EPTWell if your vote was originally on Arctocod, who would you be shifting to now?
Election Mafia - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
Well if your vote was originally on Arctocod, who would you be shifting to now? | ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
On December 14 2011 11:02 evantrees wrote: because there is another hour to decide and felt like having a placeholder for the heck of it. ProfessorBadass is either going to convince me to vote for him or get me to vote for dues in that time from the looks of it ,until then a vote for TotallyNotTwoPeople. can't say a vote for Nisani201 is particularly though out sadly. I've said everything I have to say about the subject. Why don't you tell me what you think about what I've already said then? And why is Deus your other candidate? | ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
| ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
On December 14 2011 11:06 risk.nuke wrote: + Show Spoiler + On December 14 2011 11:02 Radfield wrote: OK, haven't read the last few pages yet, but I fully agree with this. ProfessorBadass, even though I have a slight scum read, should be the pardoner. Curu is a strong townie, and my day 1 reads are not the best. EVERYONE VOTE PROFESSORBADASS FOR PARDONER Now we stop talking about the election and talk about the lynch again. We are not lynching Zentor. He softclaimed blue, and did it in a way that newbie townies normally do it. For now, I am inclined to believe him. If mafia want to shoot him because of the blue-slip, great! Either way, we are NOT using our lynch on him. xsksc and refallen are the two targets I think we should look at. Both of them look very scummy if you read their filters. I'm not sure which one yet, but people should start discussing them. catching up now... look at how badass is looking for new bandwagon cases. Do you really want to risk putting him as pardoner? What bandwagons have I been looking for? I've been on Spaackle for hours. The only new bandwagon I would try to start now is yours due to your random running for office when your actions and motivations don't add up at all to how you acted during the first election. | ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
| ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
| ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
I actually really want a risk.nuke lynch right now. As I said before him and DropBear seemed to be pushing hidden agendas during the initial election. Then risk.nuke straight up said he doesn't like Arctocod in office but didn't run himself to keep it away from Arcto. Then after the withdraw event he suddenly wants to run to keep it away from scum, completely inconsistent with his actions during the first round of elections. He then tries to discredit me and push ideas onto me when clearly not even reading my posts (agenda for trying to smear the new election candidate). | ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
| ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
On December 14 2011 11:36 Spaackle wrote: IMHO, it feels kind of like ProfBA is trying to bandwagon me. While I admit that my posts have not been very town, I don't see where I'm giving people scumreads. @ProfBA Probably for Refallen or Nisani mostly because they've been lurking and what they have posted has looked a bit scummy. Maybe evantrees, for the same reasoning. It comes down to the Mafia mindset. It's extremely easy for Mafia to call people Town because they know they are Town but significantly harder for Mafia to call people Mafia because they know they are not. I really didn't like that you seemed to spend so much time on analysis then came up with two random targets and called them Townie with no scum reads. I also really don't like that you're now saying you want a Nisani lynch when before you had declared him as Townie. Blatant contradiction when Nisani hasn't posted at all in the intervening time. The only thing that's changed is that other people are starting to build on Nisani, which is pretty damning for you. But I think risk is bigger fish to fry right now. | ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
On December 14 2011 11:39 risk.nuke wrote: yeah you've disagreed with them... after I stopped them. You're so full of scum agenda it's through the roof. That is all you got on me. I am playing pro town and you're trying to get me lynched for something that you're still twisting to make me look bad desipte that I have explained why. I'm running now because if I didn't want the scum plan (to elect you) to suceed. You stopped it? Is that a fucking joke? In case you haven't noticed Nisani is still the leading wagon. It'd be infinitely easy for me if I were scum to bury myself on that wagon since I have a history of policy lynching Nisani/sinani. | ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
