|
EBWOP:
But they will have 5 votes each. That means scum will need 6 votes in total to accomplish that (or well, less votes if they lied about who they voted in the first place).
That's the only way sandro can be lynched. If not then we just don't do shit and let VE die alone
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On May 02 2012 11:50 wherebugsgo wrote: if everyone but sandro/VE have 7 votes, then putting sandro/VE at 8 will kill like six townies at once. It's very likely the majority list has 4 mafia in it, so I wouldn't be worried about that.
|
see the thing is that if Cephiro is scum, let's say, and we put votes on VE to bring him to par with sandro, Cephiro can save both players by going 3/2 on sandro/ve or something like that.
The names are arbitrary but Radfield hasn't claimed his votes yet either from what I can tell.
|
On May 02 2012 11:51 gonzaw wrote: EBWOP:
But they will have 5 votes each. That means scum will need 6 votes in total to accomplish that (or well, less votes if they lied about who they voted in the first place).
That's the only way sandro can be lynched. If not then we just don't do shit and let VE die alone
This was my intent. If you're so sure I'm scum, why is just killing one scum such a fucking travesty?
IT'S NOT!
FEAR!!!
|
On May 02 2012 11:52 wherebugsgo wrote: see the thing is that if Cephiro is scum, let's say, and we put votes on VE to bring him to par with sandro, Cephiro can save both players by going 3/2 on sandro/ve or something like that.
The names are arbitrary but Radfield hasn't claimed his votes yet either from what I can tell.
I am certainly not going to vote for sandro. So.. who are you voting for? Or don't feel like sharing?
|
On May 02 2012 11:54 Cephiro wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2012 11:52 wherebugsgo wrote: see the thing is that if Cephiro is scum, let's say, and we put votes on VE to bring him to par with sandro, Cephiro can save both players by going 3/2 on sandro/ve or something like that.
The names are arbitrary but Radfield hasn't claimed his votes yet either from what I can tell. I am certainly not going to vote for sandro. So.. who are you voting for? Or don't feel like sharing?
tell me who you're voting.
I'm talking it out with foolishness right now, my votes are going down in the next 1-2 minutes.
|
On May 02 2012 11:55 wherebugsgo wrote: tell me who you're voting.
I'm talking it out with foolishness right now, my votes are going down in the next 1-2 minutes.
I guess we have a situation where we both want to know each others votes first, don't we?
|
On May 02 2012 11:56 Cephiro wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2012 11:55 wherebugsgo wrote: tell me who you're voting.
I'm talking it out with foolishness right now, my votes are going down in the next 1-2 minutes. I guess we have a situation where we both want to know each others votes first, don't we?
no, fuck you. Read the damn spreadsheet.
|
|
I think we should also come up with a "safe" formula.
Like, if there are N people in the majority, it takes X votes for a player to be completely safe from the lynch (again just like in the manga they needed 51 to be safe).
That way we don't go overboard with votes (for instance why does Meapak have 9 votes on him in the spreadsheet?)
|
On May 02 2012 11:59 gonzaw wrote: I think we should also come up with a "safe" formula.
Like, if there are N people in the majority, it takes X votes for a player to be completely safe from the lynch (again just like in the manga they needed 51 to be safe).
That way we don't go overboard with votes (for instance why does Meapak have 9 votes on him in the spreadsheet?)
(Total Amount Of Votes / Amount of people in Majority) + 1 = 100% Safe limit.
Which at the moment is (90/10)+1 = 10 votes.
|
Okay, I'm gonna go eat and come back in a few minutes. I guess Protact will have quite a time counting all votes and shit.
I find it worrying that there are so many votes missing though, it's likely Radfield can get lynched too.
|
69 of the votes have been claimed to have gone somewhere specific.
There are 5 votes that we know have gone toward Radfield/Wiggles and a third person (these are syllo's votes)
There's 1 vote that chaoser didn't claim.
There's 15 votes between Radfield/sandro/prplhz that have not been claimed.
|
I did claim it WBG...I said it was to motbob/meapak
|
To: wherebugsgo [ Profile | Buddy | Report ] Subject: Re: hey Date: 5/2/12 09:59 i gave my last vote to motbob is great.meapak. sorry for the massf pms haha, i'm just sending messages as i go along
|
ah my bad. I've been getting so many messages that I just keep forgetting things.
70 claimed votes and 5 from syllo, that leaves just those 3 players.
Everyone who is at 9 is safe, and I think everyone who is at 8 is also safe (because there are players who are at 7 and below)
|
Wait what? Radfield is about to die? That's no good.
|
Radfield has votes from syllo, so he's not actually at 4.
|
Deadline passed right? I want to know if I'm f5'ing in vain or not.
|
Okay I'm back, so how did the votes ended up in the end?
|
|
|
|