|
On May 18 2012 05:51 austinmcc wrote:
I don't like those as "fluff" though. He's not really filling a filter to make himself look active, there's no intent on his part to do anything other than be modkilled. Gah.
Also, i SWORE there was some post from him about his location saying Singapore but him being in ... Germany? Did I entirely make that up? Anyone remember that from any player?
it was Shaopi
|
On May 18 2012 05:46 Unforgiven_ve wrote:
I think OP demostrated he wasnt going to kill anyone directly at the end of the day, he gave 1 warning, so i think he was feeling safe.
Yup, you're right.
|
On May 18 2012 05:51 austinmcc wrote:
I don't like those as "fluff" though. He's not really filling a filter to make himself look active, there's no intent on his part to do anything other than be modkilled. Gah.
Also, i SWORE there was some post from him about his location saying Singapore but him being in ... Germany? Did I entirely make that up? Anyone remember that from any player?
I don't know. I vaguley recall something like that, but it's not in his filter.
To me, it's a relative term. Fluff for someone like him is a simple one-line post that doesn't contribute anything to the conversation going on at the time. The majority of his small filter is like that.
|
On May 18 2012 05:44 Unforgiven_ve wrote:
Dammit, i was writing a large post and power went out -.-. let me summarize
Hyaach: you can see on Mufaa's filter that he did not attacked me because i was the first telling i was suspicions on him. I belive he did this because he didnt wanted to attrack more attention to him form the people who had a FoS on him. I think this is a normal play by a mafia.
Besides this one argument i would like to know another reasons to suspect me (like austin strangely said, maybe to start some new bandwagon?)
The reason we are calling you out is because of your post count/content. Lately it seems like there are 3 people who pop on to post their required 1 vote a day then log off and not contribute. Can you see how that would come across as suspicious?
Also, I would like to know what prompted this from you
+ Show Spoiler +On May 17 2012 03:11 Unforgiven_ve wrote:
i knew it!!! i was right since the beggining of the game.
does that bother you austin?
im not taking any chances now
##Vote austinmcc
When you didn't have him on your list at the beginning of the game.
Here is your first list of scumreads:
+ Show Spoiler +On May 12 2012 00:21 Unforgiven_ve wrote:I have a couple reads taking some shape. My four main suspects so far are, Anacletus(for obvious reasons), Mufaa (being very passive, maybe i dont belive his works excuses), Shaopi (super active at first, then just defending his BIG list and a couple post naming Broodking) and Jailbraker (2 post, whitout much information, Show nested quote +I'm going to withhold my vote until later when everyone has a chance to post everybody already posted and im still waiting, and Show nested quote +
posting this now, going to formulate a new post based on BroodKingEXE, ShiaoPi, Hyaach (page 7 to 8)
and being under the radar in general) Im gonna wait a couple more hours to cast my vote, i want to see if everyone goes active and chatty and the end of the day
What are you trying to say here? Why is there a blatant contradiction? Why, when looking through your filter, you seem to post that you suspect everyone in the game, but not offer any real information up?
|
Also, I would like to remind people that we are now under the 2 hour mark. Tofu - If you have a case against me, make it, otherwise, we need to discuss a vote candidate. Austin - Based on my/your suspicions about Hyaach, or the response (or lack thereof) from Unforgiven - Are you committed to a vote on one of those 2?
Anacletus: I know you are feeling pretty helpless right now, but the best thing you could do right now is to get on and actually contribute. Read my last few posts directed to you and get on. Some contribution from you is better than a /suicide in this game.
I feel like we are missing someone's vote, whom hasn't voted yet?
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
Day 3 Vote Count
Anacletus(2): BioSC, Anacletus, Crossfire99
austinmcc(2): Unforgiven_ve, Hyaach
Hyaach(1): austinmcc
Not Voting: FirmTofu, BioSC
Just under 2 hours left to vote
|
I've read and continue to read every post. I actually spend quite a bit of time reading TL in general and have this thread subscribed and read it almost instantly when it gets updated.
I have nothing to add.
|
1.) + Show Spoiler +On May 18 2012 06:02 BioSC wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2012 05:44 Unforgiven_ve wrote:
Dammit, i was writing a large post and power went out -.-. let me summarize
Hyaach: you can see on Mufaa's filter that he did not attacked me because i was the first telling i was suspicions on him. I belive he did this because he didnt wanted to attrack more attention to him form the people who had a FoS on him. I think this is a normal play by a mafia.
