• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:56
CEST 09:56
KST 16:56
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3
Community News
Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)8Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over2New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!40Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week6Weekly Cups (August 10-16): SHIN doubles3
StarCraft 2
General
Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game SC4ALL II: SC2 Player Announcement 6/8 - Maru Weekly Cups (August 10-16): SHIN doubles Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2?
Tourneys
Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) 2026 GSTL Announcement PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This Mutation # 539 Thunder Dome
Brood War
General
New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! Which box art did your first copy of StarCraft 1 have? ASL22 General Discussion [Personal Project Share] Terran Defense v0.60 BW General Discussion
Tourneys
BSL LAN Party - Kraków 29-30 August - OPEN SIGNUPS [ASL22] Ro24 Group F [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Game Theory for Starcraft Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Stratus: Battle for the sky now on steam Early acc General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Anyone here play Quakeworld back in the day?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Regacy Esports: The Bh…
regacyesports
Violent Games and Crime Rate…
TrAiDoS
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 4358 users

A Game of Thrones Mafia - Page 20

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 18 19 20 21 22 73 Next
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
March 22 2012 22:05 GMT
#381
Hey Risen, once again you (like so many others) post vague things about people as if they have meaning. When you say something like "what he has posted is quality in my opinion" why don't you actually point out what is quality and why instead of just calling it quality.

btw i doubt that i am focusing on one guy when I never voted him, have made a case on someone else, and actually voted for a third person
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Zealos
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United Kingdom3576 Posts
March 22 2012 22:14 GMT
#382
The point he was making, Mattchew, is that you focus all your attention on one guy WITHOUT posting for him, which in his eye's is fishy. I am now off to bed though, so I'll answer and questions/make a fresh analysis in the morning. Nn.
On the internet if you disagree with or dislike something you're angry and taking it too seriously. == Join TLMafia !
gumshoe
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Canada3602 Posts
March 22 2012 22:40 GMT
#383
Hey guys, sorry i haven't checked in yet been busy with school(finals next week) anyways in regard to the blue thing, I did it because in my last game jackal was about to be lynched when he revealed the name of his character, thats what ended up setting us back on track. So I thought a similar thing could help Acro, I was also looking to see if he'd name the role and not the character, which would be a dead giveaway. It was a dumb plan, and I'm sorry but I still think acro is scum, what I especialy liked was how he pretty much assumed I was scum for accusing him and flipped out, I think he was trying to deflect the susiciun on him onto me, but hounestley its my own fault for letting him. If anyone has any more specific questions for me I should be reachable now

Moving on the person I'm the most suspicious of is Alderaan. First off he suggested town back off me and acro until we responded, even though the odds of that were minimal considering that we were the two best cases at the time as was, the reasoning against us were not at all bad, there was no harm in pressuring us.

Yet Alderaan suggests we back off but doesn't suggest a new topic, just says wait, well I was busy and if town had decided to wait until I was back to discuss my lynch we would have wasted a day, Aldaraan just shut down discussion, only later does he introduce his suspicion of Mattchew, but at the time he just told us to chill out. I'm still pretty certain that Acro is scum, but even if he is there really is very little risk involved in the way Alderaan defended Acro, because he defended me as well which means he comes off looking like a great mediator instead of someone protecting other scum.

Alderaan did a similar thing in surprisingly normal mini mafia 7, everyone was sure that I was scum yet Aleraan gave me the benefit of the doubt, but not before discrediting me as just a silly player and encouraging me to post more(despite the fact that I was a harmful party at the time).

I also don't like how he is trying to crumb suspicion on Grey mist, while I don't see eye to eye to him I do see that he is trying to be aggressive and put information out there and sure enough we've turned on him for it , (though I would like to see a bit more analysis in his posts in the future but there really isn't too much to go on day one) scum always bombard the best players, not even to see them lynched just to make them look questionable and thats exactly what Alderaan's doing right now, he hasn't even been willing to admit his reasons for suspecting Grey mist yet, he just put them out there, why mention them in the first place?

