TL Mafia 'Area' LIII - Page 55
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
| ||
Ottoxlol
735 Posts
On April 24 2012 23:29 ghost_403 wrote: StDaniel is en route to being modkilled. If he comes back and does nothing, I will discuss him as a possible lynch candidate. Since he's not even playing, there's no point in pushing for his lynch. @marv: Ottoxlol's posting history shows him posting outside the TLMafia subforum, so I'm leaning newbie on him. However, some of the stuff that I've seen him do in thread has made me think he's "newbie scum" as opposed to "newbie town". BJ's (lol) case addresses some of that. I really need to work on reading newbie towns, so that is something I think I would like to work on. Can you quote what of BJ's stuff made sense to you? I addressed all of it I think, but if something is still not clear i would like to explain. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 24 2012 23:31 ghost_403 wrote: Also, I'm in tears because now, even if Marv does flips town, I might not get to see blzinghand eat his hat T_T I don't believe his statement included 'unless I get mod-killed or die'. So, we will still get us some hat-eating. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Scum-reads - Zeph, Ottox (will probably post more about this later today or tomorrow) Also, Risen has not improved in a way that allows me to use meta anymore to defend him. He did adamantly try and protect he best townie (and a blue) from lynch however. I can't see a reason for scum doing this, but then again that might be EXACTLY why he did it. idk, but he is probably the scummiest after the other 6. | ||
Ottoxlol
735 Posts
On April 25 2012 00:27 Mattchew wrote: Lurkers: Janaan, St Daniel, Broodking Exe, Bill Murray, Sentinel Scum-reads - Zeph, Ottox (will probably post more about this later today or tomorrow) Also, Risen has not improved in a way that allows me to use meta anymore to defend him. He did adamantly try and protect he best townie (and a blue) from lynch however. I can't see a reason for scum doing this, but then again that might be EXACTLY why he did it. idk, but he is probably the scummiest after the other 6. On April 24 2012 22:21 Ottoxlol wrote: I believe that there is at least one scum on that list, I read them all. I couldn't come up with a case that's strong. Bm contributed zero, it is really hard to analyse someone with zero posts. Marvellosity been attacked d1 with a very weak case, I did not find anything suspicious there layabout he was on my d1 list because I felt his opinion switches were a bit suspicious but d2 he's been posting some very good things, i think he's town Sentinel wasn't too involved in the debates, the case against him is semi decent, but if we punish someone because he did not got involved it should be the one with the least contribution Zephridd's defense is that he was afk too. We have 3 players who did some afking Sent BM Zeph from the VE crowd, Sentinel and Zeph tried contributing so I would vote rather BM then those other 2. He's getting votes and called out why don't he post and he's still just lurking around. BM please get into the game and show us you are town, or else I feel you'll get lynched. How's the first post any better then the second? | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On April 25 2012 00:42 Ottoxlol wrote: How's the first post any better then the second? Its not, I am not basing my read on you on your reads or 1 post in particular, I am basing it off of how you have posted. | ||
Ottoxlol
735 Posts
I am thinking on the line of who should we lynch that gives us info. VE wagon seemed like a good start to look at, I made 3 pairs who seems to defend each other/attack the same persons. If we lynch anyone from that we can get information about the other half of the pair. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 25 2012 00:57 Ottoxlol wrote: Ok, post it when you got it drawn. I feel like the pressure is on me because I did not make any useful post d2, and i feel its really unfair when no one really did so. I am thinking on the line of who should we lynch that gives us info. VE wagon seemed like a good start to look at, I made 3 pairs who seems to defend each other/attack the same persons. If we lynch anyone from that we can get information about the other half of the pair. Because we're looking for you to actually have/push a scumread at this point, rather than wishy-washy connections that may or may not mean something and aren't even accurate, e.g. laya attacking marv, defending zeph I don't see layabout attacking me at any point, in fact he was one of the most vocal critics of BJ for his case on me. layabout just wasn't sure of my case on Zephirdd. | ||
Ottoxlol
735 Posts
On April 22 2012 00:21 layabout wrote: ##Vote marvellosity get posting or die check out the + Show Spoiler [case] + On April 22 2012 02:44 layabout wrote: I think marvel looks bad because he was around in the first couple of hours of the game, he was willing to make comments in the thread but he was unwilling to share an opinion. Every player should have an opinion about what is best, and the only players who would fear to share them are mafia, since telling and possibly helping town to do what you think is best for town is not in your best interests. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
That was 3 days ago. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
But with regards to any recent posting, your line doesn't make much sense. | ||
Ottoxlol
735 Posts
| ||
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 25 2012 01:31 Ottoxlol wrote: What? So we shouldn't look at what happened 3 days ago? What happened 3 days ago: layabout called me out for one-liners What happened since: I made more constructive posts and layabout heavily attacked BJ for maintaining his case. Which do you think is more relevant to the current state of affairs? I mean, feel free to try to read into layabout attacking me near the beginning of the game, I just don't understand what you're constructively hoping to achieve when events since superceded those. | ||
Ottoxlol
735 Posts
On April 25 2012 00:57 Ottoxlol wrote: I am thinking on the line of who should we lynch that gives us info. VE wagon seemed like a good start to look at, I made 3 pairs who seems to defend each other/attack the same persons. If we lynch anyone from that we can get information about the other half of the pair. This. Anyone have a better plan? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
So who? | ||
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
Well this is a scum tell if I ever heard one. We lynch who we think is scum. If they are scum, that automatically gives us information. We don't lynch for information. You could easily be scum saying, if we lynch this guy it gives us information on this guy. Wasting 2 days of lynch into townies. | ||
Ottoxlol
735 Posts
On April 24 2012 22:21 Ottoxlol wrote: I believe that there is at least one scum on that list, I read them all. I couldn't come up with a case that's strong. Bm contributed zero, it is really hard to analyse someone with zero posts. Marvellosity been attacked d1 with a very weak case, I did not find anything suspicious there layabout he was on my d1 list because I felt his opinion switches were a bit suspicious but d2 he's been posting some very good things, i think he's town Sentinel wasn't too involved in the debates, the case against him is semi decent, but if we punish someone because he did not got involved it should be the one with the least contribution Zephridd's defense is that he was afk too. We have 3 players who did some afking Sent BM Zeph from the VE crowd, Sentinel and Zeph tried contributing so I would vote rather BM then those other 2. He's getting votes and called out why don't he post and he's still just lurking around. BM please get into the game and show us you are town, or else I feel you'll get lynched. Still BM. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 25 2012 01:43 Mementoss wrote: Well this is a scum tell if I ever heard one. We lynch who we think is scum. If they are scum, that automatically gives us information. We don't lynch for information. You could easily be scum saying, if we lynch this guy it gives us information on this guy. Wasting 2 days of lynch into townies. Agreed, but at this point I just want him to tell us who he thinks we should lynch and what the case on him is. Terrible connection-wifom cases aside | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Ok, so your stance is we should lynch BM because ... he's been lurking? Do you have anything to say about the Zephirdd/Sentinel cases? | ||
| ||