TL Mafia LIV - Page 2

On May 04 2012 05:05 Katina wrote:
BM has been not been his usual posting self lately. He likes to lurk when he is Mafia. He made a few brief posts early on then disappeared into La La land. So that is something to keep an eye on.

On May 07 2012 03:00 layabout wrote:
Who is more likely to know if one of the mafia team is about to be modkilled?
Members of the mafia team who can communicate privately and should know if their team mate is there (no)
Members of town who can only see the thread and will have no idea who is watching the thread (yes)

On May 07 2012 04:23 Eiii wrote:
So anyway, I'm going to vote for layabout. All the other accusations are good, but one thing most people are missing is that if we had lynched BM and the modkills hadn't happened, we'd be completely lost right now. Lynching a lurker who had done almost literally nothing because he 'might hurt town' gives us zero information. We'd all still be running around in the chaos of day one on day two if kat/206 hadn't fucked up. Between that and the kat defense, I'm throwing my vote on him. If lay flips red then marvel is worth looking at just because of being so associated with both layabout and kat day one.

On May 07 2012 05:15 marvellosity wrote:


Good god. Are you calling layabout scum or not? And if so, why?

Useless post of connections without even making a stance on layabout's alignment, yukyukyukyukyuk.

On May 05 2012 05:43 layabout wrote:
Katina few posts have been critical of the disruptive play at the beginning, and acted to stamp out the bad.


Katina Implies that the "blub scumslip affair" is stupid (it was) by implying that the accusations are rather hastily made (which further implies that they are poorly thought out)


katina points out that BH is being a big drama queen.


Katina points out that the game is hours old and that there has not been time to contribute in response to BH's vote on her for not contributing.


Criticises grush for sheeping a baseless vote.

Points out how destructive the "lets all vote for no real reason" is and tells the perpetrators to stop.

If Katrina does anything suspicious it is the way in which she puts attention on BM. She tells us that he tend to lurk when he is mafia that he posted earlier and is now lurking. He isn't lurking at the moment. Lurking is playing passively, posting infrequently or posting with consistently low content. BM is inactive in this game since these are his only posts:

+ Show Spoiler +
Both of which of from the very beginning of the game

On May 09 2012 06:04 Blazinghand wrote:
This is good news! We didn't lose any power roles, and there are only 2 mafia remaining. I'm thinking Layabout and N_T for the remaining 2 scum. Sorry for being wrong about you Ghost_403.

##vote: Nova_Terra

Let's get it right this time guys

On May 09 2012 07:05 Blazinghand wrote:


Ah, that's interesting, May 9th Nova_Terra! However, I have another player here who disagrees with you.

His name is May 7th Nova_Terra! You should argue with him:

On May 09 2012 10:18 Mementoss wrote:
Also playing with and looking into Nova_Terra saying "I think he is just a bad townie" does not suffice to me. As I said before his reads may not always be right as town but he actively tries to promote discussion and makes a good effort to make cases. There is only one situation I can think of that would make Nova not scum but I'm not going to go into it because its not solid and more of a gut feeling.

On May 10 2012 04:17 Nova_Terra wrote:
Just got back from yet another apple store, looks like im gonna have to take an hour train ride to get to a place where teh iphone can be repaired for around 150$
isnt it wonderful

So anyway, as I promised i will be making an effort to do some analysis, i decided to do a bit of filter analysis on papapanda
Please read his filter along with this case

papapandas filter is surprisingly short. I didnt realize this until i actually went through his filter. Less than 2 pages.
Papapanda starts off the game decently, actually. He seems to post some minor analysis on behavior at the beginning of the game in regards to blubb and grush.

On May 10 2012 04:56 Nova_Terra wrote:

cant tell if forgotten or actually made it out of the scumreads

On May 10 2012 04:17 Nova_Terra wrote:

However, at the same time, i noticed a bit of noncommittal behavior on his thoughts on blubb. "i thought he probably misread, but im still somewhat suspicious" just say you have a neutral read if you're neutral on him. Then he kinda tries to make a very early bandwagon target. I dont like that.

On May 10 2012 04:17 Nova_Terra wrote:
Then theres a bunch of 1 liners, with a question that makes it seem like he is contributing. he likes to continually state that he will lynch/unvote blubb, while at the same time saying nothing else about anyone. another thing to note is he puts a "placeholder vote" on blubb in case he cant make the deadline, effectively setting himself up to not be there and not post if he doesnt have to.
Then he jumps on the GRUSH BE HELPFUL NOT THIS SHIT "contribution" bandwagon.

On May 10 2012 04:17 Nova_Terra wrote:
Now here comes the parts that i think are pretty scummy.


This post goes like this

SOFT DEFENSE SOFT DEFENSE AGREEMENT AGREEMENT SOFT DEFENSE

and fluff. then he says he is totally undecided. come on, really? you can make a post spamming agreement and soft defense, but you cant make a solid read?

On May 05 2012 06:00 Nova_Terra wrote:
In accordance with popular demand, i will share my top scumread which is currently Mementoss (not based on OMGUS)

mementoss starts off suggesting to policy lynch two people, etc. Makes a few totally unneccessary 1 liners, and then when he is called out on it he goes NO WAIT i has reason, then decided to teach us, which just came off freaking weird.
Then he goes aggressive on layabout, throwing suspicion while not doing much of anything, then joins the Grush did something scummy this looks really bad group. not original. then after blazing notes something on me he joins in that too, and makes remarks in an unsure way, seeming to want to be able to backtrack if necessary. then, when called out on it, he goes into defensive aggression mode and suddenly gains massive confidence which hadnt been in his play before.
Overall
1liners
Enlightens us on 1 liners
throws suspicion while not doing much at all
joins scummy bandwagon
seems unsure
agrees with an Oh i noticed the same thing!
makes arguments based on my meta, which is questionable entirely based on the fact that i never play this lurky, town or scum
randomly gets massively confident, as opposed to his earlier play, its as if someone told him to be more sure

and so ##Vote: Mementoss

On May 10 2012 04:17 Nova_Terra wrote:
Next comes a puny case of marvellosity after saying a conspiracy theory about how BM's lynching was orchestrated by scum, which seems mighty convenient coming from someone who soft defended BM and didnt take part in his lynch

Then he reposts an idea from layabout and says its "interesting", then agrees again with someone else and sets up a cute little train "marv next after layabout" setting up for future lynch.
Goes on to criticize defense again and agains, and now he goes back to a neutral read on blubb. and says that the only reason to think blubb was scum was becuase of his slip day 1 (wait, didnt he say that he thought this wasnt scummy and he could have easily done the same thing?)
And some more 1 liners.
Later,
"i can see why you want to lynch N_T but like N_T said"
MORE AGREEMENT, MORE AGREEMENT, NOOOOOOOOOOOOO
PUSH SOMETHING OTHER THEN LAYABOUT/MARV MOOOOOOORE
Then he seems like hes making a misunderstanding about mementoss on purpose

allaround,
Agrees a shitton, 1 liners a ton, and tunnels a good bit, soft defends so he can use it later
so right now i feel comfortable putting a vote on him
##Vote: papapanda