|
On July 22 2012 09:30 syllogism wrote:
Foolishness' weird defense of Palmar makes it fairly likely that palmar is an executive. That would also explain why Palmar has put some effort into his bigger posts, as I would expect him to be even lazier as a minion. I highly doubt mafia executive roles were RNGed and Foolishness flipping ceo just reinforces it.
I'm feeling this too.
|
On July 22 2012 18:34 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2012 14:05 slOosh wrote:
Awesome on two counts!
I am a Crazed Employee - basically a delayed 1 shot vig, and I targetted Foolishness last night. As you know I've been spending a majority of my time figuring him out and was wavering because he had a good case on BM which I agree with, yet chose to do exactly that a case on BM. I was torn on trying to figure out meta and trusting people's reads, but VE's grilling brought out cold hard, in-thread contradictions that I understand and trust.
How is that delayed?
I think he means last night=night 1. As in the night before the last night.
ss, what do you mean sloosh didn't kill him? Did you?
|
On July 23 2012 01:40 supersoft wrote:
what? you stole slooshs power and he has a daykill ability? LOL
we can use that to instashoot him :D
lol.
##Support
correct me if I was wrong but he did claim he had no more powers right which was the reason BM was supposed to steal his vote/abillity. So him having an abillity makes him confirmed scum unless BM is lying about it but if he does we will find out when sloosh flips something that doesn't have a daykill.
|
I am a Crazed Employee - basically a delayed 1 shot vig, and I targetted Foolishness last night.
I can only shoot when no mafia have died for 1.5 cycles, so basically I can only start shooting night 2.
BM steals a dayvig.
I'm counting 3 different abillitys.
|
On July 23 2012 02:07 syllogism wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2012 01:51 slOosh wrote:Quick post before I can properly play at night: On July 22 2012 18:34 syllogism wrote:On July 22 2012 14:05 slOosh wrote:
Awesome on two counts!
I am a Crazed Employee - basically a delayed 1 shot vig, and I targetted Foolishness last night. As you know I've been spending a majority of my time figuring him out and was wavering because he had a good case on BM which I agree with, yet chose to do exactly that a case on BM. I was torn on trying to figure out meta and trusting people's reads, but VE's grilling brought out cold hard, in-thread contradictions that I understand and trust.
How is that delayed? I can only shoot when no mafia have died for 1.5 cycles, so basically I can only start shooting night 2. Didn't bother clarifying beyond "delayed" because it's 1 shot and it went off, apologies if I worded it ambiguously. I explained my shot because it was the natural thing to do? 1-shot vigi that can only shoot if no mafia has died in 1.5 cycles? Yes that sounds like a likely role
Yes, not to mention this.
BM shoot sloosh, the sooner the better.
|
I just realised I've been onboard with lynching Palmar but I hadn't actually voted him (Nor even said I was onboard killing him)
What do you people think of his claim?
Rereading Palmar I'm starting to feel I'd rather kill Katina (Or Zealous) since the only damning case against palmar is Foolishness actions which I thought was a pretty good case but now I'm having doubts. Foolishness is not so bad a player he wouldn't realise his lazy/suspicious playstyle set himself up for an early death from lynch or vig and not realise what the consequences would be for Palmar. The more I think about it the more I'm leaning that Palmar is beeing framed.
I don't want to kill Palmar. I want to lynch Katina or Zealous today.
Q: Palmar can you pardon yourself?
Other notes: BM why haven't you shot sloosh yet? I think it's pretty damning for BM that he haven't shot already. And why aren't people pushing for BM to shoot sloosh?
|
Syllogism, You can't deter me from going after my stronger scumreads by threatening me with association and I really don't like that you're doing this. Just so I understand you, how is layabouts post scumclaim?
I'm not going to try and go for a no-lynch. We've already had enough dumbness in that area.
I will try to get zealous or katina lynched but If I can't find support for that I will vote so we get a lynch.
Syllo what do you think of the sloosh/bm situation?
|
On July 23 2012 22:13 HiroPro wrote:
What sloosh/BM situation are you talking about. BM has q-bert's vote.
Oh nvm, I've completely misunderstood some shit here.
|
On July 23 2012 22:08 supersoft wrote:
risk that makes no sense. you have two options. stick with syllo and me and help town, or you do your own thing and screw up everything.
if you convince only one that doesnt switch back, we risk a nolynch.
Fine then, I figured we had some ten hours but maybe that's not enough. Fine lets play it safe.
##Vote: Palmar
|
On July 24 2012 04:05 VisceraEyes wrote:
One at a time. After Palmer we slow the f*** down and reassess. If Palmer flips Executive, town is in a really strong position and we have time.
I couldn't agrre with this more. The chaos we've had makes it hard just to stay updated.
|
Palmar didn't flip officer.
lol. I wonder if we just lucked as hell.
|
On July 24 2012 14:47 Chezinu wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2012 14:42 risk.nuke wrote:
Palmar didn't flip officer.
lol. I wonder if we just lucked as hell. So are you a craze employee?
What is a craze employee?
|
Is Chezinu always like this?
Might shift starts. I'll be back tonight.
|
What do you mean I've just been floating under the radar.
I've not been playing irc mafia and got 20+page filter.
I'm also am aware that I haven't really made cases but not because of lack of wanting to. I just haven't been able to motivate myself into doing it when people are already voicing their suspicion against my targets. If I don't need to convince them i don't need to make a case. And not making cases is not the same as not having reads.
|
On July 25 2012 07:21 marvellosity wrote:
lol risk you sound just like Zentor
how does that feel?
that quite depresses me.
|
Look I've been working for 15 hours today. I'm going to bed now. Hopefully I won't sleep to long tomorrow mornings and I can give you a long desired case against someone. I don't know who yet but expect Zealous/Katina.
|
I really don't believe this game is balanced around mirror-roles between scum and town. It makes no sense to have it that way and it would make all scumroles unviable without outing themselves and I find it hard to believe the hosts would make a system like that. Especially these hosts. It just doesn't make sense to me. VE tell me why you think it's so and give me a few arguments that isn't let's kill a few guys to find out. Especially when that won't even prove anything. This chezinu lynch came up of nowhere and darts past other candidates and doesn't look anything like town-agenda.
|
Supersoft what kind of argument is that? Kill MZ because if every sensible person dies he's going to manipulate the town if he's scum. What's with the damn unwillingness to lynch actuall scum. We got people I've felt like nearly everyone agrees are scummy, like zealous or rastaban but somehow they don't die.
I'm going to vote Zealous now and everyone who's interested in killing scum should join in.
##Vote Zealous
|
I haven't really looked into him but he's orange in my ss.
|
On July 27 2012 00:54 syllogism wrote:
BH, Palmar and Layabout all pushed zealos lynch. It obviously doesn't clear him, but it is another reason why I don't consider him a priority. While they all flipped minion, they could have easily received orders to push for the lynch.
More likely they were just bussing the scum who would never survive to lategame for towncred?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