Hes playing a much more passive game than the last one I played with him, where he was eager to contribute, he's only taking safe bets, not sticking his neck out too far lest it be cut. A similar thing was how he attacked Mattchew for pretty much just doing early pressure and then pulled his suspicion back.

Next up I dont like how dispraortinate lay abouts posts are, what I mean by that is his reasons for accusing people really dont deserve the insta lynch verdict eh so whimsicaly doles out.

His first post says the players who called out wherebugso are scum, first off why just these two? Several people discussed it early on, are all of them scum? Your conviction seems to say so, but you drop it at the first sign of a more likely lynch.

You attack Oberyn for low content posts when you yourself and several other players have pretty much no content, then you say hes scummy because he uses qoutes, which is scummy how? Qoutes are evidence, I wish I wasn't so lazy so I would use them more, oh and hes scummy cause he asks questions, how is asking questions/light pressure not making stuff happen? Oh and the contradiction is pretty weak. You strike me as extremely reckless as a townie, especially because you don't address the rebuttals to your claims(which means you see your fairly baseless accusations as an ends within themselves, not a means to generate discussion)

All in all Oberon dosent look too scummy to me(though lists including null reads are never pretty) he needs to post more.

Oberon what do you think of Layabout?

All in all I'm leaning Layabout because we dont lose much if he dies, and if I'm wrong about Alderaan(despite the eerie similaities between this game and his first game as scum) well lost a strong townie. I'd be willing to lynch Acro for sure though, guy still hasn't contributed much at all.

FOS:Alderaan

FOS: Acro

Vote: Layabout







Any buddy got any questions?
gumshoe bullshitting at 120%~~Prplz
Oberyn
Profile Joined December 2011
United Kingdom508 Posts
March 22 2012 22:52 GMT
#384
On March 23 2012 07:40 gumshoe wrote:
Oberon what do you think of Layabout?


I think there are better lynches today, such as GreYMisT or Alderan. If Layabout never shows up today to contribute a lynch target, then I'm willing to lynch him.
Oberyn was ever the viper. Deadly, dangerous, unpredictable. No man dared tread on him.
Alderan
Profile Joined September 2010
United States463 Posts
March 22 2012 23:05 GMT
#385
+ Show Spoiler +
Moving on the person I'm the most suspicious of is Alderaan. First off he suggested town back off me and acro until we responded, even though the odds of that were minimal considering that we were the two best cases at the time as was, the reasoning against us were not at all bad, there was no harm in pressuring us.


Gum, I have spent the last 2 games I've played with a town that was dominated by a mistake you made early in the game that made you scummy. I wasn't stifling discussion, I just did not want the town environment be such that people could just come in, say the found acro and gumshoe suspicious and be on their merry way (which the thread had degenerated into).

+ Show Spoiler +

Yet Alderaan suggests we back off but doesn't suggest a new topic, just says wait, well I was busy and if town had decided to wait until I was back to discuss my lynch we would have wasted a day, Aldaraan just shut down discussion, only later does he introduce his suspicion of Mattchew, but at the time he just told us to chill out. I'm still pretty certain that Acro is scum, but even if he is there really is very little risk involved in the way Alderaan defended Acro, because he defended me as well which means he comes off looking like a great mediator instead of someone protecting other scum


I didn't suggest taking the pressure off you, I just wanted people to allow a response before they made up their mind. Talk about wasting time, imagine if everyone had gone along with the "either gumshoe or acro" lynch possibilities and then you flipped green, not only are we wasting a day, we are wasting a lynch.

As for the rest of your post, I think you're trying to meta me entirely too hard. I'm playing more passively, maybe, but there hasn't been a whole lot to discuss yet. Not a lot of information to go off.


Alderan
Profile Joined September 2010
United States463 Posts
March 22 2012 23:08 GMT
#386
EBWOP
"Dominated" above is in reference to the town's discussion was dominated by an early mistake.
Alderan
Profile Joined September 2010
United States463 Posts
March 22 2012 23:13 GMT
#387
As for Greymist, I was waiting to say anything because I wanted to read your response post to ensure that I was not wrong on my initial read, and I don't believe I was.

