EPTNewbie Mini Mafia - Page 31
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Drem903
United States100 Posts
| ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
|
Skrammen
Norway195 Posts
##unvote Toadesstern ##vote Chocolate | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
If there's no post from harb until 10:10 TL.net time I'm going to vote for whoever got the most because again, I have to wake up in 6 hours and a half and usually should be asleep at this point in time mondays. | ||
|
Drem903
United States100 Posts
##vote Chocolate | ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
HoD, do you think a Toad lynch is necessary? I don't like it right now, but I can vote for him if we can't get a swing going. | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
| ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
Harb better be quick. If you all lynch me for no reason I will be pretty angry. But, we will also have a good idea of who could be mafia. Over all though the lack of any reasoning from 2 people is suspicious. | ||
|
IMABUNNEH
United Kingdom1062 Posts
| ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
On November 07 2011 10:08 Chocolate wrote: K guys good reasoning you have this in the bag. Harb better be quick. If you all lynch me for no reason I will be pretty angry. But, we will also have a good idea of who could be mafia. Over all though the lack of any reasoning from 2 people is suspicious. There's some reason for it; as I've read your day 1 activity and later on, you're quite a null-tell, as you haven't been really connected to anyone else for most of the game. You haven't attacked nor defended people actively as much as others. A null-tell is one of the few things this town has to avoid now. | ||
|
Drem903
United States100 Posts
On November 07 2011 09:57 Chocolate wrote: Wait so why are you all lynching me? Because I went a little inactive? Hopefully my computer problems are fixed now, but that's not it. I am honestly curious as to why you all want to lynch me. If you all read sermo's post detailing why he wanted to lynch toad then it should make complete sense. well, you also never followed up on your promise: On November 03 2011 09:44 Chocolate wrote: Drem seems almost absolutely mafia to me. Tomorrow evening I will try to compile a list of who everyone has accused/fosd to make it easier for us to identify who the mafia are, or at least who is ignoring who. TBH drem seems suspicious because he is throwing accusations everywhere and the main people he is accusing are the ones who are after him. Yes I am very suspicious of hacklebeast, especially since he hasn't posted since the end of the last day, but I don't see much more to be suspicious of because he has only two posts of any substance. I know you keep saying you're having computer problems, but an excuse to not post doesn't really help anyone's case, and the only way to get information is through post analysis. If a person isn't posting, it becomes suspicious. You claim to have a reason, and in any other kind of thread where you were an active part of discussion this would be acceptable, but in this kind of thread you could also be a mafia who's trying to use any excuse to avoid posting and risking some kind of slip. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
Toadesstern sermokala IMABUNNEH Chocolate Drem903 xsksc Toadesstern Zanfada HarbingerOfDoom Skrammen xsksc Chocolate Skrammen Drem903 You have less than 2 hours remaining. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On November 07 2011 10:07 IMABUNNEH wrote: Bunneh will vote for Toad or SKrammen. It's on Toad atm. Ok that made the deal for me altough you changed it later on :p ##Unvote Drem903 ##Vote Chocolate A question for our lovely host: Is it possible to "attach" my vote on harbs vote? I really have to go to sleep now... Is it possible to tell you just to vote for whoever harbs voting? I'm willing to vote for everyone out of those 3 (drem, choc, skrammen) and would it be possible to count my vote as whatever he voted? :p Don't want to ruin this because of time barriers  That would be the most awesome thing ever. If he votes for someone else (like me for some reason...) I obviously have to stick with my normal vote. If that's not possible (don't think you're willing to do that but I have to ask^^) just stick with what I voted | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
On November 07 2011 10:13 Drem903 wrote: well, you also never followed up on your promise: I know you keep saying you're having computer problems, but an excuse to not post doesn't really help anyone's case, and the only way to get information is through post analysis. If a person isn't posting, it becomes suspicious. You claim to have a reason, and in any other kind of thread where you were an active part of discussion this would be acceptable, but in this kind of thread you could also be a mafia who's trying to use any excuse to avoid posting and risking some kind of slip. Ok those are actually some good reasons. First, I couldn't follow up on my promise because I ran out of time and found out I had school work to do, and frankly I was too lazy to actually do that. sermokala did it quite well, however. Second, I haven't posted a bunch because I don't know what to say because this is my first game and there is little hard evidence from anyone i.e. there is no certain tell that we can use to find the other scum. Many of my posts were filler because I wanted to be active, and some of them were to avoid confusion. Ultimately these are pretty good reasons, but it will still be a mistake to lynch me. I understand if you do though. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On October 24 2011 00:35 kitaman27 wrote: Voting rules: 3. No conditional voting. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
But okay that's my last post for today, I'm offline now really have to go. I think harbs fine with a vote on choc since he asked for him first and I am still kind of scared to vote for skrammen. So I won't be able to change my vote anymore guys! Make sure you get this vote and see you tomorrow! | ||
|
Ciryandor
United States3735 Posts
Well, we need two votes on this one, but I'm suspicious as fuck on the jumpers being Skrammen and Drem. I can still change my vote to force a lynch because it's morning here and I'm going to an SC2 tourney later after the deadline clears. | ||
|
Drem903
United States100 Posts
On November 07 2011 10:27 Ciryandor wrote: ## Vote Chocolate Well, we need two votes on this one, but I'm suspicious as fuck on the jumpers being Skrammen and Drem. I can still change my vote to force a lynch because it's morning here and I'm going to an SC2 tourney later after the deadline clears. Well, the options stand at Sk, Chocolate, myself, and toad. You and Har probably have the biggest influence on who gets lynched, and could probably get people on to whoever you want. I'm not really a jumper as i didn't really want to vote for toad in the first place, but i just didn't have the swing to pull people to a chocolate or SK vote, and toad was the only other person possible. If i had voted randomly for someone else and the vote had ended up a draw (not enough for either toad or myself) then i would have been even more screwed. I had already blocked the day 1 lynch, and blocking the day 3 lynch would've just gotten my killed day 4. I wouldn't be able to talk myself out of it, i would be lynched. So my only hope was to vote for toad and have him turn up mafia. I'm still in the same position. If chocolate turns out town, then i still die, but chocolate is the person that i'm most confident in. | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
##unvote Drem903 ##vote Chocolate | ||
| ||
