you just quote a random post from me or what? Put some serious effort in. It's not THAT HARD. LOL Calm down dude. If it's that ludicrous then don't bother responding. Respond to all the "tons of evidence against you" instead if you want to respond to anything. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On July 19 2012 05:21 syllogism wrote: I liked it too, but by this point it's outweighed by all the bad, in particular her last few posts. This just screams lazy mafia She went from "knowing [foolishness] is mafia" to basically ignoring him. I mean - she's no shining beacon of towniness but she has opinions syllo. I don't understand what makes her a better candidate for you than others who seem to have no opinion. What are your thoughts on Bill Murray for instance? Or Zealos? Why Katina over | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On July 19 2012 05:33 marvellosity wrote: so smooth, VE <3 Reserve judgement until near dawn. You might not like what I have to say about you. :X | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On July 19 2012 05:41 marvellosity wrote: I'd lean on town-side of null on Palmar atm. That was....not the answer I expected. Congratulations. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On July 19 2012 05:51 marvellosity wrote: Also VE, I am extremely happy to discuss practically anything with you, I've just not got the energy to discuss you thinking I'm scum. Well to be frank I wasn't really willing to discuss that either. YOU KNOW ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. What about gonzaw then? His catchup post is....gosh, it's phenomenal and it has me doubting my read on him. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
gonzaw, I don't want to hear you complain one single solitary more time how big and intimidating the thread is. Your posts are often massive and a chore to read, so you coming in here complaining about how much you have to read is borderline insulting. Get over it. You knew how many games you were in, be a big boy and contribute if you want to live. Or don't and face the rope. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On July 19 2012 06:22 austinmcc wrote: Anyone else really liking this idea, or some form of it? For all the talk about how votes were swapped/the deadline sucked/no lynches suck, I think this was really the only suggestion that proposed a decent way of dealing with those problems. It's not perfect, but I feel like it's certainly better than all the swapping last night, and despite Foolishness's admonitions about vote swapping leading to no-lynches, we've got so many different reads being thrown around that the thread is clogged with options and I don't really see us doing a great job consolidating through that early on future days. Maybe the deadline change helps with a few players, but as long as we enforce it, does anyone think that shaving off...maybe even 8 hours from the day cycle is going to lead us to a much worse lynch than a full 48 hours' discussion? There's no way to enforce it as policy - I was talking about everyone having their own individual targets/subtargets by that time...which honestly most people did...it's just that the first day of the game was so chaotic with everything that was going on that there was no actual discussion about why we had the targets we did until really close to the lynch time...which seems to happen quite a bit around here anyway. Austin you've come under some pretty heavy fire for some of your views on Sandroba. Do you have any reason to think that Sandroba is scum besides the fact that he's proven ballsy as scum and setup speculation? I have to say that I find Sand's posts to sound very town, and to be honest I think you're wearing my hat. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On July 19 2012 06:27 wherebugsgo wrote: Okay, several things: I can confirm that there is at least one messaging power that can be used on townies. I received this after the daypost: And I confirmed with the host that this is a player-sent message. Secondly we have two near-confirmed scum in Kurumi and Zealos. If you're a vig or you have any sort of night KP it might be a good idea to kill them given that tomorrow will likely be a wash if they're alive. Do me do me! ^^ Honestly, if Chez sent that to you then I want up in that piece. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On July 19 2012 06:34 sandroba wrote: WBG is not the person I messaged. Okay so a redirect? Is that the message you sent? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On July 19 2012 06:55 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Actually I had considered that. I didn't ask you to use it, simply if you were going to. MZ if you had a gun right now, who would you shoot? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
MZ That read pretty bad. The point of the question was to provoke thought - the fact that you answered immediately seems to indicate that you were eager to provide a "correct" answer that you knew...but then after the implication of the question dawned on you you backtracked and gave a wishywashy answer. Eh....eeehhhhhhh..... | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
| ||