EPT/syllogism
A Game of Thrones Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
/syllogism | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
I'll take advantage of this post to inform you that I don't know shit about GoT and I'll strike down with great anger people that are using too much useless flavor in their posts. | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 22 2012 01:20 GreYMisT wrote: Guys I say we lynch Wherebugsgo, just to be certain. Sand/Syllo can you guys sign you posts? It makes it a lot easier for the rest of us to keep track of who thinks what. Xatalos, I'm interested on what you think about Wherebugsgo/littlefinger. How do you think we should go about interacting with him now that we know he is 3rd party? Also i would like to assure everyone that even though I am hosting Aperture Mafia, the science will not keep me from being active here. What part of MODCONFIRMED UNLYNCHABLE/UNKILLABLE do you not understand? Next person that discusses wbg or engages in any useless conversation with him get's my vote. Consider it like he is not even playing in this game. /sandroba | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
Let's kill Oberyn gogogo. | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 22 2012 11:29 OriginalName wrote: Arco prob town but why do you think gumshoes is, in all honesty im still 50/50 on him. Oberyn needs some more before i make a call too. Gumshoe makes 3 retarded posts in a row, all of which seem genuine and if he was scum I'm pretty sure someone would have filled him in/raged at him, because that ought to rise suspicion from the jubjubs that think not having a clue=scum. Him and acro are the easy day 1 lynch bait that scum love to cast suspicion on. | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 22 2012 04:56 layabout wrote: zealos do you intend to keep spamming up the thread? Do you intend to keep not posting? Any thoughts on Oberyn yet? Risen you've yet to express a single opinion that in any way relates to the game Chaoser I don't like this point you brought up gumshoe's response to Acro's situation was also weird and problematic. His first suggestion to Acro was to role claim. Now, had that been towards a more experienced player I would have less problems with but since it's to a newbie, there was a decently high chance acro might have actually claimed (as can be seen in the recent games where there have been day one role claims). Newbieness? The rest of his posts seem to suggest so but I will be keeping tabs on him as the game goes on. Does the highlighted section in any way have relate to his alignment? Weird and problematic? This reads like something a person who has to force cases would say. Moreover, do you think it's more likely for new scum or new town to make such a ridiculous role claim inquiry? You've posted some content, but it's a bit light in terms of actual accusations; even when you assert mattchew is fake tunnelling, you don't vote for him nor do you call him scum. You say people should be aware of how much we are posting and that you will be "keeping tabs on" gumshoe. Would you be up to lynching Oberyn today? /syllogism | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
Or we could go for a random lurker from evantrees/lyter/risen. But I have a better idea, let's lynch layabout for not giving a fuck and popping in to support my case on oberyn and sprouting a lot of bullshit in all of his posts. Filter laya and check it out. Maybe syllo will be kind enough to pop in and make a decent case. Meanwhile you can all trust me and just get laya lynched. ##Unvote ##vote layabout | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 23 2012 00:50 Risen wrote: Class for another hour and a half, time for some reading when I get back. (Just an update for those who may think I'm lurking since I haven't posted as much as I should have) So how was the class? Any further updates? What do the people voting for Oberyn think about that post he just made? | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
@risen it's on the first page by curu /sandroba | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 23 2012 05:37 wherebugsgo wrote: sandro I don't think layabout is a good target. His posting tone is distinctly different from his tone from Storm. Why don't we discuss things, sandro? I've already explained to you that my best interest lies in lynching mafia. So why don't we collaborate? The op says you can't explain what your best interest in, nor you need to, since nothing can touch you. However I'll give you that syllo agrees with you on laya. | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 23 2012 10:39 OriginalName wrote: I'm voting SLJ For the following reasons I believe them to be scum. -There's two of them and they are both lurking hardcore there is no excuse for this behaviour -Not contributing any opinions before flaunting vet status and starting questionable bandwagon that everyone is jumping on. -Pushing agenda through above method -Doing nothing to contribute to atmosphere and using horrid paragraph/other crappie that neither usually ignore and makes it seem that they really don't care -Throwing votes down without reason The cases on layabout are fairly meh nothing of his outright rises suspicion other then his questionable alt targets. Alderan is increadably trashy as well with that clear bandwagon jump how do people get away with this. #Vote SLJ I only joined the game because I was asked to because Sandroba says he can't play otherwise; I didn't have much interetest in playing and I do not intend to post unless I have to. Please direct me to a post where I've "flaunted vet status" and started "questionable bandwagon" and "pushed agenda" (whatever that means). Actually the whole post is nonsense or directed at sandroba. Why are alderan and layabout "incredibly trashy" wagons and what do you