EPTBang Bang Mafia 2 - Page 17
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
If anyone shoots before that time I say we kill them tomorrow. | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
On June 12 2012 13:36 wherebugsgo wrote: If we don't have a target for gonzaw to shoot by, say, the 20 hour mark into the day, I say we should shoot gonzaw. I volunteer to be that person. If anyone shoots before that time I say we kill them tomorrow. I support this! Allow me to repost one of the most coherent post made in this whole thread: On June 12 2012 07:56 kitaman27 wrote: The biggest problem with setups where so many people have guns is the town's lack of organization. It eventually ends up in a trollfest, where townies shoot each other, while the scum team sits in the background without attracting much attention. If you are town, don't forget to submit your vote for a 48 hour day cycle. If you shoot five minutes into the game, you will be shot day two. If you shoot within the first If you shoot without the town's consensus, you will be shot I don't care if you shoot a mafia player. If you break one of those three rules, you will be shot in return. I support a miller claim on day one. If they fail to claim on day one, then they get shot if they claim miller at any point after d1. Millers shouldn't claim night one as it assists the mafia team with blue sniping. It seems very unlikey that the mafia team has two godfather type roles. Based on the way the shot cooldown works, they would be able to day kill four consecutive days. Combined with the six night kills that come with their deaths and lynches, thats a 2:10 trade, assuming there isn't a SK or town night vig role. I like chaoser's plan of forcing certain players to shoot, but I wouldn't leave it up to them to decide their own target. By shooting early and often, the mafia godfather gets the most out of his role. We shouldn't allow a random player to shoot at will. Everyone pushing for an early shot right now is incredibly scummy, it is in towns best interest to not shoot immediately until we can review and make an informed post. There are a lot of people who still need to contribute making only 1 liners or no video posts, they need to start posting CONTENT. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 12 2012 13:26 chaoser wrote: Pretty sure 1) We'll run out of things to say or just go in circles 2) Ace will probably put a limit on like 48 hours and then we just "no shot" and move straight to night 3) Someone will probably get trigger happy and shoot anyway. I want gonzaw to shoot. We already had 24 hours of discussion since night 0 happened, we've got our suspicions. Let's go gonzaw, chop chop. Why do you think I'm scummy then? I won't shoot at least until half a day has passed and it's been consensus that I have to shoot. On June 12 2012 13:28 wherebugsgo wrote: please kill this guy, the bolded is scummy as hell ...no it isn't...? Anything constructive to say wbg? Could you at least post a semi-legitimate reason for thinking I'm scum? There are some "veteran" players I want to chime in soon (before someone shoots me and we end this thing too early). On June 12 2012 13:30 VisceraEyes wrote: FreelanceSatan was Coagulation. Factor that in. Yeah he was. Shouldn't have claimed VT with gun on N0 though, specially considering he seemed pretty townie. VE, what do you think about RoL and this uprising against me? On June 12 2012 05:20 supersoft wrote: because we probably got a LOT of blues. + In an optimal scenario, we really could benefit from a Millermassclaim D1 NOT N1.... Great supersoft, do you have anything to say about RoL's claim? Ehm, you can also chime in with this talk about me getting shot or shooting today. Ehh I still don't get why a lot of people want me dead now (rastaban seemed to jump on the wagon as well), but unless something definitive is brought I'll just ignore it for now. Not what I'd like for D1, but it brings discussion and forces people to take stances, so it's good. For instance rastaban, what are your thoughts on this? Meapak and kitaman are welcomed to post their thoughts as well. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On June 12 2012 13:36 wherebugsgo wrote: If we don't have a target for gonzaw to shoot by, say, the 20 hour mark into the day, I say we should shoot gonzaw. I volunteer to be that person. If anyone shoots before that time I say we kill them tomorrow. I am down with this. Though I think it's better if while we concurrently try to find a target for him that he also tries to find a target for himself so that if we can't find him a target, he will atleast have put out a "case" against someone that we can then analyze and shit. | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
On June 12 2012 13:36 wherebugsgo wrote: If we don't have a target for gonzaw to shoot by, say, the 20 hour mark into the day, I say we should shoot gonzaw. I volunteer to be that person. If anyone shoots before that time I say we kill them tomorrow. Now that I look at it, here's our 1st candidate for SK that didn't shoot last night. A wbg SK makes sense to me. He seems to just be trolling (posting pointless videos, one-liners, etc) and barely trying, and just wants to attack me at all costs without even stating reasoning behind it. Are you SK wbg? If I was going to be today's kill, would you agree to let someone else take the shot? | ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
| ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
:OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
mmmmmHHmmmmmmhmmhmhmhmhhmhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm I have a gun scum don't lurk. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On June 12 2012 13:51 gonzaw wrote: Now that I look at it, here's our 1st candidate for SK that didn't shoot last night. A wbg SK makes sense to me. He seems to just be trolling (posting pointless videos, one-liners, etc) and barely trying, and just wants to attack me at all costs without even stating reasoning behind it. Are you SK wbg? If I was going to be today's kill, would you agree to let someone else take the shot? so because I'm suspicious of you, there was only one shot last night, and I volunteered to shot your red ass, your first thought is for me to be SK? Pretty convoluted shit, it's nice to know only townies are capable of understanding Occam's Razor. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
If he's a townie he'll gladly make the necessary sacrifice, for the Town. Hommmmmmmmmmmmmmm | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
Anyway the idea of me being SK is ludicrous given that RoL claimed a hit, there was a kill, and I was roleblocked. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
On June 12 2012 13:56 VisceraEyes wrote: Had your gun taken away? Is that real? Did you just say that? :OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Yeah, interesting though. So the mafia have additional powers to take away a gun. Although this is interesting. If the mafia have the power to take away my gun why would they do that while trying to kill me? Someone tried to kill me and someone tried to take my gun. I can see why the SK would have that power, he is bulletproof at night but needs a way to survive day hits as well so that is definitely a possibility. I find it interesting that the SK would use that power on me since he needs as many people to die as fast as possible and taking my gun would just make me look a bit guilty. The only way that would make sense is if my first accusation was right and toad was the SK. That is essentially the purpose of that power. On the same note that would make the SK really powerful, but the set up makes him really weak to day shooting. I would say that would make up for the SK's shortcomings in the current set up so it is probably the most likely. On the otherhand the mafia has 4 members and I'm sure that could be a power that is functionally a day RB. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
| ||
