|
Now that I have looked through some filters, I retract my suspicions on NT and want to point out Mementoss:
First of all, I have played some games with Mementoss, and the uncaring behaviour of his
On May 03 2012 08:44 Mementoss wrote:
Sup?
Im not dealing with this shit this game.
##Vote: Kenpachi
##Vote: BillMurrary
Either will do
does absolutely not match with his townplay. As townie, he is one of the leaders who gets quickly killed off by scum.
That what he is pulling of is definitely not townlike.
Many of his posts are useless one-liners, and those which are not have almost no content and are wishywashy. A big analysis is not necessary, you can see his lack of real contributions for yourself.
layabout and mementoss are now my biggest scum suspects.
|
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/TwTYK.png)
We're coming for you next bulbb...
-D
|
|
|
On May 06 2012 00:33 blubbdavid wrote:
Is that you, Hassy?
It may of been heavily influenced by him
-D
|
|
|
|
|
Eiii I want you to post more now if you can please.
|
On May 06 2012 00:37 blubbdavid wrote:
My scum sensor.
It appears to be broken then
-D
|
On May 05 2012 11:17 PaqMan wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On May 05 2012 05:43 layabout wrote:Katina few posts have been critical of the disruptive play at the beginning, and acted to stamp out the bad. Show nested quote +On May 03 2012 08:00 Katina wrote:On May 03 2012 07:22 SomethingAwesome wrote:On May 03 2012 07:18 blubbdavid wrote:
Haha, we have two scumslips already.
Maybe you don't know but the role PM's for vanilla townie were sent in normal font. modkill for role PM shit? idk how to answer this without breaking rules.. you are scum... all townies will know this -mattchew You are pretty quick be calling people scum Katina Implies that the "blub scumslip affair" is stupid (it was) by implying that the accusations are rather hastily made (which further implies that they are poorly thought out) Show nested quote +On May 03 2012 08:11 Katina wrote:On May 03 2012 08:02 Blazinghand wrote:On May 03 2012 08:00 Katina wrote:On May 03 2012 07:22 SomethingAwesome wrote:On May 03 2012 07:18 blubbdavid wrote:
Haha, we have two scumslips already.
Maybe you don't know but the role PM's for vanilla townie were sent in normal font. modkill for role PM shit? idk how to answer this without breaking rules.. you are scum... all townies will know this -mattchew You are pretty quick be calling people scum Is that your whole contribution to the thread? Please, so overwhelming! Stop contributing so much! I am being sarcastic because this sentence alone that is vaguely, VAGUELY criticizering SA is far less than he has done all game for town. Game just started honey. You are so quick to run to his defense... katina points out that BH is being a big drama queen. Show nested quote +On May 03 2012 08:32 Katina wrote:On May 03 2012 08:15 Blazinghand wrote:On May 03 2012 08:14 blubbdavid wrote:
Btw, I sense some kind of BlazingKenpachi party. Didn't work out so great in Aperture Mafia. On May 03 2012 08:11 Katina wrote:On May 03 2012 08:02 Blazinghand wrote:On May 03 2012 08:00 Katina wrote:On May 03 2012 07:22 SomethingAwesome wrote:On May 03 2012 07:18 blubbdavid wrote:
Haha, we have two scumslips already.
Maybe you don't know but the role PM's for vanilla townie were sent in normal font. modkill for role PM shit? idk how to answer this without breaking rules.. you are scum... all townies will know this -mattchew You are pretty quick be calling people scum Is that your whole contribution to the thread? Please, so overwhelming! Stop contributing so much! I am being sarcastic because this sentence alone that is vaguely, VAGUELY criticizering SA is far less than he has done all game for town. Game just started honey. You are so quick to run to his defense... You're still not contributing, and being indirect. You're scum. ##unvote
##vote: Katinacome at me bro Not contributing? The game started a couple hours ago.... There hasn't been time. Indirect? Last I checked I was pretty direct with SA. Katina points out that the game is hours old and that there has not been time to contribute in response to BH's vote on her for not contributing. Show nested quote +On May 04 2012 05:05 Katina wrote:On May 04 2012 04:15 grush57 wrote:On May 04 2012 03:39 blubbdavid wrote:
I am still waiting for grush to be useful. But going through his filter in other games, my hopes will be smited.
Palmar looks like a good lynch candidate too, because he 1) isn't townielike, 2) isn't making much sense 3) voted for me without reasoning.
