Steamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46)

On November 17 2011 06:56 Drazerk wrote:


I got the null void that I always get from kenpachi what exactly led you to believing he was town?

On November 17 2011 06:58 Drazerk wrote:
Lanaia one last question - Was you aware your anti vote would appear in the vote list?

On November 17 2011 07:06 Zephirdd wrote:
Kenpachi is saying a lot and defending himself a lot, but isn't giving anything conclusive. I already voted him to "pressure" him to give a good reasoning/analysis on the game(similar to Palmar's), but it's no use. The vote stands, and won't go back.

That said, I'd like to know Lanaia's reasoning for the anti-vote, and WHY to take it back right now. I believe you had a good reasoning for Kenpachi to be town this game, and I want to know it. I also believe you were not aware that the Anti-Vote would show your name. However, why take it back? Why not just explain yourself later on(when you have the time), and convince people that Kenpachi is actually town? Why just let him die like that, are you trying to remove any "connections" people made between you and him? Or did you actually change your mind and are trying to actually lynch him? (Or are you Mafia trying to save your ass by team-killing?)

It just feels scummy imo.
##Vote: Lanaia

On November 17 2011 09:36 Palmar wrote:


you're the one that needs to die, kenpachi wasn't a must, but getting rid of him is fine anyway.

and chaoser is scum, so we need to kill him.

On November 17 2011 09:42 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Stop apologising. Give us your opinion on how we should proceed with the rest of the day. Staying in the 'Kenpachi actually got lynched' mindset when we could be scum hunting is detrimental.

On November 17 2011 09:48 wherebugsgo wrote:
Also Lanaia this is really bothering me, but for whatever reason I feel inclined to use female pronouns whenever I refer to you. It's completely irrelevant to the game but unless you have a preference I'm just going to keep calling you by your name lol.

On November 17 2011 19:53 Tyrran wrote:
@Lanaia : So you did not want to claim d1, yet you used your anti-vote fully aware that he would show up?? This contradiction is the reason i still think you migth be scum.


Conclusion

Likely scum : Drazerk, Hyshes, Palmar, Hiroruby, Sinani206
Likely Town : Lanaia, LemonWalrus, GreyMisT, Zephirrd
Confirmed Town: risk.Nuke.

This is based on this analysis alone, I ignored on purpose most of the post that did not relate to the Kenpachi/lanaia Case. The goal was to find potential scum, we still need to confirm them ! I think we should not lynch anyone for now. If Kenpachi does not flip red, Focus on the likely scum above. If not, we lynched a red :D, and back to the drawing board, to re use risk.nuke wording.


What do you guys think ? I would love some feedback on this.

On November 18 2011 01:48 Sabin010 wrote:

im a native speaker and still havent figured that one out bro.

On November 18 2011 02:01 Drazerk wrote:


Probably because I am not scum and will never be lynched even if they try

On November 18 2011 10:58 wherebugsgo wrote:
In addition, Lanaia's anti-vote on him meant that we NEEDED to lynch one of them. There was no choice, we need the information. If one of them is scum the other is almost guaranteed to be scum, simply because an anti-vote on day 1 like that is incredibly scummy. Notice how Lanaia has had almost no thread presence since then. If kenpachi flips scum then this is probably why. She excused herself and said sorry and now has had no influence on town concerns at all.

On November 18 2011 23:50 Palmar wrote:
I was under the impression Lanaia has played quite a bit on globalgamers (IRC mafia) I recall something about that from PTP2. If I'm wrong, well then I'm sorry I guess.

On November 19 2011 06:43 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
Palmar, WBG, and Chaoser: Please stop shitting all over the thread with your shouting matches.

On November 19 2011 08:24 Palmar wrote:
Why are you reading the filter when you need to be reading the thread and applying context in order to legitimately find scum? The filter is fine, but whenever you find something you have to read the context the quote is said in.

On November 20 2011 05:11 GreYMisT wrote:
The phrase "guys I don't think sinani is scum, here is why..." sounds a lot more rational and thought out than STOP VOTING. All caps implies that you have to add emphasis to your wrods because they lack depth/meaning. I wouldn't be surprised if more people feel the same. Also, you didn't say "stop voting", you said "less on sinani" which forumite pointed out earlier does not adequately get you point across.

On November 22 2011 09:54 MrZentor wrote:


Sorry 'bout that.

Not that it helps any, but
##Unvote: prplhz



Really? Because I thought I made a terrible first impression.

On November 23 2011 02:30 Palmar wrote:


It's not like your astonishing contributions to the game leave you in any danger of being killed.

On November 24 2011 05:42 GreYMisT wrote:
What exactly pressured you to claim right then? to save nisani?

On November 24 2011 05:56 hyshes wrote:
btw anyone who votes for me i declare retarded (at least for this game)

On November 24 2011 06:34 Nisani201 wrote:

I would not recommend voting Coagulation. I am almost certain he is trying to draw votes to himself for whatever reason.

On November 24 2011 06:48 xsksc wrote:
Lanaia, I'm kinda curious about you. You claimed blue very early on, why are you still alive?

