EPTOn May 28 2012 13:28 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
You just quoted the original post which had the red herring, I can't tell if you're dumb or scum.
Show nested quote +
On May 28 2012 13:01 Sinensis wrote:
I didn't compare them. Don't believe me? I'll show you:
I said I would much rather lose grush, A NON-ASSET, than a valuable town asset, LIKE WIGGLES.
There isn't a comparison there. Everything you have typed in the last 10 minutes has been unsubstantiated.
Thanks.
On May 28 2012 12:55 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Right back at you bro. You missed my point entirely. Comparing wiggles to grush is a red herring, if you can't see that then I really can't help you.
Also stating
is ridiculous. You lynch someone because they're scummy, not because you don't like them.
Nobody will be voting Sinensis, thank you in advance for your compliance.
On May 28 2012 12:47 Sinensis wrote:
That middle paragraph is what it sounds like when a point flies at high speed over someone's head. I have nothing to add other than: DUH. Of course wiggles isn't getting lynched today, because his posting is good. He is an asset to town, the opposite of what grush is.
And I'm not going to "drop it." That is my platform. You don't like it, don't vote for me. If I get elected mayor, grush is dying.
RE: grush
None of those 15 lurkers ruined my last game with poor play. Lurking has nothing to do with why I want you lynched.
On May 28 2012 12:36 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Dat attitude...
Also dat logic failure.
You lynch people for acting scummy, not because they fucked you over in the last game. You threw out a huge red herring there by comparing wiggles to grush. Unless wiggles decides to claim scum, I'd bet every penny I own he won't be lynched today. Why? Because wiggles has been posting clearly, coherently, and in a protown manner. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize wiggles is a bad lynch, we're in no danger of "losing him". You're attempting to policy lynch grush (for the record policy lynches are retarded), because he's bad, not because he's scummy. Nobody wants to policy lynch wiggles, thus comparing grush to someone like wiggles is like comparing apples to oranges.
If you want to bring an actual case about why grush is scum then please do, until then both you and blazinghand can drop it.
On May 28 2012 12:10 Sinensis wrote:
EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles.
EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles.
Dat attitude...
Also dat logic failure.
You lynch people for acting scummy, not because they fucked you over in the last game. You threw out a huge red herring there by comparing wiggles to grush. Unless wiggles decides to claim scum, I'd bet every penny I own he won't be lynched today. Why? Because wiggles has been posting clearly, coherently, and in a protown manner. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize wiggles is a bad lynch, we're in no danger of "losing him". You're attempting to policy lynch grush (for the record policy lynches are retarded), because he's bad, not because he's scummy. Nobody wants to policy lynch wiggles, thus comparing grush to someone like wiggles is like comparing apples to oranges.
If you want to bring an actual case about why grush is scum then please do, until then both you and blazinghand can drop it.
That middle paragraph is what it sounds like when a point flies at high speed over someone's head. I have nothing to add other than: DUH. Of course wiggles isn't getting lynched today, because his posting is good. He is an asset to town, the opposite of what grush is.
And I'm not going to "drop it." That is my platform. You don't like it, don't vote for me. If I get elected mayor, grush is dying.
RE: grush
None of those 15 lurkers ruined my last game with poor play. Lurking has nothing to do with why I want you lynched.
Right back at you bro. You missed my point entirely. Comparing wiggles to grush is a red herring, if you can't see that then I really can't help you.
Also stating
If I get elected mayor, grush is dying.
is ridiculous. You lynch someone because they're scummy, not because you don't like them.
Nobody will be voting Sinensis, thank you in advance for your compliance.
I didn't compare them. Don't believe me? I'll show you:
On May 28 2012 12:10 Sinensis wrote:
EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles.
EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles.
I said I would much rather lose grush, A NON-ASSET, than a valuable town asset, LIKE WIGGLES.
There isn't a comparison there. Everything you have typed in the last 10 minutes has been unsubstantiated.
Thanks.
You just quoted the original post which had the red herring, I can't tell if you're dumb or scum.
Must be dumb then if those are my only two options. So what makes my post a red herring other than that I compared grush and wiggles, which I didn't do in the first place?
