|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 02:34 Cyber_Cheese wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 02:30 Zephirdd wrote:On November 15 2011 23:10 Zephirdd wrote:
I'll unvote him should he provide anything useful. I guess I should be fair and say that my votes will be volatile since we can vote/unvote as much as we want.
I'll do as I said. ##Unvote: Palmar(on an unrelated note, is it okay to quote votes? For example, the host said we shouldn't vote and unvote the same person in a post, but what about quoting the vote?) Also, as I said, I agree with lynching lurkers. We shouldn't go apeshit over them, but at least one lurker should go. That said, ##Vote: KenpachiPalmar was my lurker of choice, but he already provided lots of useful discussion; Kenpachi's turn atm. I'm going to assume the answer to the questions are yes. As a choice of lurker lynch, Kenpachi over Coagulation? What?
Always kill Kenpachi - No exceptions
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
##vote: Lanaia
No blue would save kenpachi
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 06:15 Nisani201 wrote:
How experienced is chaoser? Has anyone played a game with him?
He knows what he is doing
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 06:41 Kenpachi wrote:
lol town sucks
ok I lied.
MAGIC!
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 06:44 Kenpachi wrote:
alright, tell me. Where is this day going? its going to shit. you know why? you guys are lynching me.
Fact: When town lynches a town Kenpachi, they lose. you know why? because town sucks.
Killing off inactives with lynches is just so bad. lrn2play
Multiple lynches is an anti lurker mechanic in my eyes and wasting it is pointless, unless you Actively contribute to finding scum every day I will always be voting for you.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 06:48 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 06:47 Tyrran wrote:On November 17 2011 06:45 Kenpachi wrote:On November 17 2011 06:39 Lemonwalrus wrote:On November 17 2011 06:32 risk.nuke wrote:
Okey, but isn't this exacly one of those situations where we connected two people and should not lynch both of them incase they are town.
##Vote Kenpachi That's why I only voted Lanaia, figure Lanaia flips scum, Kenpachi auto-lynch day 2, Lanaia flips town, then back to the drawing board. I felt that Lanaia was the best choice since she is either a scum or a town that used a powerful role in what I consider to be an untownly fashion, what is your reasoning for Kenpachi instead? what the fuck? Lanaia anti-voted you, if she flips scum, its an auto lynch for you, what do you not understand here ? LOL if she flips scum, it means jackshit do you not realize that?
Would you save someone with your meta?
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 06:51 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 06:50 Drazerk wrote:On November 17 2011 06:48 Kenpachi wrote:On November 17 2011 06:47 Tyrran wrote:On November 17 2011 06:45 Kenpachi wrote:On November 17 2011 06:39 Lemonwalrus wrote:On November 17 2011 06:32 risk.nuke wrote:
Okey, but isn't this exacly one of those situations where we connected two people and should not lynch both of them incase they are town.
##Vote Kenpachi That's why I only voted Lanaia, figure Lanaia flips scum, Kenpachi auto-lynch day 2, Lanaia flips town, then back to the drawing board. I felt that Lanaia was the best choice since she is either a scum or a town that used a powerful role in what I consider to be an untownly fashion, what is your reasoning for Kenpachi instead? what the fuck? Lanaia anti-voted you, if she flips scum, its an auto lynch for you, what do you not understand here ? LOL if she flips scum, it means jackshit do you not realize that? Would you save someone with your meta? NO LOL
Then why do you think Lanaia anti voted you?
And who would be more likely to protect a lurker - Scum or town?
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 06:54 Lanaia wrote:
Greymist: Yes, I do. From what I've seen of his town play in the past, I felt he was town. If I'm wrong, I'm sorry. I have to go right now, but as soon as I'm back from class (around 4 pm PST, it's nearly two now) I will try to explain more.
I got the null void that I always get from kenpachi what exactly led you to believing he was town?
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Lanaia one last question - Was you aware your anti vote would appear in the vote list?
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 06:55 Kenpachi wrote:
i can do better than that. you guys are just so demoralizing
If you don't really want to put effort into defending yourself
Who are the three most likely to be scum this game?
