|
On February 22 2012 05:09 Palmar wrote:
lulz, failtown is fail
I'm afk. Nayvoting any team that isn't exactly the team I suggested.
This is also anti-town. There are 5 townies. Not just the three you think you've identified. This tells me that you're not interested in actually trying to find a reasonable team, you have a reason for choosing this specific team.
Give me a reason not to switch to a Nayvote Palmar, if you're not too much of a pompous ass.
|
On February 22 2012 05:15 Palmar wrote:
no one on the team is questionable.
Either I'm terrible at mafia for suggesting a team with scum on it, or I'm scum.
Because I don't think I'm terrible at mafia, bye extension everyone who nayvotes the team is saying I must be scum, because I'm not bad.
Thus this game is stupid because everyone playing it is stupid.
If this game is stupid it means you are stupid because you are playing it. If you are stupid then you can suggest a team with a scum on it because you are stupid.
Scum's not even making sense anymoar.
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
Your story really is that at the time you picked the team, you really thought Navillus was the best 3rd man after Dirk? That Navillus is unquestionable? Because I have plenty of questions for Navillus, and plenty of questions, now, for you.
|
|
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
Yeah 6 town, 3 scum is the setup.
also inb4 Palmar OMGUSes and says scumteam is VE Sent BH
|
I don't know why he'd think I'm scum - I've yay-voted his team.
|
On February 22 2012 05:18 Blazinghand wrote:
Yeah 6 town, 3 scum is the setup.
also inb4 Palmar OMGUSes and says scumteam is VE Sent BH
I'm actually thinking about using that team.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 22 2012 05:14 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 05:10 kitaman27 wrote:
I sent my nay vote in as well. Doesn't make much sense to me to support a team where I'm not a part of on day one. You're severely limiting town's options with this mindset - if everyone adopted it, there'd be no way to get a 5 person majority. I don't like this post at all.
If you're town, are you saying that you're more confidant that you can select three other townies than yourself and two other townies? It's basic math. I'm not sure why I should be concerned with limiting town's options if it increases town's chances of victory.
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
On February 22 2012 05:20 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 05:14 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 22 2012 05:10 kitaman27 wrote:
I sent my nay vote in as well. Doesn't make much sense to me to support a team where I'm not a part of on day one. You're severely limiting town's options with this mindset - if everyone adopted it, there'd be no way to get a 5 person majority. I don't like this post at all. If you're town, are you saying that you're more confidant that you can select three other townies than yourself and two other townies? It's basic math. I'm not sure why I should be concerned with limiting town's options if it increases town's chances of victory.
Right but if everyone followed your logic no team would get more than 3 votes, because nobody would vote for teams that didn't include themselves. You understand the basic flaw here right? Or are you intentionally being dense
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 22 2012 05:21 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 05:20 kitaman27 wrote:On February 22 2012 05:14 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 22 2012 05:10 kitaman27 wrote:
I sent my nay vote in as well. Doesn't make much sense to me to support a team where I'm not a part of on day one. You're severely limiting town's options with this mindset - if everyone adopted it, there'd be no way to get a 5 person majority. I don't like this post at all. If you're town, are you saying that you're more confidant that you can select three other townies than yourself and two other townies? It's basic math. I'm not sure why I should be concerned with limiting town's options if it increases town's chances of victory. Right but if everyone followed your logic no team would get more than 3 votes, because nobody would vote for teams that didn't include themselves. You understand the basic flaw here right? Or are you intentionally being dense
I guess that's where I have to convince everyone else that I'm the best choice then, isn't it 
|
On February 22 2012 05:20 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 05:14 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 22 2012 05:10 kitaman27 wrote:
I sent my nay vote in as well. Doesn't make much sense to me to support a team where I'm not a part of on day one. You're severely limiting town's options with this mindset - if everyone adopted it, there'd be no way to get a 5 person majority. I don't like this post at all. If you're town, are you saying that you're more confidant that you can select three other townies than yourself and two other townies? It's basic math. I'm not sure why I should be concerned with limiting town's options if it increases town's chances of victory.
No, that's not what I'm saying - I'm saying that by telling town that you'll nay-vote any team that you're not a part of, you're forcing town to consider you as a part of their team by virtue of them having a guaranteed nay-vote if they don't. I expect you and everyone else to include themselves on their own D1 team, not to would be ridiculous, but that's not what you said - you said you'd nay-vote any team you're not a part of. That's scummy as shit Kita.
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
Scumteam Palmar Kita Chaos calling it now
|
Kita the only thing you got going for you know is that you are/were pretty ignorant about the setup suggesting you aren't scum. But as I have no way to know that it is not a play its hard to convince me that you are town.
|
Kitaman is being so dumb he could be town.
VE could be town....
maaaaybe prplhz? He seems genuinely afk, not sure what it means. But he could also be scum. Like sentinel and chaoser are also kinda scummy, but one of them is probably town, of those three that is. I'm not sure though
BH is just scum for being intentionally dumb, and so much of an asshole about it that he's pulling dumb people with him.
|
That scumteam would be imba...I don't think Forumite would do that.
|
also remember I'm confirmed town
|
Blazinghand
United States25553 Posts
Oh shit I forgot about prplhz since he's been so inactive U_U also it's possible Forumite RNGEd it, since last game it was a pretty solid scumteam
|
On February 22 2012 05:25 Dirkzor wrote:
Kita the only thing you got going for you know is that you are/were pretty ignorant about the setup suggesting you aren't scum. But as I have no way to know that it is not a play its hard to convince me that you are town.
In what way does ignorance of the setup indicate town? Scum are not able to communicate with each other, so it's just as possible for scum to not understand the setup as it is for town.
|
On February 22 2012 05:26 Palmar wrote:
also remember I'm confirmed town
You're toeing the line with posts that suggest that you'll nay-vote any team that isn't the team you've put forth.
|
VE: if he was scum he would already know that scum was not allowed to communicate out of this thread. (had he tried to contact them they would have told him. Or so i assume) The other things he don't know only enforces that he really did not know about the scum communcation had to be in-thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
