|
On June 26 2012 21:46 risk.nuke wrote:
Well it's pretty much ironclad that marv isn't mafia. Maybe a SK but honestly his playstyle doesn't fit the SK profile.
I think he's innocent and there are to many eggs in the marv basket. If he's the SK he's under our control anyway.
As such I suggest we lynch xsksc instead.
risk thinks marv is not mafia.
xsksc thinks marv is not mafia.
As such, let's lynch xsksc.
???
|
On June 26 2012 21:46 risk.nuke wrote:
Well it's pretty much ironclad that marv isn't mafia. Maybe a SK but honestly his playstyle doesn't fit the SK profile.
I think he's innocent and there are to many eggs in the marv basket. If he's the SK he's under our control anyway.
As such I suggest we lynch xsksc instead.
On June 26 2012 22:34 risk.nuke wrote:
I kind of like Mattchew, he's sadly always this lazy as town but I sense townie over his train-of-thoughts.
and
##Vote: xsksc
???
Explain please.
|
no, you're just giving me nothing to defend myself against lol.
|
On June 26 2012 22:44 marvellosity wrote:
I'm fairly sure I know what risk's explanation is, but I want to hear it from him.
xsksc, can you work out what it might be?
that I'm on rastaban and he disagrees with that?
I haven't a clue.
|
On June 26 2012 22:45 risk.nuke wrote:
If i asked you this xsksc. If I don't lynch you, who do you think we should lynch?
I'm voting for rasta, is that not obvious?
|
On June 26 2012 22:52 risk.nuke wrote:
Would you mind quickly listing three minor reasons for why you think he's scum that other people haven't said already said.
Oh I see, the "regurgitated" stuff bothers you as well. There's not a lot I can do about that.
If you want to see why I think he's scum, read my opinnion of him.
My opinnion of his filter is based heavily on day one interactions which were already discussed to death. How do you expect me to form completely brand new fresh opinnions off that? Forming an opinnion WITHOUT using stuff people have already talked about is fucking impossible after replacing in to an active game...
Would you prefer if I went and made shit up? Fabricated reads that I don't actually have, so it can be fresh?
|
On June 26 2012 23:29 risk.nuke wrote:
Nah it's just that when I suspect someone there are always minor things I think and feel that I forget or choose not to share because maybe I don't find the right words.
Here's what I think of you.
Klaus was weird. Fist he lurks hard and does finally come out with 1 decent post. Then his standard and activity falls presumably from pressure and he bandwagons Zentor.
As for you. You're shady and you don't seem to have any desire to find mafia. Your scumhunting accomplishments of this game have been a very weak case on rastaban and agreeing and repeating what others thought of rastaban. Which wouldn't be so bad exept he happens to also be the only person you've voiced suspicion on. And you didn't even start it, you just followed it up after Klaus. besides that all you've done is some pecky coment-responses to VE and Marv to keep them going.
That's because he's the only person I have a decent scum-read on. I've voiced my opinnion on marv quite a bit too.
About klaus's lurking, I know I have to answer for that as I am essentially HIM - it won't be happening for the rest of the game, that's all I can do it, really.
I'm not quite sure what you're acusing me of when you say "pecky comment-responses"..
On June 25 2012 22:20 xsksc wrote:
EBWOP, meant to add this as well.
VE - do you still have strong feelings about Marv? Has your opinnion about him changed? Are you planning to push his lynch today?
On June 26 2012 02:24 xsksc wrote:Show nested quote +On June 26 2012 02:14 VisceraEyes wrote:
I have a penchant for exaggeration xsksc. It's one of my more annoying yet endearing qualities. Well, I don't think it's doing you any favours right now. I've admired your play in the past, so I know you're not bad. I would really prefer to see you make a proper defense and refute any points you think are invalid - if you are innocent, rather than just dismissing it and voting him with an OMGUS.
Is that a bad thing? I'm trying to get more information so I can actually get a decent read on VE - I don't know if that's what you would call "pecky" but whatever, if I'm unsure about someone, I consider that more information from them is only a good thing.
|
yo, sorry I wasn't around to defend myself or consolidate for the lynch, I just woke up 5 minutes ago (it's 6am my time)
On June 27 2012 05:31 prplhz wrote:
I didn't ignore you, I read your post alright.