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 07:06 Kenpachi wrote:
very well.
gg i surrender
you win mafia
No
Your not martyring and expecting to come out alive
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 07:07 Kenpachi wrote:
"gg i surrender"
I really hope your scum -.-
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 07:09 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:09 Kenpachi wrote:
for all you know i could be doctor you derp no, i'm the doctor! (we really need a third person to do the hole Spartacus thing though)
I AM THE DOCTOR AND I SECRETLY PROTECTED EVERY SCUM IN THE GAME
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 07:11 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:11 Drazerk wrote:On November 17 2011 07:09 chaoser wrote:On November 17 2011 07:09 Kenpachi wrote:
for all you know i could be doctor you derp no, i'm the doctor! (we really need a third person to do the hole Spartacus thing though) I AM THE DOCTOR AND I SECRETLY PROTECTED EVERY SCUM IN THE GAME lol, it's funny that your protects in that game were for a mafia and then for a third-party lololol
In arkham asylum I protected the serial killer every night -.-
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 07:15 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:14 Lemonwalrus wrote:On November 17 2011 07:00 GreYMisT wrote:On November 17 2011 06:39 Lemonwalrus wrote:On November 17 2011 06:32 risk.nuke wrote:
Okey, but isn't this exacly one of those situations where we connected two people and should not lynch both of them incase they are town.
##Vote Kenpachi That's why I only voted Lanaia, figure Lanaia flips scum, Kenpachi auto-lynch day 2, Lanaia flips town, then back to the drawing board. I felt that Lanaia was the best choice since she is either a scum or a town that used a powerful role in what I consider to be an untownly fashion, what is your reasoning for Kenpachi instead? Lemon, what do you think of risk's response? On November 17 2011 06:47 risk.nuke wrote:On November 17 2011 06:34 GreYMisT wrote:On November 17 2011 06:32 risk.nuke wrote:
Okey, but isn't this exacly one of those situations where we connected two people and should not lynch both of them incase they are town.
##Vote Kenpachi perhaps, but why choose to lynch kenpachi over the guy who anti-voted him? If kenpachi is green, then lanaia probably isn't scum. If kenpachi is red we got a scumkill even if that doesn't necessarily mean lanaia is his buddy. If lanai is green that means nothing for kenpachis alignment. If lanai is red then kenpachi is scum. I think we learn more from knowing kenpachis alignment. Im starting to agree with him a bit, but in my eyes neither kenpachi or lanaia is off the hook just yet. I don't agree with risk's assessment and no longer agree with my original assessment because I can't see any scum team doing something this risky (or dumb, depending on how you want to look at it) on day 1. However, since Kenpachi has now adopted the "lol town is bad I'm not going to try anymore" mentality he is either scum or a townie that is no longer playing to win. Either way I don't want him to still be here for day 2. ##Vote: KenpachiI know that Kenpachi is capable of a lot, but if he can't offer simple explanations for what he considers to be obvious things then what is the point? oh oh vote for me too! I fall under that category!
Trying to get the only person not voting for you to vote for you? 
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 07:20 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:17 Drazerk wrote:On November 17 2011 07:15 chaoser wrote:On November 17 2011 07:14 Lemonwalrus wrote:On November 17 2011 07:00 GreYMisT wrote:On November 17 2011 06:39 Lemonwalrus wrote:On November 17 2011 06:32 risk.nuke wrote:
Okey, but isn't this exacly one of those situations where we connected two people and should not lynch both of them incase they are town.
##Vote Kenpachi That's why I only voted Lanaia, figure Lanaia flips scum, Kenpachi auto-lynch day 2, Lanaia flips town, then back to the drawing board. I felt that Lanaia was the best choice since she is either a scum or a town that used a powerful role in what I consider to be an untownly fashion, what is your reasoning for Kenpachi instead? Lemon, what do you think of risk's response? On November 17 2011 06:47 risk.nuke wrote:On November 17 2011 06:34 GreYMisT wrote:On November 17 2011 06:32 risk.nuke wrote:
Okey, but isn't this exacly one of those situations where we connected two people and should not lynch both of them incase they are town.
##Vote Kenpachi perhaps, but why choose to lynch kenpachi over the guy who anti-voted him? If kenpachi is green, then lanaia probably isn't scum. If kenpachi is red we got a scumkill even if that doesn't necessarily mean lanaia is his buddy. If lanai is green that means nothing for kenpachis alignment. If lanai is red then kenpachi is scum. I think we learn more from knowing kenpachis alignment. Im starting to agree with him a bit, but in my eyes neither kenpachi or lanaia is off the hook just yet. I don't agree with risk's assessment and no longer agree with my original assessment because I can't see any scum team doing something this risky (or dumb, depending on how you want to look at it) on day 1. However, since Kenpachi has now adopted the "lol town is bad I'm not going to try anymore" mentality he is either scum or a townie that is no longer playing to win. Either way I don't want him to still be here for day 2. ##Vote: KenpachiI know that Kenpachi is capable of a lot, but if he can't offer simple explanations for what he considers to be obvious things then what is the point? oh oh vote for me too! I fall under that category! "lol town is bad I'm not going to try anymore" mentality Trying to get the only person not voting for you to vote for you? what a scum agenda right? At all the people who love to somehow pin the "chaoser is analytically and pro and awesome y u no awesome this game with big long analytically posts??" onto me. If you think every single player is defined by one single meta and unless they play that one meta that they're scum then I'm going to be popping lots of corn when you get owned in the face by a BC/Ace led mafia team.