That said, I think Greymist is too experienced a player to actually believe a scum would make the mistakes gumshoe made early on. Any semi competent scum team would have identified gumshoe's posting as weak after asking about the mayor, and coached him through his next few posts.

Instead Greymist suggested that the scum stood idly by and watched Greymist go blue fishing the very first day.....

Right.....

layabout
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United Kingdom2600 Posts
March 22 2012 23:18 GMT
#388
If you are gonna be like that then i will read the damn thread!

On March 23 2012 06:10 Risen wrote:
-snip-
Show nested quote +
On March 22 2012 01:57 Oberyn wrote:
On March 22 2012 01:35 SamuelLJackson wrote:
On March 22 2012 01:20 GreYMisT wrote:
Guys I say we lynch Wherebugsgo, just to be certain.

Sand/Syllo can you guys sign you posts? It makes it a lot easier for the rest of us to keep track of who thinks what.

Xatalos, I'm interested on what you think about Wherebugsgo/littlefinger. How do you think we should go about interacting with him now that we know he is 3rd party?

Also i would like to assure everyone that even though I am hosting Aperture Mafia, the science will not keep me from being active here.

What part of MODCONFIRMED UNLYNCHABLE/UNKILLABLE do you not understand? Next person that discusses wbg or engages in any useless conversation with him get's my vote. Consider it like he is not even playing in this game.
/sandroba


I definitely agree with this. We shouldn't allow players to pretend to contribute by speculating on a role that has little impact on the events of the first few days. If wherebugsgo wants to coordinate with town to somehow mutually achieve our goals, then that's fine, but otherwise it is best to ignore him.

On March 22 2012 01:50 gumshoe wrote:
moving on lets discuss policy(it'll only take a bit and we may as well get it over with early on) do we set a preliminary lynch deadline?(im leaning 8 hours in advance if we do) Do we policy lynch hardcore lurkers?(by hardcore I mean like 3 one liners a cycle, personally for this because lynching lurkers always helps clear the air a bit and they werent helping anyway so nothing really lost) are we going to elect a mayor?( I've never done this before so I dont know how that works)


If you want to discuss policy, then why are you just giving a bunch of questions? You should share what your actual opinion is. A no-lynch should be out of the question as this person suggests:

On March 21 2012 23:39 Xatalos wrote:
Ah, damn it... No editing! However, I just thought that since you HAVE to vote every day, it might not be such a bad idea to throw random votes early. In my previous Mafia games it was common not to lynch anyone on the first day, and wait for clues on the second day. When people random lynched on the first day, it usually just meant an easier win for the Mafia.


We don't accomplish anything and obtain no information if everyone gets a free pass on day one. Lurkers should be pressured to post, but the day one lynch shouldn't only be focused on people without posts since it is also tough to generate information.

On March 21 2012 23:06 Xatalos wrote:
(At least we now get to see some interesting reactions, I hope! Acrofales had a quite interesting reaction, too, although it doesn't necessarily mean Mafia yet... Some people haven't said anything at all yet, and I can't wait to see what they say. At this rate there will be a huge amount of data to base lynch votes on )


This is a sketchy post. What does "interesting" mean? Is it scummy? You should draw conclusions rather than tell us that you look forward to reading peoples posts.


Solid analysis.

GIANT POST WITH LOTS OF OPINIONS.

I don't see how his posting could be construed as anti-town. He hasn't posted much, but what he has posted (for the most part) has been useful. Most definitely not a lynch candidate in my opinion. You can say he's being too neutral, but it's day 1 and there's not much to work with. We shouldn't lynch someone who is making an effort at quality posts.

Risen you totally missed the point, he was making very careful posts that have effort into them but little content. That was what was scummy, because it shows that he clearly cares about the game but not that he cares about town's sucess.

Gumshoe,
On March 23 2012 07:40 gumshoe wrote:
Next up I dont like how dispraortinate lay abouts posts are, what I mean by that is his reasons for accusing people really dont deserve the insta lynch verdict eh so whimsicaly doles out.

