EPTOn February 22 2012 02:53 Palmar wrote:
is your plan to spam away your incompetence and stupidity?
is your plan to spam away your incompetence and stupidity?
>three posts in a row
>says i'm spamming
Resistance 2 - Tunnel Rats - Page 12
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
>three posts in a row >says i'm spamming | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
That's not the team you suggested before. Now I have to go back and decide if I think Navillus is worth sending - in spite of already saying that I don't think he is. Tell me this sir. What makes you think "apathy" is an acceptable townie trait to risk the D1 mission on? You really didn't have ANY other town-reads? None?! NOT A SINGLE ONE OTHER THAN THE GUY WHO DIDN'T SUBMIT A TEAM?! This throws me off. I need time. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
Anyweiz - I'm really curious about why Palmar is sending Navillus. On February 21 2012 19:47 Palmar wrote: It's not bad play to take navillus, it's logical. You see, the advantage of this game is that you have to find townies, not scum. And it's in general much easier to find townies than it is to find scum. Like it's generally hard in a normal mafia game to eliminate a few townies from the lynch candidates, and then lynch into the rest of the people, which increases your chance of hitting scum. And while telling apart scum and lazy/bad/scummy townies is hard, it's much easier to pick out the few townies that normally would not get discussed for a lynch. This seems like mindless repetition to me. I think you could express this in a third of the text that you actually typed. So yeah, I think it's very, very unlikely navillus could allow himself to be so uncertain, so indecisive and so indifferent about the game if he was scum, it screams to me apathetic townie with a lack of confidence. I've already said Dirkzor is a good choice. Or, you know, not choosing a team means nothing to analyze. I'm not going to say outright that Navillus is a spy, but he could have at least suggested a team. So what does this make me? Sadly you can't really tell much about my alignment even if my picks are good, because it makes sense for scum to pick two townies to join on the mission. so it's either or. It makes no sense to say navillus is bad choice and thus I'm scum. Either navillus is bad choice (scum) and I'm a bad townie, or navillus is good choice and I'm scum, or the obvious and probably correct alternative Navillus is a good choice and I'm town. ...this is coming from you so I'm not going to assume you're a stupid scum who's trying to place the blame on Nav if this plan goes south. Seeing as I think I've already convinced most people on TL I'm kind of good at this, you should as scum be pushing the idea that I'm scum, and thus the team can't be accepted. You can't say "Navillus looks bad, thus palmar is scum" because that makes no sense for a scum team to do. Due to the risk of town just not picking anyone from the first team if the first team fails. So, which is it BH? Am I scum? or is navillus scum? You can't have it both ways. He's not trustworthy enough to be on the team. And thus I will vote nay once I get home. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
:D Do people think there'd be such resistance to a day 1 team with a scummy on it? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
| ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
I don't like scum on my team. Hence I'm sorry but I'm going to have to refuse. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
I'm afk. Nayvoting any team that isn't exactly the team I suggested. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On February 22 2012 05:09 Palmar wrote: lulz, failtown is fail I'm afk. Nayvoting any team that isn't exactly the team I suggested. wat | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On February 22 2012 05:10 kitaman27 wrote: I sent my nay vote in as well. Doesn't make much sense to me to support a team where I'm not a part of on day one. This is a terrible team, and I'm glad you voted Nay. That being said, if everyone followed your philosophy no team would ever get above 3 votes. Think about at least considering supporting a team without you if you think it is 3 town players, should someone suggest one. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On February 22 2012 04:56 Palmar wrote: look at them scum come out of the woods to tear my team apart. :D Do people think there'd be such resistance to a day 1 team with a scummy on it? Yes Palmar. I'd expect any townies who don't like your choices to come in here and voice their concerns. Why do you feel like no one would be concerned with a D1 team with a scummy on it? Certainly the scums wouldn't mind - but if it's someone questionable, why wouldn't town be concerned? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On February 22 2012 05:10 kitaman27 wrote: I sent my nay vote in as well. Doesn't make much sense to me to support a team where I'm not a part of on day one. You're severely limiting town's options with this mindset - if everyone adopted it, there'd be no way to get a 5 person majority. I don't like this post at all. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
Either I'm terrible at mafia for suggesting a team with scum on it, or I'm scum. Because I don't think I'm terrible at mafia, bye extension everyone who nayvotes the team is saying I must be scum, because I'm not bad. Thus this game is stupid because everyone playing it is stupid. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 22 2012 05:12 Blazinghand wrote: This is a terrible team, and I'm glad you voted Nay. That being said, if everyone followed your philosophy no team would ever get above 3 votes. Think about at least considering supporting a team without you if you think it is 3 town players, should someone suggest one. Well its gives us the best odds for having a successful mission one and building upon that mission. I don't mind drawing out the voting a while if it gives us the best chance of winning. Is there a punishment if we can decide on a team within a certain amount of time? | ||
| ||