Besides this one argument i would like to know another reasons to suspect me (like austin strangely said, maybe to start some new bandwagon?) The reason we are calling you out is because of your post count/content. Lately it seems like there are 3 people who pop on to post their required 1 vote a day then log off and not contribute. Can you see how that would come across as suspicious? Also, I would like to know what prompted this from you + Show Spoiler +On May 17 2012 03:11 Unforgiven_ve wrote:
i knew it!!! i was right since the beggining of the game.
does that bother you austin?
im not taking any chances now
##Vote austinmcc When you didn't have him on your list at the beginning of the game. Here is your first list of scumreads: + Show Spoiler +On May 12 2012 00:21 Unforgiven_ve wrote:I have a couple reads taking some shape. My four main suspects so far are, Anacletus(for obvious reasons), Mufaa (being very passive, maybe i dont belive his works excuses), Shaopi (super active at first, then just defending his BIG list and a couple post naming Broodking) and Jailbraker (2 post, whitout much information, Show nested quote +I'm going to withhold my vote until later when everyone has a chance to post everybody already posted and im still waiting, and Show nested quote +
posting this now, going to formulate a new post based on BroodKingEXE, ShiaoPi, Hyaach (page 7 to 8)
and being under the radar in general) Im gonna wait a couple more hours to cast my vote, i want to see if everyone goes active and chatty and the end of the day What are you trying to say here? Why is there a blatant contradiction? Why, when looking through your filter, you seem to post that you suspect everyone in the game, but not offer any real information up?
You said it? AT THE BEGGINING of the game, please, dont quote if you are not gonna read all the filter and take it out of context, i clearly said:
My suspicions on Anacletus RAISED big time, but he's not my main read tho. In case i get killed (but i doubt it after this) my FoS goes to austincc.
I feel he is actually playing whit the town's "mind", he (both times) just goes super agressive on someone and gets lynched right away, he's using his good redaction skills to throw analysis at the end of both days. I will quote nothing, im gonna stick whit this, its pretty obvious for me now.
About anacletus im beliving now he's just a bad player who got lucky two times. Watch his filter and see the big difference on his posting now.
##FoS austincc and Anacletus
2.) + Show Spoiler + Why, when looking through your filter, you seem to post that you suspect everyone in the game, but not offer any real information up?
My response, something i have alrewady posted too. : you dont see me posting LONG DEPTH ANALYSIS because we havent had much to work on, besides lame reads based of a couple posts, i want to base my suspicions on actions, how people behave and voting patterns. (i confess, i thought this game were the kind in wich you get subtle clues and histories for night actions.)
ALL of us just hadn't much information, just now we have a few things to base our cases, as i just said, i was (hardly) writign a big post and the fxxing power went out.
|
Not Voting: Darkfirex5, FirmTofu, BioSC
uh?
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
Lol, I knew something looked wrong 
|
On May 15 2012 08:07 Darkfirex5 wrote:
well guys gl hf i died (sadface) geting hanged is not a fun way to go D:
wtf?
|
Anacletus, do you just not care at all in this game?
|
Unforgiven, let's just go with this, from the start of today:
On May 17 2012 03:11 Unforgiven_ve wrote:
i knew it!!! i was right since the beggining of the game.
does that bother you austin?
im not taking any chances now
##Vote austinmcc
Specifically, WHAT are you saying you were right about?
|
On May 18 2012 06:19 Crossfire99 wrote:
Anacletus, do you just not care at all in this game?
On May 17 2012 13:45 Anacletus wrote:
I'm not giving up on trying to win. I just figure by the way you guys are playing that I'm more of a liability than anything. So why not just get this done now for a higher chance of winning later.
Not defending one's self doesn't equate to how one acts.
Thank you for taking the time to read my posts. This quote is from yesterday so either you didn't read it or just forgot. Please don't accuse me of things such as ruining the game purposefully or not caring.
|
Sorry, I missed that post. I just got this vibe from your posts that I misinterpreted. So you honestly believe suicide is the right way to go?
|
Sorry, i see i didnt specify that, i mean about Mufaa being a scum
1.- May 12 My four main suspects so far are, Anacletus(for obvious reasons), Mufaa (being very passive, maybe i dont belive his works excuses)...
2.- May 13 You can see im not the only one suspecting of Mufaa, im just not buying that kind of "clean play", no time to play, a couple of long depth analysis post, go back to lurk and come whit another "great" analysis.
3.- May 13 (again) My list in case i die.
suspicious of mufaa, jailbreaker, crossfire because at the time they hadn't really posted
4.- May 15
My top 3:
austincc
Anacletus
Dahdum/Mufaa/Hyaach maybe bio/crossfire
Before that i said i need to read more camly all the post to get a 3rd suspect.
