|
On December 06 2011 08:41 Refallen wrote:
As for v7 I can't see him as scum either, though I think it was retarded he immediately cc-ed dayvig without just waiting for people to defend himself from Palmar's retardedness. I'm assuming mafia can talk at day among themselves too right? Think if he was scum his buddies would probably tell him that claiming dayvig against palmar's claim is stupid. Lastly, I think there are better people to lynch, for example, Hier, for reasons aforementioned above
Traditionally, at least, mafia can talk in private during the day and night.
I have something to add to this.
I was trying to test his claim as it was my role as well. My role name is "Jack."
On December 06 2011 01:29 vaderseven wrote:
Listen Jack, you don't have to shoot me.
On December 06 2011 01:29 vaderseven wrote:
Wtf Jack=palmar
On December 06 2011 01:38 vaderseven wrote:
Thaw all you have to say about everything from the last page palmar?
On December 06 2011 01:40 vaderseven wrote:
I stand by everything I posted.
On December 06 2011 01:45 vaderseven wrote:
I now highly doubt your claim palmar. Do you stand by your claim?
I was trying to confirm his claim in a way that would help him to see my claim was true and thus have him not shot me.
|
Can we get an updated votecount asap?
Thanks and ♥ mods!
|
We are about 4 hours from the lynch right?
|
Palmar, have you considered the other way someone in my spot could have approached this?
If I had dropped the Jack name and got no reaction out of you I could have shot you right then. I considered doing that but didn't feel as good at the time about you flipping as I did soap.
If I could go back in time and help myself out, I would have done just that.
|
Ya to be very clear I will move my vote to avoid a no-lynch if needed. I will be clear about in the thread way before some 5 second type vote switch (not that I would ever or have ever done that [lol]).
|
On December 06 2011 08:58 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2011 08:57 vaderseven wrote:
Ya to be very clear I will move my vote to avoid a no-lynch if needed. I will be clear about in the thread way before some 5 second type vote switch (not that I would ever or have ever done that [lol]). we are not no lynching stop suggestion it. It is horrible in this situation
If we dont have a majority we no-lynch. I am saying that I will activly avoid that situation if I am able to apply control to it.
Palmar I reread page 25 and page 26.
On December 06 2011 01:39 Palmar wrote:
Do you stand by your dayvig claim?
On December 06 2011 01:40 vaderseven wrote:
I stand by everything I posted.
On December 06 2011 01:42 Palmar wrote:
Ok awesome. Now you have to shoot someone. May I suggest you kill Drazerk?
You do realize that with the amount of 'meta-respect' you are pulling on this forum that you have basically drawn a line in the sand there right?
Those 3 posts were back to back to back and your offer seemed way more to set me up to be "a liar" if I backed off my claim. I really should have shot you. It would have made a lot more sense.
|
From the Voting thread-
On December 06 2011 07:08 wherebugsgo wrote:You may not vote for a no-lynch, so this vote is void.
No-lynch only occurs with the lack of a majority. Every player must vote for a specific player to be lynched.
|
Jackal, can I get a link to that game and what day did that go down on?
|
On December 06 2011 09:19 Zephirdd wrote:Show nested quote +On December 06 2011 09:08 vaderseven wrote:From the Voting thread- On December 06 2011 07:08 wherebugsgo wrote:On December 06 2011 07:05 Zephirdd wrote:
##vote no-lynch You may not vote for a no-lynch, so this vote is void.
No-lynch only occurs with the lack of a majority. Every player must vote for a specific player to be lynched. "Majority" could be either "More than half" or "Most votes", depending on interpretation. Can someone clarify that, or am I just bad at English? :|
Actually your are more correct than I was in reading this. Now I want clarification. I was assuming things there based on what in my mind was the single meaning.
Good job, your English is serving you well!
|
From a sept game hosted by GMarshal:
5. This game follows Extended Majority Lynch Rules. Majority = #of players remaining in the game/2) (rounded down) + 1. Unlike in traditional majority lynch, the lynch is NOT decided the moment majority is reached. Instead, only the final vote count matters. If there is no majority at the deadline, the day ends with a no lynch. Non-voters will be modkilled for failure to vote.
So with 24 players in the game its=
24/2 = 12
12+1 = 13.
If noone has 13 or more votes there is a no lynch.
|
Nevermind not interested then.
|
By my count, Palmer leads the votes right now at 6 votes.
|
I agree with you toad that if that anon vote is missing it is basically a scum claim.
|
I think you missed my vote for palmer or crossed my name out by accident. If that is not the reason why I am not listed please let me know what formating error I did.
|
##unvote: Palmar
##Vote: Hier
I am going to go to do non mafia things but will try to check the thread before lynch. Moved my vote in case I am not back before deadline.
|
In my opinion a claimed or outer vig is an amazingly good target for night kill if believed or an unconfirmable role claim to everyone.
Your choice of calling soap homeboy mildly influenced the choice as like a small wifom chance of being scum with palmar. The main reason I choose soap was because I believe, as was kinda pointed this night, that his present Meta after the last game would make it possible for him to play the lurkiest most unhelpful scum. On the chance that he was town he was going to be just as helpful as he was last game.
The only two uses he was going to have was to be a decoy for scum and to add 1 to the town count..
I think the change of votes on heir that forced the votes of several of us onto him from Palmer was ill timed and a poor decesion.
|
If I could redo my target I would have shot palmar and I am not 100% sure why I did not.
|
Ya the fact that I have buyer's remorse over my choice of target makes me start to agree at least a bit that my action was used in haste.
|
Ya the way I see a claimed dayvig has to shoot.
|
Palmar why are you assuming anyone in their right mind would take you serious when at the time you were RNGing, trolling, and lieing?
It really bothers me that you would even suggest that your suggestion of draz was a real piece of input.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