I assume we still have 24h+ for voting? Common atleast my useless posts are funny unlike yours. Plus, you didn't understand the situation of that game I played(I'm the same role this game too). Anyways, I'm not sure what to make of the last 3 pages. It is full of useless posts and spam and Bill Murray didn't even start yet. Several posts saying nothing except that "I'm town, trust me i gotta go.... eat?" (Like this post except im not hungry atm :D) For my reasoning of Katina vote, the game just started and blazinghand was accusing Katina for his scumminess, and I agreed so I voted for him, plus I wanted to get the ball rolling. Granted, I realize now this was a dumbshit move that was scummy,and that is my horrible reasoning for it. If you don't like it, Sorry. I would vote you blubbdavid, but I have enough people witchhunting me now.(And I didn't even rage on ladder how unlucky am I?) Though, I could just filter and quote everything and that would get the job done. I like that. BH throws around empty accusations and you jump right on board with this. Looks like a case of something called "Sheeping" Don't worry, it's curable! BM has been not been his usual posting self lately. He likes to lurk when he is Mafia. He made a few brief posts early on then disappeared into La La land. So that is something to keep an eye on. I don't like the whole idea of all the vote switching that has been going on here. It's not helpful to the town and brings nothing but confusion and chaos to everyone else. I know it's only day one but at least try to have more than one sentence before getting voting happy. Criticises grush for sheeping a baseless vote. Points out how destructive the "lets all vote for no real reason" is and tells the perpetrators to stop. If Katrina does anything suspicious it is the way in which she puts attention on BM. She tells us that he tend to lurk when he is mafia that he posted earlier and is now lurking. He isn't lurking at the moment. Lurking is playing passively, posting infrequently or posting with consistently low content. BM is inactive in this game since these are his only posts: + Show Spoiler +On May 03 2012 06:46 Bill Murray wrote:
I will extend the day and shorten the next night by one hour. Good luck and have fun.
Nobody died yet.
But don't worry.
what and yet.... On May 03 2012 06:46 Bill Murray wrote:
extended days?!
hurray! Both of which of from the very beginning of the game Just curious, but what was the point of that post layabout? Nobody was discussing her so it seemed kind of random for you to make that analysis.
On May 05 2012 05:15 slOosh wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2012 05:10 layabout wrote:Katina has made posts indicative of intelligence. I do not think we should lynch katina. Do other people think that this is BS? On May 05 2012 04:46 SomethingAwesome wrote:
I don't really like layabout much. His inconsistency and lacking response to why his policy lynch is now a good option compared to earlier. The generic first post as pointed out by myself and better pointed out by DoYouHas. If he want to kill us why not vote us instead of steering town towards a werd policy lynch on BM.
(I'm not defending BM. Don't care if he live or die so far)
##Vote Layabout
//Dirk Why is SA's post BS? And where does katina make posts indicative of intelligence and how does it show a town alignment?
discussion of katina:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14591170
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14591786
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14591832
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=14592117
My post doesn't say why i thought she was town in fact i just wanted to say that her posts made sense and i didn't want to kill somebody that was making sense when there were so many players that weren't making sense or even playing the game.
|
we should kill Palmar tomorrow
|
We should kill you tomorrow layabout
:3
|
On May 06 2012 00:24 blubbdavid wrote:Now that I have looked through some filters, I retract my suspicions on NT and want to point out Mementoss: First of all, I have played some games with Mementoss, and the uncaring behaviour of his Show nested quote +On May 03 2012 08:44 Mementoss wrote:
Sup?
Im not dealing with this shit this game.
##Vote: Kenpachi
##Vote: BillMurrary
Either will do does absolutely not match with his townplay. As townie, he is one of the leaders who gets quickly killed off by scum. That what he is pulling of is definitely not townlike. Many of his posts are useless one-liners, and those which are not have almost no content and are wishywashy. A big analysis is not necessary, you can see his lack of real contributions for yourself.layabout and mementoss are now my biggest scum suspects.
Would you like to explain why you retract your suspicions on NT? Is it just because of your new-found suspicions on me? He hasn't done anything spectactularly townie at this point. This was my first post of the game, and since you weren't in LIII I guess you don't understand my frustration with this. The point is, it was more of a joke than a serious statement, which can be seen if you read my filter. Actually the fact that a chance came up for a policy lynch on BM that I didn't jump on should show that. Also the fact how I stated it was ridiculous that a policy lynch was created by someone who shoudln't be trusted (layabout) and that many people jumped on without reason.
I pushed my reads on day 1, Grush and NT, and I tried to pressure people to post their respective reads rather than just sit around. The fact that you can't even put together more of a half ass case on me makes me wonder if your just posting this case, to make it look like you're doing something. The italicized part isn't true, and the fact that you can't back it up with facts proves my point of you half assing a case.