On November 24 2011 06:50 Palmar wrote:
Lanaia, you are not allowed to be mad at people for doing stupid stuff unless you yourself don't do stupid stuff.

On November 24 2011 23:53 xsksc wrote:
I'm also prettty suspicious of Lanaia. She says she never claimed blue, but when she blatantly anti-voted day 1 and her name appeared next to it, it's the same outcome. I'm really surprised she hasn't died yet.

On November 25 2011 01:30 xsksc wrote:


I re-read your post about the claim and I must have misunderstood it earlier. My bad, sorry.
I'm still curious that you're alive, have you been notified of any hits?

On November 25 2011 01:39 Forumite wrote:
If we assume the role works like Lanaia says (adds a negative vote, but can´t do anything once someone is hammered), the anti-voter role is usefull in the hands of a good Town player, weak in the hands of a weak Town player, and very powerfull in the hands of Scum. I don´t know if Lanaia is alive because she´s Scum or because they don´t fear her role, but I don´t think it´s surprising to see her alive still.

Lanaia, does your role do anything else except give you the option to negate another players vote on a target? Do you have any other powers?

On November 25 2011 11:57 Sabin010 wrote:
Does anybody want to do an analysis on wherebugsgo?

On November 26 2011 15:38 wherebugsgo wrote:
Lanaia you're dying tomorrow, just fyi.

On November 26 2011 16:51 wherebugsgo wrote:
scum would never shoot you.

You're one of 5 nonconfirmed players who didn't vote Coag. You're about as scummy as they get.

On November 26 2011 21:25 xsksc wrote:
Good morning.
Zona confirmed for me that if I protect 3 targets and 2 are hit, my protection on all of them fails.
Palmar and bugs, do you guys have any input on how I should use this tonight? My plan thus far has been protect the fuck out of Palmar, but it's getting a bit more complicated now.

On November 27 2011 03:00 xsksc wrote:
Yes, I must protect X or none, where X is the number we lynched. So I have to use all 3.

On November 27 2011 11:35 Zephirdd wrote:
+ Show Spoiler [Claimed Roles] +

Hmmm hyshes was unexpected. Why would Drazerk and hyshes die on different nights?
Do we have any vigilantes at all? >_>

Also, how many fucking KP do they have? Four on the same night?

Day 1 we had two shots(one killed LSB, one went to Palmar).
Day 2 we had three shots
Day 3 we had four kills.
Is it Day number +1? this is retarded to me.

Oh yeah,
##Vote Cyber_Cheese
##Vote DCLXVI

On November 04 2011 11:44 Zona wrote:
Players are advised to avoid assumptions as how the various roles have been distributed among town and mafia. Furthermore, there may be dangers in store for town players who claim their role.

On November 28 2011 03:34 Zephirdd wrote:
Because there were "hazards in store for mass lynching"

I'm pretty sure cheese and DCL are scum, so with that we will have 5 town vs 2 scum by the next night. I'll make sure Palmar or Lemon survives tomorrow night(whoever is more comfortable with getting a roleblock; I could very well protect someone else but they are my best town reads atm) and we can hope that scum don't kill us this night.

I don't want to lose because of these hazards, whichever they are. The day we lynched the most(3 players), we had the most losses(4 kills), but the day we lynched two we had only two shots; call that lab mouse logic if you want, but I'd rather calm down and go the route that provided to be the safest so far.

On November 28 2011 06:05 GreYMisT wrote:
Im ok with the two lynches we have today, but I am also convinced with sabin being scum at this point. I would like to hear everyone's thoughts on this.

On November 28 2011 06:27 GreYMisT wrote:


But do you disagree with lynching him today?

On November 29 2011 22:03 Zephirdd wrote:


I actually protected you. I thought that it would be a good idea since you don't have night actions yet you have a powerful role.

You not voting scum won't make you scum IMO; You have the counter-part for Coagulation's role, it's very unlikely that you are scum.


(Also, wtf how does a Miller knows that he is a Miller?! -_-)

Also, tomorrow we enter LYLO. I hope we don't die. I'm inclined to think that bumatlarge and Tyrran/Greymist are the mafia at this point. They are the three "vanillas"(bum never claimed).

On November 30 2011 10:48 bumatlarge wrote:
Come on broski, what have I done that is scummy? Analyze me like a man you can preserve your dignity. Countless people this game have said "Gee bum seems scummy but i dont know why". Am I not allowed to be thought of as a normal player? I have to be some crapshoot lynch you do just because I'm alive? You need to think more. I'll lay down the facts for you.

Lanaia needs to tell us exactly how many votes/anti-votes she has. 2v5 means it is going to be extremely strong even if she only has one of something left. I refuse to believe she is scum at this point and didn't straight out save her ability for the final days to instantly win in a situation tomorrow. I think she is likely to be killed over palmar tomorrow.

Lemonwalrus is scum, I don't know why but he feels scum. Oh that isn;t a good reason?

SOUND FAMILIAR?