If you don't like risk consider this: On December 14 2011 05:49 Spaackle wrote: Nisani201: + Show Spoiler + On December 13 2011 10:53 Nisani201 wrote: Alright, I just caught up on the thread. 1. No Pardon should not be carried out until the very late game, where there's probably some weird scenario in which pardoning would be important. However I don't think we need to discuss that now because there are too many possibilities. 2. Radfield seems to be playing pro-town. Palmar is not taking his usual controversial stance that he normally seems to assume. This is not scummy (I even think he said somewhere that he was going to try out a new style) but at this point I trust Radfield a lot more. ##Vote: Radfield (for election) Nisani posts after lurking for quite some time and answers the questions I gave the lurkers. He gives some short answers and then doens't post anything for two hours. On December 13 2011 12:37 Nisani201 wrote: Zeks is a null-read for me. Yeah the scumslips are pretty stupid but in my experiences I've found that these easy D1 lynches don't go too well. If there are no other candidates besides him then I will definitely vote him. Otherwise I will wait for more. Nisani says that he doesn't have a read on zeks yet, but decides to wait until more info comes up. On December 13 2011 12:39 Nisani201 wrote: We could also lynch a lurker (such as TotallyNotTwoPeople). Again, I want more information. Suggests lynching a lurker, and gives TNTP as an example. Nothing really suspicious stands out here. On December 13 2011 14:11 Nisani201 wrote: I just read Greymist's analysis on Jistu and I think he is much more viable lynch then Zeks. Eiii, why are you voting MyZentor? You provided no reason other than a quote. Somewhat off topic: after playing in XLVII, this is much more relaxing... so much better not having 100 players or whatever it was that game. Decides that Jitsu is better than Zeks based on GreYMisT' analysis, then questions Eiii about his vote. Read: Lurking Town Nisani hasn't been posting much since the beginning, but what he has been posting has been fairly non-contradictory and he's done a bit of motive questioning. He just seems like a regular townie withour much to say. Two vastly contradicting opinions when the only thing that has changed is Town sentiment towards Nisani. I'm not a fan of lynching lurkers unless they've proven time and time again they're absolutely worthless players and they all look the damn same. On December 14 2011 11:36 Spaackle wrote: IMHO, it feels kind of like ProfBA is trying to bandwagon me. While I admit that my posts have not been very town, I don't see where I'm giving people scumreads. @ProfBA Probably for Refallen or Nisani mostly because they've been lurking and what they have posted has looked a bit scummy. Maybe evantrees, for the same reasoning. | ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
On December 14 2011 11:42 risk.nuke wrote: No scum would ever play the way I am doing right now. Scum doesn't want to be the ones who takes action. So say I'm scum and I lynch greymist who then would be town. Next day I would have to fight for my life not to get lynched not to mention all my town cred would be gone. Tell me that is scumplay. It seems scum took action to deny Arctocod bodyguard protection. Now that you're seeing it go to another Townie you're floundering and desperate. | ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
I would still rather hit risk but I would heavily prefer either one to one of the lurkers. | ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
| ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
wtf | ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
| ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
Think about it, when you were forced down I was the only candidate who had any buzz at all. You were obviously forced out to deny you the bodyguard protection. Mafia knew I was the only other realistic one to get voted in, why would they put me under that much pressure if I was Mafia? Also super I didn't lie when I said you had never been shot, that was just my recollection. I've played 2 Town games with you IIRC, Arkham Asylum where you accomplished nothing and Kurumi's game where you actually did decently. | ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
Palmar you're the leading pusher for crying about not lynching Townies for stupid posts and instead looking for scum motivations. syllogism you've told me a million times going after sinani/Nisani for lurker behavior is scummy as fuck. Are you really convinced Nisani was a better lynch than Spaackles? | ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
It's far more likely Mafia were just lying low during that whole debacle and seeing how things played out. Mafia hate being in the spotlight. | ||
|
ProfessorBadass
94 Posts
On December 15 2011 04:49 Arctocod wrote: Given that you were afk for like the first 40 hours of the day, that appears like such an overreaction. Further, we are 95% confirmed town already so why are you attacking us instead of doing something useful. I'm not attacking you I'm asking you to go and read over the cases in a useful fashion instead of standing there making stupid statements and enabling all these dumbasses OH HERP CURU IS MAFIA BECAUSE MAFIA WOULD DEFINITELY WANT TO SACRIFICE THEIR TEAM TO GET HIM INTO OFFICE. Think for a second what possible motivation would I have as Mafia to run for office at that exact time? I wouldn't be able to use Pardoner safely till endgame and in return I get heavily watched. That's not at all worth it. I pushed so hard for it because I know my play will show myself to be Townie and I won't get shot now. I'll get to posting my thoughts later but I just woke up to people like cwave who haven't posted anything now complaining about bad wagons. Not a good morning jolt. And yeah I was afk for most of day 1. I apologize for that but I was too preoccupied with DotA 2. | ||
| ||