I just didn't found something good to really focus on a 3rd person.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On May 18 2012 06:14 Unforgiven_ve wrote:1.) + Show Spoiler +On May 18 2012 06:02 BioSC wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2012 05:44 Unforgiven_ve wrote:
Dammit, i was writing a large post and power went out -.-. let me summarize
Hyaach: you can see on Mufaa's filter that he did not attacked me because i was the first telling i was suspicions on him. I belive he did this because he didnt wanted to attrack more attention to him form the people who had a FoS on him. I think this is a normal play by a mafia.
Besides this one argument i would like to know another reasons to suspect me (like austin strangely said, maybe to start some new bandwagon?) The reason we are calling you out is because of your post count/content. Lately it seems like there are 3 people who pop on to post their required 1 vote a day then log off and not contribute. Can you see how that would come across as suspicious? Also, I would like to know what prompted this from you + Show Spoiler +On May 17 2012 03:11 Unforgiven_ve wrote:
i knew it!!! i was right since the beggining of the game.
does that bother you austin?
im not taking any chances now
##Vote austinmcc When you didn't have him on your list at the beginning of the game. Here is your first list of scumreads: + Show Spoiler +On May 12 2012 00:21 Unforgiven_ve wrote:I have a couple reads taking some shape. My four main suspects so far are, Anacletus(for obvious reasons), Mufaa (being very passive, maybe i dont belive his works excuses), Shaopi (super active at first, then just defending his BIG list and a couple post naming Broodking) and Jailbraker (2 post, whitout much information, Show nested quote +I'm going to withhold my vote until later when everyone has a chance to post everybody already posted and im still waiting, and Show nested quote +
posting this now, going to formulate a new post based on BroodKingEXE, ShiaoPi, Hyaach (page 7 to 8)
and being under the radar in general) Im gonna wait a couple more hours to cast my vote, i want to see if everyone goes active and chatty and the end of the day What are you trying to say here? Why is there a blatant contradiction? Why, when looking through your filter, you seem to post that you suspect everyone in the game, but not offer any real information up? You said it? AT THE BEGGINING of the game, please, dont quote if you are not gonna read all the filter and take it out of context, i clearly said: Show nested quote +My suspicions on Anacletus RAISED big time, but he's not my main read tho. In case i get killed (but i doubt it after this) my FoS goes to austincc.
I feel he is actually playing whit the town's "mind", he (both times) just goes super agressive on someone and gets lynched right away, he's using his good redaction skills to throw analysis at the end of both days. I will quote nothing, im gonna stick whit this, its pretty obvious for me now.
About anacletus im beliving now he's just a bad player who got lucky two times. Watch his filter and see the big difference on his posting now.
##FoS austincc and Anacletus 2.) + Show Spoiler + Why, when looking through your filter, you seem to post that you suspect everyone in the game, but not offer any real information up? My response, something i have alrewady posted too. : Show nested quote +you dont see me posting LONG DEPTH ANALYSIS because we havent had much to work on, besides lame reads based of a couple posts, i want to base my suspicions on actions, how people behave and voting patterns. (i confess, i thought this game were the kind in wich you get subtle clues and histories for night actions.) ALL of us just hadn't much information, just now we have a few things to base our cases, as i just said, i was (hardly) writign a big post and the fxxing power went out.
Unforgiven's post.
I'm taking nothing out of context. I'm reading what YOU said, which is that:
On May 17 2012 03:11 Unforgiven_ve wrote:
i knew it!!! i was right since the beggining of the game.
does that bother you austin?
im not taking any chances now
##Vote austinmcc
Now, I looked through your filter, trust me. I found both of those posts. The post YOU linked/quoted:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=334707¤tpage=21#406
I found that on page 21 of the thread. Want to know where I found the quote I did?
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=334707¤tpage=10#199
Page 10.
You tell me what post would be closer to "The beginning of the game"
My question still stands. What are you trying to say with that quote, and WHY is there a contradiction?
To your second half of your post: We need reads from you. You've offered next to nothing. Making reads and sharing them with town is how the town figures out who is/isn't scum. Care to make a read on someone? Why is Austin your #1, when "At the beginning of the game" you didn't suspect him, contradicting your claim to the post you made earlier in the day?
|
But i guess Mufaa's play worked, he never attacked me so i got distracted whit other targets. Something i feel a couple more players are doing right now
|
I'm content dropping that post and this back and forth because I don't think it really gets us any useful information.
So instead, are you still fully happy with voting me? Regardless of whether you are or aren't, are there other targets you'd be willing to vote for?
|
+ Show Spoiler +On May 18 2012 06:28 BioSC wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On May 18 2012 06:14 Unforgiven_ve wrote:1.) + Show Spoiler +On May 18 2012 06:02 BioSC wrote:Show nested quote +On May 18 2012 05:44 Unforgiven_ve wrote:
Dammit, i was writing a large post and power went out -.-. let me summarize
Hyaach: you can see on Mufaa's filter that he did not attacked me because i was the first telling i was suspicions on him. I belive he did this because he didnt wanted to attrack more attention to him form the people who had a FoS on him. I think this is a normal play by a mafia.