His first post says the players who called out wherebugso are scum, first off why just these two? Several people discussed it early on, are all of them scum? Your conviction seems to say so, but you drop it at the first sign of a more likely lynch.

You attack Oberyn for low content posts when you yourself and several other players have pretty much no content, then you say hes scummy because he uses qoutes, which is scummy how? Qoutes are evidence, I wish I wasn't so lazy so I would use them more, oh and hes scummy cause he asks questions, how is asking questions/light pressure not making stuff happen? Oh and the contradiction is pretty weak. You strike me as extremely reckless as a townie, especially because you don't address the rebuttals to your claims(which means you see your fairly baseless accusations as an ends within themselves, not a means to generate discussion)

All in all Oberon dosent look too scummy to me(though lists including null reads are never pretty) he needs to post more.

Oberon what do you think of Layabout?

All in all I'm leaning Layabout because we dont lose much if he dies, and if I'm wrong about Alderaan(despite the eerie similaities between this game and his first game as scum) well lost a strong townie. I'd be willing to lynch Acro for sure though, guy still hasn't contributed much at all.

FOS:Alderaan

FOS: Acro

Vote: Layabout

Why are you voting for a "reckless townie"?
Be the Best You Can Be ! Play MAFIA II http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/ II Dragonsound Best Band
gumshoe
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Canada3602 Posts
March 22 2012 23:20 GMT
#389
On March 23 2012 08:18 layabout wrote:
If you are gonna be like that then i will read the damn thread!

Show nested quote +
On March 23 2012 06:10 Risen wrote:
-snip-
On March 22 2012 01:57 Oberyn wrote:
On March 22 2012 01:35 SamuelLJackson wrote:
On March 22 2012 01:20 GreYMisT wrote:
Guys I say we lynch Wherebugsgo, just to be certain.

Sand/Syllo can you guys sign you posts? It makes it a lot easier for the rest of us to keep track of who thinks what.

Xatalos, I'm interested on what you think about Wherebugsgo/littlefinger. How do you think we should go about interacting with him now that we know he is 3rd party?

Also i would like to assure everyone that even though I am hosting Aperture Mafia, the science will not keep me from being active here.

What part of MODCONFIRMED UNLYNCHABLE/UNKILLABLE do you not understand? Next person that discusses wbg or engages in any useless conversation with him get's my vote. Consider it like he is not even playing in this game.
/sandroba


I definitely agree with this. We shouldn't allow players to pretend to contribute by speculating on a role that has little impact on the events of the first few days. If wherebugsgo wants to coordinate with town to somehow mutually achieve our goals, then that's fine, but otherwise it is best to ignore him.

On March 22 2012 01:50 gumshoe wrote:
moving on lets discuss policy(it'll only take a bit and we may as well get it over with early on) do we set a preliminary lynch deadline?(im leaning 8 hours in advance if we do) Do we policy lynch hardcore lurkers?(by hardcore I mean like 3 one liners a cycle, personally for this because lynching lurkers always helps clear the air a bit and they werent helping anyway so nothing really lost) are we going to elect a mayor?( I've never done this before so I dont know how that works)


If you want to discuss policy, then why are you just giving a bunch of questions? You should share what your actual opinion is. A no-lynch should be out of the question as this person suggests:

On March 21 2012 23:39 Xatalos wrote:
Ah, damn it... No editing! However, I just thought that since you HAVE to vote every day, it might not be such a bad idea to throw random votes early. In my previous Mafia games it was common not to lynch anyone on the first day, and wait for clues on the second day. When people random lynched on the first day, it usually just meant an easier win for the Mafia.


We don't accomplish anything and obtain no information if everyone gets a free pass on day one. Lurkers should be pressured to post, but the day one lynch shouldn't only be focused on people without posts since it is also tough to generate information.

