EPTTL Mafia LV - Page 38
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
EchelonTee
United States5256 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25557 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
BH, you're on JPG duty. I want 'em witty and I want 'em MSPainted. ET you're going to be the welcoming committee. I think individual greetings for each new player should suffice for now - we can increase the volume as needed. MZ, I want you on "scare replacements into activity" duty, because the last thing we need in here are inactives replacing inactives. Any questions? | ||
|
Manason
45 Posts
Anyway on with it. Mr. Wiggles and Toad are going to need protection most tonight. Mr. Wiggles moreso. Perhaps we should be focusing on people that aren't posting a lot? Or at least taking a closer look. The scum reads I've seen so far are only for people that have been actively posting and while more posts does help you when figuring out someones alignment, the smaller posts can be more telling. I'd also like to see a bit more sureness in your lynch possiblities Wiggles. While I understand you just lynched a townie and might be hesitant to be so quick to pounce on someone, I'd be curious to hear who's on your radar. | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
also wtf all our names are can be made into acronyms: BH, ET, MZ, VE  | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5256 Posts
On May 29 2012 11:40 Kenpachi wrote: ah.. time went by so fast. i wasnt sure who i wanted to vote for so i left to play Civ 5 and i realized hours went by pretty fast. That's cool. Do you still think Zealos is scummy? | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
jaj22
United Kingdom1376 Posts
On May 29 2012 11:17 Manason wrote: Perhaps we should be focusing on people that aren't posting a lot? Or at least taking a closer look. The scum reads I've seen so far are only for people that have been actively posting and while more posts does help you when figuring out someones alignment, the smaller posts can be more telling. Been staring at those, failed to find anything worth mentioning except papapanda's abdictation of responsibility on the Grush/Sinensis thing, which is probably in character for him. Honestly I'd be happy to kill anyone with fewer than five posts, because they're killing town. It's a long list. On May 29 2012 11:17 Manason wrote: I'd also like to see a bit more sureness in your lynch possiblities Wiggles. While I understand you just lynched a townie and might be hesitant to be so quick to pounce on someone, I'd be curious to hear who's on your radar. Why? He's just a guy with two votes. Who's on your radar? | ||
|
MidnightGladius
China1214 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5256 Posts
On May 29 2012 01:03 Kenpachi wrote: I like how this guy associates day 1 lurking to "could well be scum" (Hyaach). He also calls himself a bit lurky on day 1. PRETTY hypocritical. i feel hes just saying whatever he wants. The language is odd entirely in this post so lets look back into his posts. copycat! didnt even copy in flayvor (Arrsling) ... thats it. fuck i cant call him scum but ill still bring it to the front stage This indicated that you thought he was odd, but not quite scum. Is your opinion still the same Kenpachi? | ||
|
jaj22
United Kingdom1376 Posts
On May 29 2012 08:37 sToFu wrote: I would be more inclined to believe, at this point, that toad is lyncher. As far as scum goes, sinesis has acted incredibly suspiciously and ss just rubs me in the wrong way. I'm on my phone, so I'll write a more detailed response when I get home. Broken promise notification. On May 28 2012 08:19 phagga wrote: Not through the complete thread yet, will catch up later. I'm against a policy lynch, as I think everyone should get the chance to improve. I don't like how Toadesstern claimed, and feel against voting him therefore. He is either throwing away his blue role or fakeclaiming to get the major. Both is bad. I like Mr. Wiggles reasoning, he looks like a good candidate. The other interesting option is ET, but I will have to read through his filter again to feel more sure. Mr. Wiggles and ET, do you already have some candidates for your lynch? That's 28 hours ago. Unacceptable. | ||
|
Manason
45 Posts
On May 29 2012 12:53 jaj22 wrote: Been staring at those, failed to find anything worth mentioning except papapanda's abdictation of responsibility on the Grush/Sinensis thing, which is probably in character for him. Honestly I'd be happy to kill anyone with fewer than five posts, because they're killing town. It's a long list. Why? He's just a guy with two votes. Who's on your radar? I voted for Mr. Wiggles because I trusted that he would make a good lynch, so I'm curious as to who he would want to lynch because to be honest I don't have the time nor will power to sit here and analyze everyone. I'd rather someone who I know is better than me to be suspicious and then I can form my own opinion on the matter. The people on my radar I would rather not say because I have zero evidence to back up my claims other than pure intuition, which could be wrong. So no use making enemies when no one will believe me anyway. | ||
