EPTC9++ Mini Mafia - Page 38
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On March 22 2012 07:24 VisceraEyes wrote: So what's the deal? Do you think slOosh is scum? This is a long post, and all I really get from it is you trying to discredit me in one paragraph and agreeing with me in another. I can't tell what you think of slOosh from this post. What's the point of this post? Sloosh is scum. Gah! I am not discrediting you, I am explaining my actions because you guys seem to think I am mafia. Yes I thought you were scum on Day 1 but your vote makes you town now. I am responding to people individually, which in hindsight may not be the best way to do this. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On March 22 2012 07:26 VisceraEyes wrote: Also, I'm going to be playing the part of the wall you have to bang your head against today Probulous...good luck sir. Alright wall, what do you want to know? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On March 22 2012 07:35 Snarfs wrote: I know you keep using this word and I'm verifying that by 'hammer' you do indeed mean '2nd to last vote'? Yes, that is what I mean. He could easily have not voted for Jackal and stuck with his initial read if he was scum. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On March 22 2012 07:32 VisceraEyes wrote: Probulous I'm over here bro! You realize that you're defending yourself to the person you're saying we should all lynch right guy?! Yes, and? You seem to be taking his case seriously so I was addressing it. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Why am I "confirmed town" for my vote on Jackal? Why was I not scummy for defending Jackal (as sandroba seems to think) after Jackal flipped scum? Your attention was on me for the majority of the day, surely it didn't just escape your notice that I called him 'confirmed town' and was defending him for a fair portion of the day... Re: responding to slOosh's case - if you're town and think that slOosh is scum, you'd be interested in clearing your name with townies, not scum. Even in your response you say "you seem to be taking it seriously"...if it was about me, why didn't you respond to MY post on the matter, your townread, rather than slOosh's, your scumread? | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On March 22 2012 07:46 VisceraEyes wrote: Probulous: Why am I "confirmed town" for my vote on Jackal? Why was I not scummy for defending Jackal (as sandroba seems to think) after Jackal flipped scum? Your attention was on me for the majority of the day, surely it didn't just escape your notice that I called him 'confirmed town' and was defending him for a fair portion of the day... Re: responding to slOosh's case - if you're town and think that slOosh is scum, you'd be interested in clearing your name with townies, not scum. Even in your response you say "you seem to be taking it seriously"...if it was about me, why didn't you respond to MY post on the matter, your townread, rather than slOosh's, your scumread? Well there are a lot of posts to get through. I was working through them but realised answering everyone is not working. It doesn't matter to me where the case comes from. Your post mirrored his anyway. You are not scummy because you chose to vote for Jackal when you didn't have to. His lynch was basically everyone sheeping sandroba and you had made it clear you thought Jackal was town. Of all the people in this thread you had a reasonable explanation for not voting for Jackal. But you chose to nail him to the wall. I just don't see why you would buss a potentially strong scum buddy on day 1. The only one who was really pushing you was me. Sure sandroba was a little skeptical of you but you were in no danger of being lynched. The upside was minimal compared to losing a scum buddy. There is nothing wrong with defending someone who is scum. Everyone does that at some time in the game because we don't know who scum are. Your actions, namely your vote, clears you in my mind. I'll find your post and respond to it now. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On March 22 2012 06:51 VisceraEyes wrote: I noticed that about Probulous too slOosh...the biggest actual stance he took yesterday was that I was scum based on my attack on johnnywup, which he ended up dissolving before the final vote stuff started happening. And after Jackal flipped scum, he didn't even look twice at me - just immediately voted for slOosh. If he were town and he had even an inkling that I was scum, wouldn't he be more convinced that I'm scum when Jackal (someone I called confirmed town early on and defended for a lot of D1) flipped scum? I think I have explained this now. Jackal flipping scum does not make you scum because you had every reason not to vote for him. You had made it clear you thought he was town, like very very clear. Defending scum does not make you scum. It makes you more suspicious especially if you don't vote for them. Your actions make you town in my eyes. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On March 22 2012 07:53 Probulous wrote: Well there are a lot of posts to get through. I was working through them but realised answering everyone is not working. It doesn't matter to me where the case comes from. Your post mirrored his anyway. You are not scummy because you chose to vote for Jackal when you didn't have to. His lynch was basically everyone sheeping sandroba and you had made it clear you thought Jackal was town. Of all the people in this thread you had a reasonable explanation for not voting for Jackal. But you chose to nail him to the wall. I just don't see why you would buss a potentially strong scum buddy on day 1. The only one who was really pushing you was me. Sure sandroba was a little skeptical of you but you were in no danger of being lynched. The upside was minimal compared to losing a scum buddy. There is nothing wrong with defending someone who is scum. Everyone does that at some time in the game because we don't know who scum are. Your actions, namely your vote, clears you in my mind. I'll find your post and respond to it now. You really can't think of an upside? Really? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On March 22 2012 07:53 Probulous wrote: Well there are a lot of posts to get through. I was working through them but realised answering everyone is not working. It doesn't matter to me where the case comes from. Your post mirrored his anyway. You are not scummy because you chose to vote for Jackal when you didn't have to. His lynch was basically everyone sheeping sandroba and you had made it clear you thought Jackal was town. Of all the people in this thread you had a reasonable explanation for not voting for Jackal. But you chose to nail him to the wall. I just don't see why you would buss a potentially strong scum buddy on day 1. The only one who was really pushing you was me. Sure sandroba was a little skeptical of you but you were in no danger of being lynched. The upside was minimal compared to losing a scum buddy. There is nothing wrong with defending someone who is scum. Everyone does that at some time in the game because we don't know who scum are. Your actions, namely your vote, clears you in my mind. I'll find your post and respond to it now. Really really? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On March 22 2012 07:58 VisceraEyes wrote: You really can't think of an upside? Really? If you were scum, your choice was this
Now the downside to unvoting would have been? Well you would have looked scummier for causing a no-lynch but hell so did everyone else who didn't vote for Jackal. You had a reason not to and he could come back Day 2 and prove his "innocence" anyway. I mean no-one would have known he was scum if he didn't swing. If he did eventually get lynched you could change your position and bus him then. No the upside is so ridiculously small for the costs that I just don't see why you would do it. It made no rational sense for me to continue my line of enquiry because to me you were confirmed. So I looked elsewhere. | ||
|
Toad_in_Pink_Dress
United States50 Posts
But are there intentions benign? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Fucks sake. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
What is wrong with my reasoning because it still makes sense to me? Votes > words in my opinion. Explain this to me because I am completely at a loss as to why this makes me scum. I am town and have followed the same logic I use every game so if there is something fundamentally wrong in my thinking, point it out. Otherwise I am going to get mis-lynched again. Does everyone else understand what VE is saying? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On March 22 2012 08:19 Probulous wrote: VE I don't understand your case. I am scum because I didn't think you were mafia after you voted for Jackal? What is wrong with my reasoning because it still makes sense to me? Votes > words in my opinion. Explain this to me because I am completely at a loss as to why this makes me scum. I am town and have followed the same logic I use every game so if there is something fundamentally wrong in my thinking, point it out. Otherwise I am going to get mis-lynched again. Does everyone else understand what VE is saying? I'm taking a step back. Maybe reread your filter. If you still look like scum, I'll try and explain it to you again. In the meantime, I'll just point out that the italicized statement in the quote above indicates inherent self-guilt. If you'll notice, there's a fair amount of resistance to switching off slOosh...but I'm sure it doesn't feel that way to you. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 22 2012 08:19 Probulous wrote:Does everyone else understand what VE is saying? Not a fucking clue, but what else is new? He's confused me all game. | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
On March 22 2012 08:19 Probulous wrote: Does everyone else understand what VE is saying? not really, this is way over my head right now @_@ i'll vote for whoever sand votes for, really.. also TIPD what the fuck have you done all game anyways? post randomly about who you think is scum and whos inno, and then vote occasionally? | ||
| ||