Besides this one argument i would like to know another reasons to suspect me (like austin strangely said, maybe to start some new bandwagon?) The reason we are calling you out is because of your post count/content. Lately it seems like there are 3 people who pop on to post their required 1 vote a day then log off and not contribute. Can you see how that would come across as suspicious? Also, I would like to know what prompted this from you + Show Spoiler +On May 17 2012 03:11 Unforgiven_ve wrote:
i knew it!!! i was right since the beggining of the game.
does that bother you austin?
im not taking any chances now
##Vote austinmcc When you didn't have him on your list at the beginning of the game. Here is your first list of scumreads: + Show Spoiler +On May 12 2012 00:21 Unforgiven_ve wrote:I have a couple reads taking some shape. My four main suspects so far are, Anacletus(for obvious reasons), Mufaa (being very passive, maybe i dont belive his works excuses), Shaopi (super active at first, then just defending his BIG list and a couple post naming Broodking) and Jailbraker (2 post, whitout much information, Show nested quote +I'm going to withhold my vote until later when everyone has a chance to post everybody already posted and im still waiting, and Show nested quote +
posting this now, going to formulate a new post based on BroodKingEXE, ShiaoPi, Hyaach (page 7 to 8)
and being under the radar in general) Im gonna wait a couple more hours to cast my vote, i want to see if everyone goes active and chatty and the end of the day What are you trying to say here? Why is there a blatant contradiction? Why, when looking through your filter, you seem to post that you suspect everyone in the game, but not offer any real information up? You said it? AT THE BEGGINING of the game, please, dont quote if you are not gonna read all the filter and take it out of context, i clearly said: Show nested quote +My suspicions on Anacletus RAISED big time, but he's not my main read tho. In case i get killed (but i doubt it after this) my FoS goes to austincc.
I feel he is actually playing whit the town's "mind", he (both times) just goes super agressive on someone and gets lynched right away, he's using his good redaction skills to throw analysis at the end of both days. I will quote nothing, im gonna stick whit this, its pretty obvious for me now.
About anacletus im beliving now he's just a bad player who got lucky two times. Watch his filter and see the big difference on his posting now.
##FoS austincc and Anacletus 2.) + Show Spoiler + Why, when looking through your filter, you seem to post that you suspect everyone in the game, but not offer any real information up? My response, something i have alrewady posted too. : Show nested quote +you dont see me posting LONG DEPTH ANALYSIS because we havent had much to work on, besides lame reads based of a couple posts, i want to base my suspicions on actions, how people behave and voting patterns. (i confess, i thought this game were the kind in wich you get subtle clues and histories for night actions.) ALL of us just hadn't much information, just now we have a few things to base our cases, as i just said, i was (hardly) writign a big post and the fxxing power went out. Unforgiven's post. I'm taking nothing out of context. I'm reading what YOU said, which is that: Show nested quote +On May 17 2012 03:11 Unforgiven_ve wrote:
i knew it!!! i was right since the beggining of the game.
does that bother you austin?
im not taking any chances now
##Vote austinmcc Now, I looked through your filter, trust me. I found both of those posts. The post YOU linked/quoted: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=334707¤tpage=21#406I found that on page 21 of the thread. Want to know where I found the quote I did? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=334707¤tpage=10#199Page 10. You tell me what post would be closer to "The beginning of the game" My question still stands. What are you trying to say with that quote, and WHY is there a contradiction? To your second half of your post: We need reads from you. You've offered next to nothing. Making reads and sharing them with town is how the town figures out who is/isn't scum. Care to make a read on someone? Why is Austin your #1, when "At the beginning of the game" you didn't suspect him, contradicting your claim to the post you made earlier in the day?
uh? i dont think im really understanding what you are saying. I'll try and make it clear... at first i haven't suspected austin because (as i have said a LOT of times) we hadn't much to work on. After 2 days and seeing the result of austin "Leader role" i grow suspicious of him since page 10-11/whatever? Thats the idea if the game right? try to READ people, not sticking whit your first and sole list
as you can read at page 21 I feel he is actually playing whit the town's "mind", he (both times) just goes super agressive on someone and gets lynched right away, he's using his good redaction skills to throw analysis at the end of both days. I will quote nothing, im gonna stick whit this, its pretty obvious for me now.
About anacletus im beliving now he's just a bad player who got lucky two times. Watch his filter and see the big difference on his posting now.
##FoS austincc and Anacletus
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
