|
On March 08 2012 15:14 Maverick32x wrote:
I really think we are pressuring the wrong guy if we are targeting Dim.... I completely agree with Trackd00r that we need to target one of those 3 lurkers.
Gunman, pablols or sufficiency... I would say the order that makes the most sense is the one I just listed... if we have a DT remaining, they should investigate sufficiency and hope hes just a regular mafia so we can set up a hit on the following day (assuming we get this next lynch correct)
My vote right now is for Gunman. I'm thinking that we are pointing fingers at each other while Mafia just slide into the background.... It seems like the remaining town are in a frenzy to try to stay alive and solve this... while the remaining people are not involved in this at all....
This is my assumption too. Of the three I'm thinking Gunman is the most likely candidate, but it's hard to say with them being so inactive in the late game. I have to look into this further before I vote.
I would say Sufficiency is the least likely to be mafia, but that's only if I can make the assumption that this early posts were to get reads on their reactions, and not just bad play. The posts I'm referencing:
On March 01 2012 13:15 Sufficiency wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On March 01 2012 13:10 trackd00r wrote:
Suffciency, If you are willing to random lynch anyone, which player it would be? I hardly see a point of RL someone later on this day because we already might have better reads in that moment. If you want to take this action, throw a name by now. I don't really like the idea though.
Going to bed now. See you in about 9 hours. I actually FoS gunman103 right now for suggesting no RL.
On March 01 2012 13:16 Sufficiency wrote:+ Show Spoiler +
Oh great. Now he is defensive about it.
Anyway, since it's not the time to vote yet, we might as well wait until everyone talked a few lines.
On March 02 2012 12:45 Sufficiency wrote:+ Show Spoiler +
I say we lynch OtoshimonoU or gunman103
Later, I tried to confirm which it was, and sadly his answer was:
On March 02 2012 20:18 Sufficiency wrote:Show nested quote +On March 02 2012 17:59 DimmuKlok wrote:
Sufficiency, while you're here could you explain to me in more detail why you chose OtoshimonoU and gunman103? gutty feelings.
|
On March 08 2012 09:16 willz22912 wrote:
To blubbdavid:
How would killing a townie after he supports you be a risky tactic after the poor events of Day1? There was hardly any participation, the majority of players Day1 had low post counts, DimmuKlok and Mementoss were one of the most active. Would anyone have any good reason why Mementoss was targetted or any supsects? No, of course not, there was little information, and no reason to suspect DimmuKlok at this time. Do you really think that all mafia just try and lurk as much as possible? It's fairly obvious to go after lurkers, but it is not obvious to go after people who are the most active. Being active does not and should not give you the automatic feeling that someone is town, nor should it be a defense. Take a look at DimmuKlok's filter yourself and see how much useful information he really does post. It's not a lot, but hey he's active right?
By removing the only other active poster and having so much credibility, DimmuKlok dispels a lot of suspicion towards him, which is what Mafia would want! But even if you disregard how the Night kills may or may not have affected DimmuKlok, can you explain his behavior with Sufficiency, or the fact that he called me out and then retracted it with a "I guess my case wasn't that strong" when numerous people jumped to my defense? Why make a case against me at all then if you're not confident in your read.
He says my vote against him is a scare tactic, at least I'm willing to stand by my case and defend it until he posts a convincing defense besides one paragraph. In fact, I'm interested in seeing DimmuKlok's opinion on who we should vote for, considering you all believe he is still town.
I think that killing the most active townie while he supports you is a bad decision. Why would you kill the only player who sorta "trusts" you? As I said, I agree on your other points, especially on the interaction with Sufficiency, but the Kill policy just doesn't want to get in my head.
My vote is still on gunman right now. His fast push on rainmaker makes him suspicious.
|
Hey guys, I still haven't been able to read through the thread. As of now I don't feel confident enough to make any reads.
I'll make sure to read through everything and vote today though, I hate midterms.
|
Sufficiency and gunman, now would be a good time to post.
On March 08 2012 23:12 Pablols wrote:
Hey guys, I still haven't been able to read through the thread. As of now I don't feel confident enough to make any reads.
I'll make sure to read through everything and vote today though, I hate midterms.
So what you're saying is you're busy, you have no reads, and it we shouldn't be surprised if we don't see any useful posts out of you up until the lynch. Got it. If you are town, this is why we're going to lose. If you're mafia, keep up the good work!
|
Only two hours left... What would happen if it continued like this?
|
In the interest of still trying to win as town, if I drop my vote on DimmuKlok because no one will go along with it, should I be voting gunman and hoping for the best?
|
Yes, better a lynch than none.
|
Goddamn, what's happening? This will result into a mass modkill.
|
I'm gonna gamble on Gunman....
|
This is going to end either quite good, or horribly bad.
I'm voting for Gunman103. I already gave a read on him. At this point is pretty much him or a no-lynch...
Even if gunman, sufficiency or pablols flip town, their play was indeed a very deep punch for all us as town. I mean, if you are going to play a mafia game, please at least try to invest some time on it :/
+ Show Spoiler +I just hope that my vote announcement is a worthy thing to post since I hit zealot icon with it. Please, let it be!!
|
I went with Gunman. Obviously it's our only option at this point.
|
Isn't the Night post overdue? I need to go to bed.
|
Look who we have here now...
On March 09 2012 10:01 Sufficiency wrote:
##Vote: Gunman103
Sufficiency, why are you doing this? You saved yourself of barely getting modkilled if the game continues on. You are scum in front of my eyes.
Please, explain.
Town, if you want to win this game, lynch this guy if he doesn't come with a response.
|
On March 09 2012 10:13 blubbdavid wrote:
Isn't the Night post overdue? I need to go to bed.
Pretty sure there's about an hour left to vote.
|
Dimmu, what do you say to willz fast change of heart?
|
Guys, don't you realize that Sufficiency went literally 2 days inactive, and no appears out of nowhere and cast his vote just 1 hour before the deadline?
Doesn't it scream scum to you?
I'm giving you one more chance. Vote sufficiency.
|
Wait what, it was trackdoor who has done it, not willz, sorry for the confusion.
|
First and foremost, it screams bandwagoning to me. And he's probably too lazy to write anything.
|
On March 09 2012 10:32 blubbdavid wrote:
Wait what, it was trackdoor who has done it, not willz, sorry for the confusion.
It's too late. We need to lynch gunman.
|
Blubb, I'm completely serious.
Don't you believe the facts? Don't you find scummy that Sufficiency went in minutes before a lynch and just voted, ignoring completely any current discussion?
You are making no sense to me now. Neither Sufficiency is.
Mave, Willz, please. The evidence is right in front of your eyes. Change your vote
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
