|
On February 01 2012 10:55 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 10:50 redFF wrote:On February 01 2012 10:50 Blazinghand wrote:On February 01 2012 10:48 redFF wrote:
you really think we were talking in code? Best case scenario, Refallen's actions there are null read, but he's still a guy who's contributed nothing and basically been actively unhelpful all game. As opposed to your spearheading of the excellent radfield day 1 lynch. Ah yes you're right I basically made the case against radfield, and pushed him all day, and definitely wasn't trying to push someone else or something and had my hand forced to go for him instead of bum. Your characterization of my actions is accurate as usual.
Voting for radfield day 1 was terrible and inexcusable so i don't care what you have to say.
|
You are a derp, like Cwave, and will be ignored until such a time I see fit.
|
If I was scum I wouldn't know you were the truth since I wouldn't know who my buddies were.
|
I don't care about him.
He wasn't on the Rad wagon, therefore I am not touching him.
|
On February 01 2012 11:26 Lanaia wrote:
Clearly we've gotten so far with lynching people on the rad wagon that we obviously need to do it again. x.x
yup
|
I'm sorry but I refuse to believe there wasn't AT LEAST 2 scum on that rad wagon.
I also don't think the rad wagon was a major part of why a lot of people voted bum yesterday.
|
On February 01 2012 12:13 Blazinghand wrote:
redFF no more dodging: do you think refallen is scummy?
I'm not dodging, I simply don't care.
|
Jackal is taunting me because he knows I know he is scum but you idiots won't lynch him.
|
|
|
null-town
mainly just new and inactive though.
|
anyone wanna discuss the nokill?
|
If i'm scum then vote me jackal.
|
On February 01 2012 12:53 Lanaia wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2012 09:09 GreYMisT wrote:
Vote count at time of lynch.
Radfield (6): Meapak_Ziphh, Cwave, Jackal58, Bumatlarge, Mr. Wiggles, Blazinghand
We know at least two of those people were town. We saw two flip. There are two more I'm unwilling to lynch. And the other two seem town, so... (since the replacement, at least). I'm no longer going to lynch people off that wagon until I have a reason where I really should. The nokill baffles me.
THE REASON THAT YOU SHOULD IS BECAUSE IT WAS A FUCKING AWFUL WAGON AND I HAVE TOO MUCH FAITH IN THIS COMMUNITY TO BELIEVE THAT IT WAS ALL TOWN.
|
On February 01 2012 15:13 Refallen wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 13:07 Hesmyrr wrote:There's enough scummy lurkers in this game that one of them has to be scum. ##Vote ScampNavillus and Refallen also better contribute today, if you guys slack off because of this vote you'll be unpleasantly surprised. And the other two seem town, so... (since the replacement, at least) Seriously, Lanaia? Rofl ##Vote Hesmyrr
This I don't understand, please explain.
I would be fine with a scamp lynch but I'd prefer a Jackal.
|
Am i really going to have to make a case?
fuck you all.
|
Dealing with idiocy is hard. Thank you BH.
|
On February 02 2012 02:07 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2012 02:04 Hesmyrr wrote:Jackal. If you are so certain Refallen is scum, why aren't you voting him, or in fact excluded him on your scum-list? Also still waiting for your response Refallen. My scum list was 3 I hadn't voted for. And my vote is going to go on Refallen. redFF seemed to be begging for another vote. Fwiw I don't really see red as scum. I'm just calling him scum to piss him off. Cause that's like a hobby of mine.
Too late bro, when I get home tonight I'm bringing the fire.
|
Spends all of day 1 pushing Radfield on his plan which wasn't scummy. It was an argument about gameplay. Radfield's position regarding his plan was not indicative of alignment but dumb people were sheeping on to the wagon and Jackal jumped at the opportunity to lynch town rad day 1.On January 27 2012 09:51 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2012 07:55 bumatlarge wrote:And on that note, it's no where near certain that cwave slipped, he just might have done his homework. (from last game) CELL LEADER:
Your entire life has been devoted to running your tiny cell of agents. The time has come to put them into action. You know the names of all other Agents. You always returns "Insufficient Information for Analysis" to investigations. Each night, you will recieve a list of agents and their votes. In the event of a TIE in voting, or if ALL nominations are agents, you may cast tiebreaking vote. In the event of death, flips Cell Leader and a new Cell Leader is chosen by RNG between remaining Agents. You may send a message consisting of 5 words or 20 characters to any agent at dawn and dusk of each day. Submit it like a normal action. The message can't contain the name of any player. The message is PM'd to both myself and chaoser. We will send it to the player you specify. Cute attempts to get around the "No Names" rule or the word/char limit will result in the message being "lost". Feel free to crumb, just don't put the name (or any form of the name) in there. If all agents are dead, you may choose each kill. iGrok didn't put this in the OP so it is very possible this role isn't in the game, or at least it functions very differently. It appears to not be in play. The OP states they each send a message and they each receive all broadcasts. It still appears to me that Radfield was breadcrumbing info in his post regarding More scum Less scum. I can think of no other reason to state that the way he did.
##VOTE: Radfield.
Really dude?
This pretty much sums it up. That post is vague as fuck and clearly proves my point.
There was no case.