|
sToFu
United States189 Posts
On May 29 2012 13:04 jaj22 wrote: Picking some fights with lurkers: Broken promise notification. Do you still want it? | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5256 Posts
Yes. | ||
|
sToFu
United States189 Posts
Okay, typing up in word document now. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5256 Posts
Matty-Matty-chew, where are you? We've got some work to do now~ | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
sToFu
United States189 Posts
As a note: I'm fairly slow to give out a “scum judgment”, so I'll be indicating my degrees of trust. Also, everything is off the top of my head, so I probably missed things while skimming. I'd greatly appreciate being corrected if I say something blatantly wrong about a player (ie saying doesn't post at all when they did multiple times). Finally, I'm grouping people into general activity levels, seperating notable people. My judgments for each individual are obviously different, but not significant enough to make a difference in posting. Mattchew, hassybaby, phagga, Alderan, Cwave, GambitX32, MajuGarzett, MidnightGladius, papapanda, FrimTofu, meeple: They may or may not have posted, but I honestly can't say I remember anything said by these players (that was of any significance). No judgement. Sinensis – To be honest, I was ~70% confident that he was scum, and on my initial read through the thread, I read all his posts under the assumption that what he was saying was from the perspective of an invader. This probably resulted in slight changes in my perception of him and everyone that he commented on. What essentially damned him for me was his insistence on the lynching of grush, even after noticeable improvements. Hyaach, austinmcc – Nothing of note (off the top of my head). I do like that they are posting. No real judgement. Grush57 – Could have been policy lynched: promptly cleans up his act. I have a nagging feeling about him, but there's no solid argument that can be made about him. Zealos, jaj22, Forumite, MZ, VE – Neutral to town reads on all of these, with varying strength. Notably, VE and MZ have been quite forthright about their viewpoints, while Zealos and Forumite have been slightly more diplomatic. I do like that jaj22 is calling people out on broken promises. For Manason... I honestly can't remember much about him, though he (probably) belongs with this group. Kenpachi, Manason – Sorry, can't remember anything. I do know you two have been fairly active. Kita – For some reason, all I can really remember off the top of my head is odd and convoluted “analysis” and, after being pressured, a couple one-liners and no real response. I'll have to review those sections more carefully. ET – Even if his “we should all talk, including the noobies” spiel was most likely a PR move in order to appeal to the (apparently) large base of new players in this game, it is nevertheless an important point to make. I do like the fact that in his early argument with BH, he didn't get too emotional or involved. As others have said, I wouldn't be incredibly surprised to see him flip scum, but, at the same time, I believe that he is, by virtue of his actions, more likely to be town. This is reflected in my thought process in my vote post. Wiggles – Doing a lot right, not a lot wrong. Can't say much aside from strong town feeling, as reflected in my vote. However, he's being a little too diplomatic, which I find discomforting. BH – I'm not going to lie, your early tirade and fight against SnB and ET, as well as your early insistence of grush lynch, have appeared extremely suspicious. On the other hand, your newer actions reflect Toad, ss, snb – I dislike, but understand, snb's cessation of activity after his early fight with BH and the shadiness of his campaign for pardoner. While I understand and agree with the arguments against him, I can't help but think he deserves at least more time to provide better insight into his actual allegiance. Toad, ss – that awkward couple that keeps trying to keep dissociating (probably the wrong word :/) themselves from one another but can't seem to do it. Leaning scum. If you want a more detailed analysis on any one person, I'd be happy to do it tomorrow (too much homework left undone over Vet's weekend). | ||
|
MajuGarzett
Canada635 Posts
I disagree with you on BH's early actions. As BH was running for mayor it makes complete sense for him to try to prove to everyone that he will post constructively and not spam. Though he may have gotten overly engrossed in it I hardly see it as signs of being suspicious. It's not even as if he was responding to accusations of being scummy, just accusations of being a poor poster. | ||
| ||