Also, great layabout is one of your biggest scum suspects. Why was that? Oh wait, your just saying it because its a popular opinion at the moment. The fact that you are saying plenty of things, without any explanation (NT not suspicious, half case on me, layabout biggest scum read) makes you very non-transparent and makes you look like you are posting for the sake of posting.
I will be re-going over the thread/specific players and posting my reads before nights end.
|
On May 06 2012 00:38 slOosh wrote:
Eiii I want you to post more now if you can please.
Hi there! I don't really like posting or having big discussions at night, but it seems like the rest of town doesn't feel the same way.
Well, this gets my one-post-per-cycle requirement out of the way, at least. See you in a few hours!
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
Man this situation just makes me want to eat my own heart
|
On May 05 2012 23:03 BlackRaven wrote:Yo jdub, mind telling me your thoughts now? Show nested quote +On May 05 2012 06:00 johnnywup wrote:
not really, we're lynching for being anti-town regardless of allignment, anyone who voted to lynch him shouldn't get any credibility. Still feel that way about credibility? Because that shoots yours out the window as well. :3
Yeah, I don't care. He's anti-town, but he was town. So no, I wouldn't judge anyone differently because they were on the lynch unless they ninja voted. He's anti town and I wanted him dead. Others may feel the same. That doesn't really have to do with their alignment. No one should be credited or discredited because of this lynch.
On May 06 2012 03:21 Eiii wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2012 00:38 slOosh wrote:
Eiii I want you to post more now if you can please. Hi there! I don't really like posting or having big discussions at night, but it seems like the rest of town doesn't feel the same way. Well, this gets my one-post-per-cycle requirement out of the way, at least. See you in a few hours!
are you serious
|
NT also just skirting by night requirements.
Well since scum is down to 3, they probably have played out night 1 more conservatively (subconscious or not). Now that I pointed this out, they might start picking up but I doubt they can hold that charade for 6(?) mislynches through.
Eiii, provide your reasoning why posting / discussion is bad at night.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Sup l10f.
On May 03 2012 09:06 l10f wrote:Hey guys, I'm town this game ^____________^ Show nested quote +On May 03 2012 08:39 Katina wrote:
Mr. Blazinghand I say this once and once only. I'm not mafia. Point your Blazinghand at someone who actually deserves it. Who do you think actually deserves it then? Not many people have posted yet, not too many people to blame. You've just stood out among the few~ Doesn't mean you're mafia, every discussion helps though!
Let's kinda point some fingers... but not call someone scummy at the same time. Let's discuss things, yay!
On May 05 2012 13:00 l10f wrote:
Sorry guys, it was last day of class and I was very busy!
Grush suspected both Katina and sinani, and DoYouHas had a strong case on Katina as well.
Layabout defending Katina and convinced the town to vote for BM instead. I suspect him of being scum. The remaining two scums are probably also in the BM bandwagon near the middle.
Fluffy apology. Summary summary summary. Fingerpointing followed by some nice unprovable speculation about the BM lynch.
Anything concrete to say?
|
On May 06 2012 03:33 slOosh wrote:
Eiii, provide your reasoning why posting / discussion is bad at night.
Discussion about players at night is what I don't like. It feels like it's a time where the ball is in scum's court, and giving them more information with which to decide who's best to kill from town. I'd rather we be the ones to choose who dies after a day of discussion instead of letting scum have that chance. Not to mention it can be helpful for blue hunting-- if someone isn't too active during the day and then becomes a good deal more interested in discussing players and trying to root out scum during the night or whatever, then maaaaybe they have a power role of some sort?
I just don't think it's a good idea, so I try to avoid doing it.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On May 06 2012 03:51 Eiii wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2012 03:33 slOosh wrote:
Eiii, provide your reasoning why posting / discussion is bad at night. Discussion about players at night is what I don't like. It feels like it's a time where the ball is in scum's court, and giving them more information with which to decide who's best to kill from town. I'd rather we be the ones to choose who dies after a day of discussion instead of letting scum have that chance. Not to mention it can be helpful for blue hunting-- if someone isn't too active during the day and then becomes a good deal more interested in discussing players and trying to root out scum during the night or whatever, then maaaaybe they have a power role of some sort? I just don't think it's a good idea, so I try to avoid doing it.
So effectively you're happy with spending 1/3 time we have not hunting scum?
|
You prefer to sit back and twiddle our thumbs for 24 hours Eiii?
Discussion at night also helps blue roles with picking targets. It also doesn't waste time
:3
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
