Steamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46)

On November 13 2011 08:57 Zona wrote:

I can accommodate that. But it's best to try not to die early!

On November 13 2011 10:24 GreYMisT wrote:


QT stands for QuickTopic, its a message board that the mafia team, as well as observers and dead players, use to communicate

On November 15 2011 08:27 Zona wrote:
What time period does MLG providence span? Will you not be able to post at all during that time?

Btw I'm frantically scrambling to get the bot working with TL (lol leave things to last minute) but the game WILL start today. The bot might not go live at 9pm when the game starts but it will be functional tonight.

On November 16 2011 00:07 GreYMisT wrote:
If you are town just don't lie. It only serves to cause chaos when your lie is found as truth. While I dont nessesarily agree with LAL in all circumstances, you have to have a damn good reason for lying if you don't want to get lynched.

On November 16 2011 04:14 DCLXVI wrote:



what does this mean, you want to lynch inactive people - really? How many, how inactive, why do so? I won't accept you just "more or less agreeing" with people. That is not helpful and super scummy imo.

Now after some time has passed and more topics are brought up to discuss:


Once again a wishy washy agreement with the general consensus, but not actually taking a side. This is also allowing mafia get away with lying if we used it.



Once again you think that it is ok for townies to lie badly, we should cut them some slack? Why are you trying to allow scum to get away with occasional inconsistencies/small lies?

All Kibibit has done is to sort of agree with everyone, make excuses for potential liars, and lurk (after he says we should probably lynch lurkers.)

##Vote Kibibit

On November 16 2011 11:39 GreYMisT wrote:
WBG, you also said that we should lynch perferably 3 people today, but focus on only one target during the eairler portions. Don't you think its going to be difficult to decide when we have all decided to lynch someone, and then ignore everything they say while we work out who else to kill? While i feel the same that we should keep focused on one person per day, I think that it would better serve to keep the multi lynch in reserve unless we can all agree to use it.

On November 17 2011 05:33 chaoser wrote:


Should ask yourself first. Why would mafia want undeserved attention? And what does mafia gain from saying they're townie outright in thread? What does a townie gain from claiming townie outright in the thread just as the game starts?

Ask yourself why are people saying the main reason they want to vote me/kenpachi for saying we're townie when it's a null tell?

I don't mind getting lynched, but I'd rather kenpachi doesn't. He's pretty underrated.

Sinani is a way better lynch.

On November 17 2011 06:14 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
@Kibibit, don't edit your posts, I know you only added the vote because I saw it, but if I hadn't it could have been anything.
be VERY careful about that. Quote yourself and double/triple post if you have to, but don't edit. ever.

On November 17 2011 06:56 chaoser wrote:




So you agree it's a null tell? Nothing I said there is out of line for mafia but nothing I said there is out of lien for town either? If it's tricky to tell why are you voting to lynch me based solely around the fact that I claimed townie in thread?

On November 17 2011 10:09 wherebugsgo wrote:
##unvote chaoser
##vote Lemonwalrus

Reason:







Sorry, but I can't let away with you calling out another player for an unreasoned vote and then pulling an unreasoned vote yourself.

On November 17 2011 10:29 wherebugsgo wrote:
please elaborate on why you think a self-contradiction doesn't constitute a reason to vote somebody.

Lemon wanted chaoser to provide reasons for voting, yet voted bumatlarge with no stated reason. Even now he deflects the question by saying he intended to vote that way before. That's fine, but that's not a reason. Intent and motivation are different things, and any person with the capability to understand the two definitions should know that.

On November 18 2011 10:03 sinani206 wrote:

barely missed that 24 hour thing

On November 18 2011 10:01 GreYMisT wrote:


I agree with this policy. Even though we all have more than 2 votes out at the moment, this would definatly lessen the amount of crap we have to sift through.

I'd like to know if the people not voting sinani are doing so because they generally feel he isnt scummy, or they arnt because they dont want another lynch today.

On November 18 2011 10:09 sinani206 wrote:

- You most post in the thread at least once every 24 hours. Your role may also include other activity requirements which you must follow.

On November 23 2011 00:09 wherebugsgo wrote:


Newsflash: your instincts suck, start using logic. The faster you learn that the faster you stop being terrible.

And I mean that in general, not you specifically.

On November 23 2011 02:08 Palmar wrote:


That's wrong.

On November 24 2011 01:46 Forumite wrote:

He posted his thread before reading my post where I voted 3 of the lurkers who voted prplhz yesterday. It´s allready been answered earlier, you probably missed the post.