On January 27 2012 23:16 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2012 23:04 Radfield wrote:Yeah, I think Cwave is a bad lynch right now. I also think Navillus is a poor lynch, his posting doesn't strike me as scummy. Wigles Wrote: Yes, because mafia can't use abbreviated language unless someone posts a public key, which you did. If you had just posted with the same letters or numbers, then it's no longer a key that can be used to shorten scum communications. Now they just went from only having a binary designation, to having gradations to communicate their reads to their team, which isn't exactly useful for the town.
You're right, and I kinda wish I hadn't posted that. However I doubt it will be particularly useful for mafia. The only reason I posted it in the first place was to try and illustrate my point, which several people thought(and still think!) was just about semantics. On January 27 2012 09:51 Jackal58 wrote:
It appears to not be in play. The OP states they each send a message and they each receive all broadcasts. It still appears to me that Radfield was breadcrumbing info in his post regarding More scum Less scum. I can think of no other reason to state that the way he did.
##VOTE: Radfield. Can you please point out what you're talking about? I'm worried that you're still talking about this paragraph:
We need to ensure this does not happen. Therefore I propose that NO ONE call anyone else town. Players are either scummy, very scummy, definitely scum, OR not scum. That is all. If you think someone is almost for sure town, you still just have to call them 'not scum'.
Do you honestly not understand the point I was trying to make? And where is the so called breadcrumb in this post? And to what effect? Are you for real? Do you not understand how this game works? Of course you understand how this game works. It is day 1. Scum are clueless until their first messages are sent. I understand exactly what you were saying. But the way you say it is like a fucking beacon. Why did you feel compelled to create new terminology for "town". It makes no fucking sense unless you want to put out a post that is absolutely incapable of being missed by the other agents. You're scum. And just so there is no misunderstanding I understand exactly what your "plan" (It's not really a plan it's common sense) is doing. No I have no issue with the premise you put forth regarding calling out our town reads. It's the invented terminology you created to do it. It's bullshit. There was no reason for it except to give you an unambiguous means to message your fellow sleeper agents. And trust me. I will not be calling you "not scum" anytime soon. You need to die today. You're saying Rad came up with his plan to send a message to the other scum? Your case was purely hypothetical with no proof.
Rad's plan could be a way to send a secret code to the other scum!
So could anything anyone ever posts in the game. The case that he created it in order to send other messages to the scum was fucking ridiculous. But hey, rad lynch day 1 is rad lynch day 1 yo.
On January 30 2012 03:58 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2012 03:50 redFF wrote:On January 28 2012 08:34 Jackal58 wrote:
Was the scum team allowed to send out their first messages with the first day post? Why'd you ask this question? Jackal is probably scum btdubz Because that changes whether or not they have as yet been able to identify each other. In the first Sleeper cell it required a minimum of 3 days for scum to know who each other were. This set up is much different.
Why didn't you ask this question before voting radfield to help confirm whether your suspicions of him breadcrumbing a code were correct? Oh right because you already know the answer and you asked a dumb question for towncred lolololol.
This was a response to a question regarding whether scum have power roles
On February 02 2012 06:52 Jackal58 wrote:
No idea. Didn't have any in the first Sleeper Cell.
so then why did you vote refallen here?
On January 29 2012 23:17 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2012 22:15 Refallen wrote:
I voted him because he obviously had some sort of role related reason why he was asking people to vote. And since scum has no special powers, I figured he was a blue and thus I voted him...?
How is that scummy? The fuck? You know this how???? And I never called nor implied you were scum. I simply asked why. You have my vote. ##VOTE: Refallen Given what you just said it's a reasonable assumption to make.
Once again, another shitty reason for a shitty vote.
Refallen is today's "easy lynch" that anyone can sheep onto without looking suspicious in the slightest, and when he flips town(which he probably will) it will be easy to wave away with an "he was scummy and lurking anyway so w/e". Nope.
He didn't vote Bum because he thought Bum was scum (I know I sure did)
Now for Jackal on red,
On January 31 2012 09:52 Jackal58 wrote:You'd be better off shooting me tonight scum.
Here is Jackal's first post indicating suspicion of me
here's the first time I call jackal scum (I also mentioned him during night 1)
On January 30 2012 03:50 redFF wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2012 08:34 Jackal58 wrote:
Was the scum team allowed to send out their first messages with the first day post? Why'd you ask this question? Jackal is probably scum btdubz
Him on me is pure reasonless OMGUS because he knows I caught him.
His other 2 suspects are Refallen and Lanaia, one of them is a VI mislynch waiting to happen led by Blazingscum who wanted to lynch MZ so bad but has barely mentioned scamp. The other is Lanaia, another easy ml who hasn't done much. He's playing safe and pushing shitty wagons because he know's half of you idiots won't call him out on it.
--
Blazinghand
You never answered this postOn January 30 2012 08:33 redFF wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2012 08:24 Blazinghand wrote:
Oh no wait hold on scratch that redFF is scum making stuff up to save his scumbuddy refallen since I caught them communicating in thread, and everything he said *IS* deceptive and does not accurately characterize my actions this game. How about that look brah, you said you didn't vote MZ yesterday because it wouldn't have affected anything because it would have been a 1 person wagon. Now you're voting refallen, a 1 person wagon.
EVERYONE ON JACKAL NOW GOGOGO
|
Jackal, BH, Scamp and some lurker
|
Voting Radfield, pushing MZ all day 1 then barely mentioning scamp day 2 (probably because he's his scumbuddy) and instead deciding to push the tasty easy mislynch of Refallen day 2 and 3. mmmmmm
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
