TL Mafia XLVIII
|Forum Index > TL Mafia|
On December 04 2011 15:33 annul wrote:
oh snaps roles are out
Was yours in a red colour?
On December 03 2011 23:37 syllogism wrote:
On December 04 2011 18:46 syllogism wrote:
Hi Palmar, why haven't you posted yet? Pretty sure you are awake and around. What would you consider a balanced scum team with this roster?
What is this? You are asking another player for a list of players he thinks are scum based on performance in previous games, with most players having yet to post their first sentence? You are assuming the host has handpicked the mafia players?
On December 04 2011 19:49 syllogism wrote:
Incog seemed to randomize teams in PYP:I, so I definitely wouldn't lynch based on perceived balance. As for setup balance, I don't think it's useful to speculate about it given how little information I've available and how little it actually matters in terms of how we should proceed. Either way, we will likely know the answer after n1.
Well, I guess you aren't? If you were mafia, it would be advantageous for you to instigate pointless discussions that redirect players from hunting scum based on actual analysis and towards pointless lists that have been, as you have put it, seemingly randomized, and then to cover under the notion of "as for setup balance, I don't think it's useful to speculate about it".
On December 05 2011 01:14 syllogism wrote:
"Zodiac" lists are fine as a guideline for medics, especially in a game with newer players or players who are otherwise unsure as to who is a likely n1 target.
It appears you think it is safe to hide your highly suspicious suggestions behind a bush of new players. The list cannot possibly contain mafia players in it, right?
On December 05 2011 01:14 syllogism wrote:
Even if they decide against following it, it will discourage mafia from shooting into it. Given the recent success rate of TL medics, I think the main early game function of medics is to discourage mafia from being overly bold with their shots rather than to actually save someone.
What an excellent move. You are WIFOMing, right? I want to learn how to do it more efficiently.
On December 05 2011 01:34 syllogism wrote:
I'm also quite against the notion of "wifom".
Now you have totally lost me. What exactly is the point of a Zodiac list, again, according to you?
On December 04 2011 22:29 syllogism wrote:
Unfortunately I do have to have material to work with and establish my innocence. What do you think my activity implies?
On December 04 2011 23:05 syllogism wrote:
Yes, that is my main concern when posting and even a day 1 priority. I can scum hunt just fine without posting.
But... you aren't doing any of those. Instead you seem to be preoccupied with defending someone else innocence, rather adamantly I might add, this early in the game, no less.
As seen here:
On December 05 2011 02:06 syllogism wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 05 2011 02:00 prplhz wrote:
What motivation could there be for a townie to propose a no-lynch this early on day1 in a closed setup? Do you think TruthBringer is bad enough not to be able to figure this out himself?
Why do you think Palmar looks kinda scummy right now?
And what exactly is the scum motivation? Do you think they believe they can get us to nolynch by having TruthBringer propose it? Do you think they would realize what kind of reaction it would provoke?
On December 05 2011 07:39 syllogism wrote:
vaderseven: radfield is a very strong player and lynching him day 1 based on such a weak case would be ridiculous. You also did not understand what I meant when discussing strategy and related things, but I'm not going to elaborate as they are not particularly relevant. Random lynching is quite different than random voting and just a means for starting conversation. He did not suggest nolynch. Everything about your radfield notes is basically wrong
On December 05 2011 07:58 syllogism wrote:
He does not push for no lynch. Read his filter and you will discover he quotes me and agrees that no lynch is a bad idea. Even if he hadn't made that post I can guarantee you that he thinks that anyway and would not push for no lynch as scum. The post you are quoting is asking someone else's opinion on it as that's one way of extracting information; by having them voice their opinion on a potentially controversial subject.
They aren't mafia too, are they?
Instead of calling me illogical or saying my post makes no sense, can you please instead describe me your massive tattoo on your back? I would be more interested in that.
I don't lurk, ever. Nor do I plan to. Not as town, not as scum. If I don't post, it's because I can't.
Also, what kind of a pathetic death was that? I'll remember that, WBG.