EPTso can you explain why you think annul is scum and why you think palmar is scum. and why they cant be 2 townies bumping heads.
TL Mafia XLVIII - Page 78
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
so can you explain why you think annul is scum and why you think palmar is scum. and why they cant be 2 townies bumping heads. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:03 Palmar wrote: Jackal58: Can you please help me beat sense into this town. I'll gladly help you lynch Radfield later. I can't really. I don't fully agree with your case on Annul nor do I fully believe you are town. I will say I think both of you are horrible lynch targets for today. If you're really town let's not wait til later on Rad. Statements like this are scummy as hell though. On December 08 2011 23:55 Mattchew wrote: Palmar, would you go Lynch for Lynch with Annul. If he flips town you get lynched next? Do you know something about Palmar and Annuls alignments you'd like to share with us Matt? | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:07 Mattchew wrote: lol what? Please explain to me why you are actually willing to do this. Please explain to me why you actually proposed it. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:16 Palmar wrote: Mattchew is actually arguing that this would be a terrible idea, so i think he simply wanted to gauge my reactions. I actually wanted annul's reaction. I knew you would say yes lol | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:16 Mattchew wrote: I actually wanted annul's reaction. I knew you would say yes lol haha | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:16 Palmar wrote: Mattchew is actually arguing that this would be a terrible idea, so i think he simply wanted to gauge my reactions. Ya I caught up. He must be learning from you.  | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:12 Mattchew wrote: so can you explain why you think annul is scum and why you think palmar is scum. and why they cant be 2 townies bumping heads. I think he said he thinks palmar is scum and therefore annul has to be town. I am still miracously on a town-read on palmar so I got to disagree here. I think he's just an overconfident guy who hates it when he's not in controle. He screwed day1 and lost controle of this game, he started playing more serious and did a lot of lurking. He's probably stubborn enoug to tell himself something along the lines "well I'm going to show them that they SHOULD trust me and will deliver a mafia" to get back in controle / be confirmed townie so that people are listening to what he says because that's what he wants. He wants to be in charge and lead the investigation. That's why I think he might be tunneling (because he thinks he needs to find a mafia right now) and I don't think his case on annul is better than my case on erandorr. Might be wrong with my analysis of palmar though. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:18 Toadesstern wrote: I think he said he thinks palmar is scum and therefore annul has to be town. I am still miracously on a town-read on palmar so I got to disagree here. I think he's just an overconfident guy who hates it when he's not in controle. He screwed day1 and lost controle of this game, he started playing more serious and did a lot of lurking. He's probably stubborn enoug to tell himself something along the lines "well I'm going to show them that they SHOULD trust me and will deliver a mafia" to get back in controle / be confirmed townie so that people are listening to what he says because that's what he wants. He wants to be in charge and lead the investigation. That's why I think he might be tunneling (because he thinks he needs to find a mafia right now) and I don't think his case on annul is better than my case on erandorr. Might be wrong with my analysis of palmar though. Do you think he's bussing Annul? | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On December 08 2011 23:55 Mattchew wrote: Palmar, would you go Lynch for Lynch with Annul. If he flips town you get lynched next? everything you post is so hilariously scummy why are you even asking this? | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
I'm saying he's thinking higher of his case than it actually is. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:14 Jackal58 wrote: I can't really. I don't fully agree with your case on Annul nor do I fully believe you are town. I will say I think both of you are horrible lynch targets for today. If you're really town let's not wait til later on Rad. If you present a strong enough case and can convince people to kill radfield, I don't think I would oppose killing him today. My preferable target remains annul though. We need 4 more people voting for Annul to get him killed, I think. Although I'm not sure exactly how my extra vote works in that regard. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
##Vote Palmar the slowness of this wagon and the amount of protest from people like prplhz and his awful case against annul is enough. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:25 Toadesstern wrote: wat? I just said I think palmar is a stubborn townie that tries to get back in a leading position by delivering a scum. I'm saying he's thinking higher of his case than it actually is. EBWOP: That was meant to be a response to what Jackal said | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
Although I'm not sure exactly how my extra vote works in that regard. With 21 players alive, it takes 11 votes to lynch. I'd say that due to lack of a better case, and because I didn't like annul's responses so far, I'll lean towards this lynch I don't like the lynch-for-a-lynch though. Palmar and V7 are the only real town reads I have this game, probably. Which sucks really, Radfield and Toadesstern should be on that list. ##Vote annul | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:26 redFF wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote Palmar the slowness of this wagon and the amount of protest from people like prplhz and his awful case against annul is enough. Explain where the case is awful. And would you be more comfortable voting annul if the wagon was faster? I'm asking because normally I hear people throw around ideas that fast-building wagons are scummy, but now you say slow building wagons are scummy? Say, what rate would you prefer the wagon to get going at? Or did you just throw that in there to justify your vote on me? | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On December 09 2011 00:35 Palmar wrote: Explain where the case is awful. And would you be more comfortable voting annul if the wagon was faster? I'm asking because normally I hear people throw around ideas that fast-building wagons are scummy, but now you say slow building wagons are scummy? Say, what rate would you prefer the wagon to get going at? Or did you just throw that in there to justify your vote on me? The problem is that it went incredible fast early on (the first 6 votes) and stopped there for 24 hours. Do you really think 4 people are sheeping you that hard to just vote like this without an explanation? Don't you think mafia would have hoped on that wagon sometimes yesterday no matter annuls alignment? If you're really right with your case I would not want to touch annul with a pole from here to whereever he lives. If you're wrong mafia would love to get on that wagon to see a townie dead without doing a thing (that is if you're town) and would have hoped on there not right from the beginning but surely sometime. Because I can't see one of that happening I'm saying that there's already 1 or 2 mafias who hopped on that wagon from the very beginning along with some sheeping townies. | ||
| ||