On March 21 2012 23:06 Xatalos wrote:
(At least we now get to see some interesting reactions, I hope! Acrofales had a quite interesting reaction, too, although it doesn't necessarily mean Mafia yet... Some people haven't said anything at all yet, and I can't wait to see what they say. At this rate there will be a huge amount of data to base lynch votes on )


This is a sketchy post. What does "interesting" mean? Is it scummy? You should draw conclusions rather than tell us that you look forward to reading peoples posts.


Solid analysis.

GIANT POST WITH LOTS OF OPINIONS.

I don't see how his posting could be construed as anti-town. He hasn't posted much, but what he has posted (for the most part) has been useful. Most definitely not a lynch candidate in my opinion. You can say he's being too neutral, but it's day 1 and there's not much to work with. We shouldn't lynch someone who is making an effort at quality posts.

Risen you totally missed the point, he was making very careful posts that have effort into them but little content. That was what was scummy, because it shows that he clearly cares about the game but not that he cares about town's sucess.

Gumshoe,
Show nested quote +
On March 23 2012 07:40 gumshoe wrote:
Next up I dont like how dispraortinate lay abouts posts are, what I mean by that is his reasons for accusing people really dont deserve the insta lynch verdict eh so whimsicaly doles out.

His first post says the players who called out wherebugso are scum, first off why just these two? Several people discussed it early on, are all of them scum? Your conviction seems to say so, but you drop it at the first sign of a more likely lynch.

You attack Oberyn for low content posts when you yourself and several other players have pretty much no content, then you say hes scummy because he uses qoutes, which is scummy how? Qoutes are evidence, I wish I wasn't so lazy so I would use them more, oh and hes scummy cause he asks questions, how is asking questions/light pressure not making stuff happen? Oh and the contradiction is pretty weak. You strike me as extremely reckless as a townie, especially because you don't address the rebuttals to your claims(which means you see your fairly baseless accusations as an ends within themselves, not a means to generate discussion)

All in all Oberon dosent look too scummy to me(though lists including null reads are never pretty) he needs to post more.

Oberon what do you think of Layabout?

All in all I'm leaning Layabout because we dont lose much if he dies, and if I'm wrong about Alderaan(despite the eerie similaities between this game and his first game as scum) well lost a strong townie. I'd be willing to lynch Acro for sure though, guy still hasn't contributed much at all.

FOS:Alderaan

FOS: Acro

Vote: Layabout

Why are you voting for a "reckless townie"?


Reckless townie/scum.
gumshoe bullshitting at 120%~~Prplz
gumshoe
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Canada3602 Posts
March 22 2012 23:21 GMT
#390
On March 23 2012 08:05 Alderan wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Moving on the person I'm the most suspicious of is Alderaan. First off he suggested town back off me and acro until we responded, even though the odds of that were minimal considering that we were the two best cases at the time as was, the reasoning against us were not at all bad, there was no harm in pressuring us.


Gum, I have spent the last 2 games I've played with a town that was dominated by a mistake you made early in the game that made you scummy. I wasn't stifling discussion, I just did not want the town environment be such that people could just come in, say the found acro and gumshoe suspicious and be on their merry way (which the thread had degenerated into).

+ Show Spoiler +

Yet Alderaan suggests we back off but doesn't suggest a new topic, just says wait, well I was busy and if town had decided to wait until I was back to discuss my lynch we would have wasted a day, Aldaraan just shut down discussion, only later does he introduce his suspicion of Mattchew, but at the time he just told us to chill out. I'm still pretty certain that Acro is scum, but even if he is there really is very little risk involved in the way Alderaan defended Acro, because he defended me as well which means he comes off looking like a great mediator instead of someone protecting other scum


I didn't suggest taking the pressure off you, I just wanted people to allow a response before they made up their mind. Talk about wasting time, imagine if everyone had gone along with the "either gumshoe or acro" lynch possibilities and then you flipped green, not only are we wasting a day, we are wasting a lynch.

As for the rest of your post, I think you're trying to meta me entirely too hard. I'm playing more passively, maybe, but there hasn't been a whole lot to discuss yet. Not a lot of information to go off.




