TL Mafia LV - Page 4

On May 29 2012 03:12 Hassybaby wrote:
Sorry guys, my friends and I have been enjoying the weather which has actually been good in England for a change (blah blah rain blah blah) and GSTL is distracting too.

I'd love to give my opinions about the cases, if someone can possibly point towards who the main guys are? I can see Wiggles and ET are options for leader, is there anyone else? And are there any other guys besides Toad for vice?

On May 29 2012 03:29 papapanda wrote:
Mmk
Hassy:
The VP and P elections are NOT separate. Meaning the second most vote automatically becomes VP.

Toad:
Like I said, I think you picking your partner(if that is how it works) is the best move from here.
But if you really ARE the mason, why would mafia kill the person who confirms you because only on his flip can the town know you are mod-confirmed?
I think I have a guess as to what you are doing but we can only wait and see.

Is the voting due in 5 hours?

On May 29 2012 03:51 strongandbig wrote:
Time for a little bit of analysis before I have to get back to work.

My Finger of Suspicion points currently at supersoft.



This is not a good town attitude. As has been discussed, these roles are super important for town - each of them can pretty much fuck up an entire cycle by denying town info, plus there's the mayor's double vote.



I <3 forumite and I agree that he's probably town, but this is a terrible plan. If everyone just votes for their "strongest town read" instead of for one of the actual candidates, then the votes are likely to get very spread out giving mafia a good chance to swing the election by coordinating, either to get one of them elected or just to avoid getting someone they're scared of or who's on the right track elected.



Lol. Kenpachi'd by the kenpachi copycat.

And in case anyone doesn't think this works, I got caught by BC with it in SS mafia. It does work, probably because claiming VT is suspicious and weird behavior that scum think they can gain towncred for by calling out.



This also is a bit of an odd post. Why does the fact that Toad claimed mason change SS's impression of his townplay? SS had some really strong reads on Toad, saying things like "I know your townplay." More importantly, SS's points on Toad were 100% right - saying "elect me because I'm unreadable" and "I will magically kill scum on day 1" like toad did are super suspicious! I tend to agree with many people that this leans towards Toad being third party. So why did SS back off here?

Also, how did we "force" Toad to claim anything? There was literally no reason for Toad to claim some kind of nonstandard target-changing un-roleblockable "manipulation-proof" (wtf?) mason role, as part of his campaign for Mayor.

This reads to me either like SS and Toad are scum buddies trying to distance themselves and got too far, or (more likely) like a scum SS saw an opportunity to gain town cred by making an actual good case on a player who was not being towny but wasn't on his scum team, then backing off when he realized that the presence of third parties like a lyncher hurts town and probably helps scum.

On May 29 2012 04:48 EchelonTee wrote:
Hmm... I doubt toad is scum, or 3rd party TBH. While I might not agree with his claim, and obviously I disagree with the whole "i want ET dead" thing, I don't think he's scum.

Toad, do you target your mason partner at night or at the start of the day?

On May 29 2012 05:08 VisceraEyes wrote:
Dude I totally didn't even realize that BH was gunning for grush too! /facepalm

Okay, yeah...that makes sense then. Like, if he had been the first to push a grush policy lynch then that would be one thing: proposing a weak policy lynch that's guaranteed to be shot down is easy as fuck for scum...but wholly unnecessary if someone has already run on the platform of killing grush.

On May 29 2012 05:22 EchelonTee wrote:
Something to note; almost all people have said "I would be down with killing Sinensis!". Some have said the same about SnB, but many have said "I am sort of suspicious, but want more info first".

Both bandwagons, but different in tone.

On May 29 2012 07:52 supersoft wrote:
by the way, I really don't understand, why you people never listen to me.
How can't you see that zealos is scum?! good god, that's so bitter.

On May 29 2012 09:07 Toadesstern wrote:
Sup. I think I'm going to use a random number generator to get the first "target". No matter if 3rd party, mafia or town the guy has to claim the mason thing if he wants to survive the day after seeing me flip and surely catching scum in a QT isn't bad either.

That being sad I want protection this night as I am HIGHLY likely to be shot. I don't care if it's a medic or a jailer because again, I'm roleblock-immune.
There's hardly a better place to put your protection this night.

If you want to make use of me protect me. I will be confirmed within 24 hours.

On May 29 2012 09:09 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

dumb. Mason someone you think is town.

On May 29 2012 09:17 Forumite wrote:
Yeah, I know, it´s just that when there were replacements in Holy Roman, it was mostly to make sure no scum had to be modkilled.

Seriously Kita, shape up.

Aren´t you overestimating your importance for town? I want you to survive the night and think you are a good target, but it´s up to the medics/jailors.

I suggest any jailors heavily consider protecting Toades, while medics find other targets, that should draw enough, but not too much, protection on Toades.

On May 29 2012 20:14 Forumite wrote:
Toades, I´m not sure if this is a dumb post or a very, very smart one.

Medics, protect Wiggles if you feel like it.

I don´t really blame Wiggles for lynching sinensis, Kita would have been a good candidate, but otherwise there wasn´t much alternative. A Zealos lynch might have been better but it never got much support, I guess it was too late in the day. There was very little discussion about other lynches, most people seemed fine with sinensis.