You've seen my meta right?
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I'm going to hold off voting on Lanaia for now. While double voting or anti-voting is certainly powerful for both scum and for town, it is a lot less useful for scum if it is prominently announced for all to see on the vote list. If Lanaia is town, presumably scum will eventually settle the issue. If Lanaia is scum, it will be hard for her to use her ability without blatantly giving things away later on. Also, unless she thought her anti-vote would be hidden, I find it hard to believe scum would be so brash on day 1.
That being said, I am going to vote for Drazerk. I said if he didn't give a good reason for his vote I'd be voting for him, and I intend to follow through on that. He seems to like trumpeting the fact that he has generally sucked as town, and overall I think his contributions have not exactly been helping to create a good town atmosphere. His repeated mentions of how much he has screwed up as town in the past combined with his plethora of 1 liners and votes with little reason behind them makes it seem like he is trying to play anti-town and get away with it because it's just his meta.
Vote: Drazerk
Now I'm going to reread the thread some and see if there is someone else I'd like to place a vote on as well.
♥
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 07:27 GreYMisT wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I'm going to hold off voting on Lanaia for now. While double voting or anti-voting is certainly powerful for both scum and for town, it is a lot less useful for scum if it is prominently announced for all to see on the vote list. If Lanaia is town, presumably scum will eventually settle the issue. If Lanaia is scum, it will be hard for her to use her ability without blatantly giving things away later on. Also, unless she thought her anti-vote would be hidden, I find it hard to believe scum would be so brash on day 1.
That being said, I am going to vote for Drazerk. I said if he didn't give a good reason for his vote I'd be voting for him, and I intend to follow through on that. He seems to like trumpeting the fact that he has generally sucked as town, and overall I think his contributions have not exactly been helping to create a good town atmosphere. His repeated mentions of how much he has screwed up as town in the past combined with his plethora of 1 liners and votes with little reason behind them makes it seem like he is trying to play anti-town and get away with it because it's just his meta.
Vote: Drazerk
Now I'm going to reread the thread some and see if there is someone else I'd like to place a vote on as well. HoD your vote is formated incorrectly, you forgot the ##. yea Lemon thats the view I hold now, but im going to wait until lanaia gets back and can explain his behavior further before I decide wether or not to unvote him. Also Drazek/Chaoser, I was Doctor Whooves in MLP mafia, and the only time i got a red check he died that night.
It's not a contest!
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 07:30 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2011 07:27 GreYMisT wrote:On November 17 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I'm going to hold off voting on Lanaia for now. While double voting or anti-voting is certainly powerful for both scum and for town, it is a lot less useful for scum if it is prominently announced for all to see on the vote list. If Lanaia is town, presumably scum will eventually settle the issue. If Lanaia is scum, it will be hard for her to use her ability without blatantly giving things away later on. Also, unless she thought her anti-vote would be hidden, I find it hard to believe scum would be so brash on day 1.
That being said, I am going to vote for Drazerk. I said if he didn't give a good reason for his vote I'd be voting for him, and I intend to follow through on that. He seems to like trumpeting the fact that he has generally sucked as town, and overall I think his contributions have not exactly been helping to create a good town atmosphere. His repeated mentions of how much he has screwed up as town in the past combined with his plethora of 1 liners and votes with little reason behind them makes it seem like he is trying to play anti-town and get away with it because it's just his meta.
Vote: Drazerk
Now I'm going to reread the thread some and see if there is someone else I'd like to place a vote on as well. HoD your vote is formated incorrectly, you forgot the ##. yea Lemon thats the view I hold now, but im going to wait until lanaia gets back and can explain his behavior further before I decide wether or not to unvote him. Also Drazek/Chaoser, I was Doctor Whooves in MLP mafia, and the only time i got a red check he died that night. Oh shit, totally didn't realize I forgot that part. Thanks for pointing that out. ##Vote: Drazerk
♥♥♥
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 17 2011 06:51 hyshes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 16 2011 21:37 Palmar wrote:
okay, prplhz, tyrran and chaoser I'll do. any reason why you didn't do tyrran?
By the way Palmar I would like to see this as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
1963
818
98
EPT