Yes but you reacted in two very different ways both games, the first game you just acknowledged it as if it was there, you didn't really take it seriously, the second game you were actively pressuring me all the way though, this game seems like a return to that passive former form, your posts are more directional as opposed to informative and now that I've posted I would very much like to hear your case on Grey mist.

Now while I am suspicious of your passive play this time around, I recognize that you could just be a townie waiting for the right moment to bring forward evidence, well that moments now, were closing in lynch time and we need all the information we can get, regardless I will probably vote for Acro or Layabout before I vote for you.
gumshoe bullshitting at 120%~~Prplz
Sinensis
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2513 Posts
March 22 2012 23:21 GMT
#391
I am getting less suspicious of Oberyn the more he posts.

Xatalos how many games of mafia have you played? I'm reading your filter and most of your posts are just wishy-washy paraphrasing of extremely obvious facts with the occasional smiley mixed in.
GreYMisT
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States6736 Posts
March 22 2012 23:23 GMT
#392
On March 23 2012 08:13 Alderan wrote:
As for Greymist, I was waiting to say anything because I wanted to read your response post to ensure that I was not wrong on my initial read, and I don't believe I was.

That said, I think Greymist is too experienced a player to actually believe a scum would make the mistakes gumshoe made early on. Any semi competent scum team would have identified gumshoe's posting as weak after asking about the mayor, and coached him through his next few posts.

Instead Greymist suggested that the scum stood idly by and watched Greymist go blue fishing the very first day.....

Right.....



You have a misunderstanding about how active some scumteams are about regulating their member's posting.

But I will give you that. If you notice I have unvoted Gumshoe and voted Obryn some time ago.

One thing I am not comfortable with this game is the posting of Sandro/Syllo. They are playing very erractically, suddenly changing their minds from extreme to extreme. Not enough for me to call for their lynch right off the bat, but come on guys, posting "X is town, Y is Scum" now "Z is Scum, X and Y are both town" are not good enough reasons for me, nor have they ever been. You are coasting on your "vet" status, and many of the newer players are letting you get away with it. I'd like to see what you have done to earn that status.
"life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery" / Join TL Mafia! http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/index.php?show_part=31
gumshoe
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Canada3602 Posts
March 22 2012 23:25 GMT
#393
On March 23 2012 08:13 Alderan wrote:
As for Greymist, I was waiting to say anything because I wanted to read your response post to ensure that I was not wrong on my initial read, and I don't believe I was.

That said, I think Greymist is too experienced a player to actually believe a scum would make the mistakes gumshoe made early on. Any semi competent scum team would have identified gumshoe's posting as weak after asking about the mayor, and coached him through his next few posts.

Instead Greymist suggested that the scum stood idly by and watched Greymist go blue fishing the very first day.....

Right.....



you mean me go blue fishing? For the record I know Grey mist was wrong about me, but that doesn't make his pressure scummy, maybe he just didn't look too much into it and called out what he thought was scummy play?
gumshoe bullshitting at 120%~~Prplz
Alderan
Profile Joined September 2010
United States463 Posts
March 22 2012 23:30 GMT
#394
On March 23 2012 08:25 gumshoe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 23 2012 08:13 Alderan wrote:
As for Greymist, I was waiting to say anything because I wanted to read your response post to ensure that I was not wrong on my initial read, and I don't believe I was.

That said, I think Greymist is too experienced a player to actually believe a scum would make the mistakes gumshoe made early on. Any semi competent scum team would have identified gumshoe's posting as weak after asking about the mayor, and coached him through his next few posts.

Instead Greymist suggested that the scum stood idly by and watched Greymist go blue fishing the very first day.....

Right.....



you mean me go blue fishing? For the record I know Grey mist was wrong about me, but that doesn't make his pressure scummy, maybe he just didn't look too much into it and called out what he thought was scummy play?



The point is he's too good to over look that in my eyes.
gumshoe
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Canada3602 Posts
March 22 2012 23:35 GMT
#395
On March 23 2012 08:30 Alderan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 23 2012 08:25 gumshoe wrote:
On March 23 2012 08:13 Alderan wrote:
As for Greymist, I was waiting to say anything because I wanted to read your response post to ensure that I was not wrong on my initial read, and I don't believe I was.