No I wouldn't (and I know because I just replaced into iGrok's mafia) but I don't think that means that everybody would react like that. He is using a dumb excuse for creating content and that's townie enough to me right now. von Klaust II wasn't even under any pressure, I think you voted him for lurking and that was it.
You'll also see that xsksc isn't actually defending von Klaust II's standpoints, he actually starts out by saying (correctly) that he can't take responsibility for them or explain them. He just answers the questions to create some sort of content and get a kick start into the game and I think that looks pretty townie.
This sums up what I was gonna say nicely, thanks.
I took a completely different stance on marv than von Klaust did, too, so I'm not sure why people think I'm trying to justify von Klaus's opinnions.
On June 27 2012 12:35 Mattchew wrote:
##unvote
##vote xsksc
He is bussing his teammate and is lurking and is afraid to post freely in the thread. He has no opinions on others.
And prob, I am first and foremost trying to avoid a mislynch, me being dead wont do the town any good
Lurking and afraid to post freely? No, it's called being asleep.
I have no idea you're so sure that I'm bussing Rasta O_O
|
On June 27 2012 14:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
So you'll be happy to note that marv didn't die xs...what do you think about the no-lynch and the events leading up to it?
Well, I started to get a bit worried that I might have been wrong about marv, when I was reading this bit -
On June 27 2012 10:33 marvellosity wrote:
i'm literally done.
##vote: marvellosity
On June 27 2012 10:34 marvellosity wrote:
it's pretty much playing against my wincon and i might get modkilled for it, ya.
i can't bear that after everything i've put into this game the last 48 hours, prplhz, the guy who fucking pointed out how retarded the argument on me was, goes "meh, he might be scum after all".
Like, wtf, seems completely OTT for a townie who knows he is innocent... but it did succeed in giving people second thoughts, so I guess that's why I got a bad feeling about it.
Mattchew seemed like a decent lynch, considering how little time you guys actually had to come up with one - I don't really get why you jumped off at the last minute though.
On June 27 2012 13:34 VisceraEyes wrote:
And to be honest, he pushed the right button on me losing town the game. I didn't want people to sheep me onto him when I wasn't sure of his guilt myself.
Why would it be your fault in particular, weren't you like the 4th or 5th vote onto him?
I don't think a no-lynch is as bad as some folk are making it out to be, though.
|
Seeing as it looks like everyone else went to sleep... VE, what do you think of risk.nuke (and his thoughts on me) after last night?
|
|
|
I second that motion.
|
Well he says this here
On June 27 2012 13:34 VisceraEyes wrote:
And to be honest, he pushed the right button on me losing town the game. I didn't want people to sheep me onto him when I wasn't sure of his guilt myself.
I already mentioned that I find this weird...I don't see why he felt the entire responsibility was his, and why he was so worried about it.
|
marv, shoot risk.nuke please.
|
On June 27 2012 22:49 rastaban wrote:Allow me to quote a townie from the last game I played in: Show nested quote +On June 17 2012 19:53 marvellosity wrote:
Mafia heuristic: if an outrageous play is retarded from both a scum and a town viewpoint, it is usually from mafia
marv can speak for himself, but I don't consider what he did this game to be "outrageous"
|
On June 28 2012 02:08 VisceraEyes wrote:
Read xsc's comments when he returned. When he came in, he had an opposing viewpoint regarding you than his predecessor had - yet one of risk's problems with him is that he came into the game and 'immediately tried justifying his predecessor's reads'.
And that's it man, that's the extent of his problem with xsc. xsc hasn't even been a major figure in the game, what's his opinion on others? Do you know? Do you care? Why is he a town read?
He was off-voting last night, and while he's decrying my actions regarding the lynch, his vote was uselessly parked on xsc. You at least were on Mattchew and I DID remove your part of getting the lynch done. Not risk though, he has NO right to be shitty or saying I'm "full of shit" when he can't be arsed to even SHOW UP for the fucking lynch. Twice in a row. I wonder what the excuse is last night, because unless I'm mistaken, midsummer is over.
I can go post by post if you want marvel, but you're smart enough to get the gist of what I'm talking about without it so I'm going to refrain.
I'm not even sure where you stop talking about me and start talking about risk o_O I'm exhausted - gonna go sleep, I'll reply in the morning, hopefully I can make more sense of this post then...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