mean people get away with it? /syllogism | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 23 2012 20:13 Acrofales wrote: SLJ: if most of the things said are town reads, then who do you currently suspect of being mafia? Sandro's last idea was Layabout, and you were supposed to post the case. Yet, you came in and said he was town (although you didn't unvote him). So who is mafia? Imho your behaviour is increasingly suspect. As a potential leader for town, you're doing a subpar job. So is greymist, btw. I wasn't supposed to post anything and did not come in and say he was town. I only told sandroba that wbg has a point about layabout's tone not being what I expect from his mafia play, but he hasn't posted enough to go further than that. Out of the players we are more comfortable reading, we do not currently like chaoser and greymist. I scum hunt primarily by process of elimination, so a lot of my focus is on "confirming" townies. There is absolutely nothing "suspect" about our behaviour, so while you have a point about us not putting in much effort yet, and I won't promise I will, you should focus your attention elsewhere. | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 23 2012 20:35 Acrofales wrote: Anyway, I kinda agree that you haven't done anything that makes you seem particularly scummy. I just don't like your inactivity. I see why you think Greymist is scummy, but I was getting town vibes for Chaoser. Why do you think he's mafia? I posted a bit about him earlier; it looked like he was forcing cases. Further, I don't like his response to my suspicion either as it looked a bit too defensive and I would expect town chaoser to be more hostile towards us due to our relative inactivity. Also, I still find his "This is like the shittiest fake tunneling ever lol" comment on mattchew suspicious as that specifically implies he thinks that mattchew was fake tunnelling and thus scum, but didn't really push him much. It's possible that I'm reading too much into that and it was just an offhand remark. | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 23 2012 20:34 Mattchew wrote: Hey SLJ can you tell me what you think of me and this bandwagon on me? I had a preliminary town read on you based on quite silly reasoning, but I'm not quite as sure anymore. I do think your play doesn't look like your scum play in werewolves II at least. Have you been scum in any other game? | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 24 2012 05:44 Risen wrote: I'm in a state of shock that with acro's horrible play he isn't the number one target right now... Please, be so kind to point out to me what in acro's play that makes him scum. | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 24 2012 06:05 Sinensis wrote: Well he is posting lists that aren't true, questions that are answered in the rules of the game, he's insulting people in the thread because they don't agree with him, and spamming other irrelevant stuff in the last few hours of the first day... All those things are at least more scummy to me than what others are doing right now. Seems to be par for the course for him this game though. The only one out of those that could point towards him being mafia is answering irrelevant questions (I don't know what the questions were like), the others point more towards him being town or are null indicators. He has certainly posted more substance than you. /syllogism | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 24 2012 06:32 Risen wrote: I'm fine with Sinesis right now. Just above you he makes a pretty bold post challenging the two man team, not sure how else he could barge into the forefront. I'm leaning more and more towards a mafia SLJ. He's casting doubt on perfectly reasonable assumptions. Please directly quote the "perfectly reasonable" assumptions that we have been "casting doubt on" and then explain how that makes someone mafia, unless you are insinuating it's mafia defending mafia. The above Sinensis quote? How is insulting someone or spamming scummy? How is answering questions scummy? In the case of latter it's only scummy if a person is answering irrelevant questions in an attempt to look like he is contributin. Even if you remove that content from his filter, you are still left with actual contributions that do not look scummy. Certainly more so than the majority of the players in the game. | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
Greymist: he has posted more since then. Have they not made you re-evaluate your opinion at all? /syllogism | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 24 2012 07:02 GreYMisT wrote: Do you think sheer post count is enough to absolve people? And risen, thats an interesting opinion, do you think im scum? I'm referring to the content of those posts, are you serious | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 24 2012 07:13 GreYMisT wrote: Are we serious? The town has collectively switched lynch targets 3 times in the past 24 hours. Make up your own minds for God's sake. This is one of the most frustrating day 1's I have seen in quite some time. How is that frustrating and has town really "collectively switched lynch targets 3 times"? Your frustration doesn't feel genuine to me | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 25 2012 05:20 Acrofales wrote: Please, someone vig hit SLJ tonight. He is doing way more harm than good atm. Everything we've said makes sense. Neither of us is very motivated right now, but I'm growing tired of your asinine assertions /syllogism | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
/syllogism | ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
| ||
|
SamuelLJackson
223 Posts
On March 25 2012 09:09 evantrees wrote: sigh, sorry you felt the need to do that failing again. Perhaps you should stop signing up for games if you have no interest in playing them then. | ||
| ||