That said, I think Greymist is too experienced a player to actually believe a scum would make the mistakes gumshoe made early on. Any semi competent scum team would have identified gumshoe's posting as weak after asking about the mayor, and coached him through his next few posts.

Instead Greymist suggested that the scum stood idly by and watched Greymist go blue fishing the very first day.....

Right.....



you mean me go blue fishing? For the record I know Grey mist was wrong about me, but that doesn't make his pressure scummy, maybe he just didn't look too much into it and called out what he thought was scummy play?



The point is he's too good to over look that in my eyes.


Fair point, but he didn't just tunnel me, he moved on when better targets showed up and he's still doing that, also he's not making up shit, he's putting information out there, even if he is scum he's being more helpful than most of the townies in this game(myself included) I wouldn't lynch him right away on meta for the same reason I wouldn't lynch you right away on meta, because we stand too much to lose and he's not a threat atm.
gumshoe bullshitting at 120%~~Prplz
Alderan
Profile Joined September 2010
United States463 Posts
March 22 2012 23:38 GMT
#396
Layabout who should we vote for if not for you?
DoYouHas
Profile Joined November 2008
United States1140 Posts
March 22 2012 23:40 GMT
#397
First off, we should stop talking about gumshoe like he is a noob, or that he is bad. He is neither. This is like his 4-5th game and in the games I have played with him he has shown he can make good analysis as well as be devious. At some point I draw the line and hold him accountable for what he says early on in a game in spite of his reckless streak. That being said, I do lean town for him currently. I just wanted to point out that, to me, it was not bad play from Grey to push gumshoe for his highly questionable early game.

Also, I think Alderan is scum. More on this soon, I'll get to writing up my case.

##Unvote: Oberyn
##Vote: Alderan
Guts? Determination? $5?
gumshoe
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Canada3602 Posts
March 22 2012 23:46 GMT
#398
I also dont see much worth in the oberon case right now, some of his biggest pushers(layabout) are heavy lurkers/low content posters and hes not exactly been posting nonsense, yes he attacks me the obvius target but at least hes bringing up an argument for it and not just saying I'm scummy, he also hasnt been afraid to pressure people. Finally his list(while dumb by sheer virtue of being a list) has solid points and preferences, it's not just random junk. I do not think Oberon is scum, the arguments against him can easily be brought up against several other people and there are better targets out there(like lay and acro)
gumshoe bullshitting at 120%~~Prplz
layabout
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United Kingdom2600 Posts
March 22 2012 23:47 GMT
#399
Gumshoe for calling someboy (me) town and then voting for them (me).

However Evantress or Xatalos would also make good targets.

Maybe risk nuke.
Be the Best You Can Be ! Play MAFIA II http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/ II Dragonsound Best Band
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
March 22 2012 23:48 GMT
#400
So, despite the fact that gumshoe found similarities between Alderan's scum game and this one, and since he thinks layabout is a "reckless townie" (reckless not often being a trait of scum), gumshoe has voted...layabout.

Good god people, do you even read your own posts? And you wonder why I troll.
Prev 1 18 19 20 21 22 73 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 4m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech132
EnDerr 12
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 710
Shinee 132
910 100
NaDa 18
NotJumperer 18
League of Legends
JimRising 587
Other Games
summit1g5838
ceh9603
Happy267
Livibee139
Pyrionflax88
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH385
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Light_VIP 9
• iopq 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1224
• Lourlo1027
• Jankos386
Upcoming Events
Kung Fu Cup
3h 4m
RotterdaM Event
8h 19m
Replay Cast
16h 4m
The PondCast
1d 2h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
OSC
4 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
4 days
Mixu vs TBD
Spirit vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Soma vs Shuttle
BeSt vs Rush
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Leta vs ggaemo
Jaedong vs Queen
GSL
6 days
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Special KOR vs CHN
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Light Tournament 2026

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Escore Tournament S3: King of Kings
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.