On July 07 2012 13:37 Zephirdd wrote:On July 07 2012 13:28 Sinensis wrote:On July 07 2012 13:25 Zephirdd wrote:
Yeah... about that...
I guess I went overeager there. "Terrible" is a strong word.
What I mean: I don't speculate, I use facts and determine alignment of people with these. Facts, determined in the way people are playing the game(...do I have to talk about prplhz again?). Speculating is, however, useful when talking about things like night actions and stuff.
However, we are scumhunting now, or should be. In the day. daaay. Right now, we got plenty of things to work with. Baiting discussion - like me talking about the dicussion of policy lynches on the beginning, or sloosh voting wiggl3s - has already been done. You don't speculate how a person would do something as X or Y. You look at what he did and ask yourself: "is this pro-town? is there a scum agenda to it?". prplhz's actions are "no" and "yes" for these respectively. Him going MIA just confirms the scum agenda: he is hiding and trying to avoid connections between him and others.
Do you understand that a town player on D1 doesn't have facts, at all? Not a single one of them?
Because if you did, I do not think you would be saying for the second time that you don't speculate and are forming opinions based on facts.
Oh don't we?
I guess I'll repeat myself. Again. With prplhz.
FACT 1> prplhz just came out from
Movie Star Mini MafiaFACT 2> He saw what a post like
THIS can do. wherebugsgo explains it on his post-game analysis posts, this kind of posting only creates havoc and is terrible for a good town atmosphere.
FACT 3He posted
THIS. Fun fact: he did it against the same player VE did on MSMM.
Mind you, this was so fucking early in the game, and nothing marv said warranted that baseless accusation.
FACT 4He complains that marv is ignoring him
here. And does the same baseless accusation again.
FACT 5He complains that marv and VE started an exchange similar to the one on MSMM
here.
FACT 6Right after marv and VE stop their exchange and didn't create a havoc in the thread, he posts the same kind of disruptive post
here.
FACT 7After me and marv point out the previous facts, his whole defense is
On July 07 2012 01:51 prplhz wrote:On July 07 2012 01:37 Dangeresque77 wrote:
[...]
i would be ok to vote for prplhz but im not totally convinced that hes scum. then again it would help to jst go ahead and lynch one person to give us a starting ground
[...]
listen to this man
And after that,
he never posts again.
Are you telling me that, given this information, you can infer that prplhz is town?
Because I certainly cannot.