|
On September 28 2011 00:58 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 00:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 00:52 Drazerk wrote:
Rayn -
I protected chaoser because I think he's lying about being bulletproof - I even said that the day he claimed. I already explained that I lied about finding the role blocker so Mafia would kill me last night. I didn't know I would survive today and to be honest it would of been better had they killed me. I did my job last night and ill be role blocked tonight so you idiots can lynch me tomorrow. How do you explain the mafia hit on prplhz when you clearly stated you are protecting him last night? And the fact that you know it was a double hit? These both together makes you look so scummy i can't even explain. medics are clearly told that they protected their target from a hit the previous night. If it was unblockable I wouldn't of gotten that message. It is as simple as that. also I don't think mafia are stupid enough to hit SS and I can probably guess that they hit me unless a vigilante wants to own up to it.
I didn't ask how did you find out that prp was double hit, i want know how are you able to explain it, unless you didn't actually protect him. Would you as mafia hit a guy who is basically claimed bulletproof next night, just becouse you hope it's gonna be a double stack?
|
And the fact that you know it was a double hit?
I didn't ask how did you find out that prp was double hit
Clearly you DID ask it...
|
And becouse you claimed you 100% know it was a double hit, we actually know it was a double hit (or you are lying about protecting him). Anyways it doesn't make sense.
|
[QUOTE]On September 28 2011 01:06 chaoser wrote:
[quote]And the fact that you know it was a double hit?[/quote]
[quote]I didn't ask how did you find out that prp was double hit[/quote]
Clearly you DID ask it...[/QUOTE]
Actually that wasn't supposed to be a question marks there. :D
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On September 28 2011 01:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 00:58 Drazerk wrote:On September 28 2011 00:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 00:52 Drazerk wrote:
Rayn -
I protected chaoser because I think he's lying about being bulletproof - I even said that the day he claimed. I already explained that I lied about finding the role blocker so Mafia would kill me last night. I didn't know I would survive today and to be honest it would of been better had they killed me. I did my job last night and ill be role blocked tonight so you idiots can lynch me tomorrow. How do you explain the mafia hit on prplhz when you clearly stated you are protecting him last night? And the fact that you know it was a double hit? These both together makes you look so scummy i can't even explain. medics are clearly told that they protected their target from a hit the previous night. If it was unblockable I wouldn't of gotten that message. It is as simple as that. also I don't think mafia are stupid enough to hit SS and I can probably guess that they hit me unless a vigilante wants to own up to it. I didn't ask how did you find out that prp was double hit, i want know how are you able to explain it, unless you didn't actually protect him. Would you as mafia hit a guy who is basically claimed bulletproof next night, just becouse you hope it's gonna be a double stack?
He didn't claim bulletproof all he had was me saying I was going to protect him which I could of been lying about.
It makes all the sense to hit him and steal the ring from him to power them selves up.
|
Okay, I try to be as clear as possible.
Facts:
1) You stated youre gonna protect prp at night (by bulletproof i meant that he was able to survive 1 hit becouse you told us so).
2) prp was still killed
3) it was a double hit (you stated it as a first one)
Then:
Why would mafia hit a guy who they know you are gonna protect and not RB you? I could think gollum would still hit him becouse of the reasons i've stated before (and "was strangled" is nearly 100% gollum kill).
Are you saying mafia gambled if gollum is gonna hit prp too? Or are you saying mafia double hitted prp? Or are you lying?
|
For all of you: Why would mafia hit prp and not RB Drazerk, when it's clear Drazerk is gonna protect him? Quite a gamble i say... or Drazerk is scum!
|
On September 26 2011 09:23 heist wrote:
Seriously rayn? Get your vote off him and do some actual searching.
Do you still agree with your statement heist?
|
Chaoser hit Prp, the flavor is the same for radfield's death.
|
|
|
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
|
List of people you're allowed to lynch:
Kitaman (Mafia)
Chaoser (SK)
obviously we should just kill kitaman, as chaoser can be lynched as soon as he has a bad shot.
|
On September 28 2011 01:28 GreYMisT wrote:
Chaoser hit Prp, the flavor is the same for radfield's death.
I meant the night prp died.
|
On September 28 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote:
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
Mafia claiming has been senseless througout the game already.
How would you explain the fact that Drazerk protected prplhz, was not RB, and still there was a mafia hit on prp?
|
On September 28 2011 01:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote:
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
Mafia claiming has been senseless througout the game already. How would you explain the fact that Drazerk protected prplhz, was not RB, and still there was a mafia hit on prp?
When I say shit, you listen.
Drazerk is clear, Kita is scum.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On September 28 2011 01:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote:
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
Mafia claiming has been senseless througout the game already. How would you explain the fact that Drazerk protected prplhz, was not RB, and still there was a mafia hit on prp?
I wasn't role blocked because they tried to kill me ( They failed thanks to the second medic ) and they role blocked chaoser who was going to kill one of them last night and possibly reduce them a KP.
|
On September 28 2011 01:37 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 01:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote:
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
Mafia claiming has been senseless througout the game already. How would you explain the fact that Drazerk protected prplhz, was not RB, and still there was a mafia hit on prp? When I say shit, you listen. Drazerk is clear, Kita is scum.
That's what i call a conversation.
|
On September 28 2011 01:38 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 01:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote:
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
Mafia claiming has been senseless througout the game already. How would you explain the fact that Drazerk protected prplhz, was not RB, and still there was a mafia hit on prp? I wasn't role blocked because they tried to kill me ( They failed thanks to the second medic ) and they role blocked chaoser who was going to kill one of them last night and possibly reduce them a KP.
To be more clear, why would mafia hit prplhz when they clearly know you are going to protect him, and they clearly know you are not going to be roleblocked?
Could you answer to the actual question please?
|
|
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On September 28 2011 01:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2011 01:38 Drazerk wrote:On September 28 2011 01:35 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 28 2011 01:28 Palmar wrote:
it makes no sense for mafia to claim what drazerk has claimed. If he was actually mafia he could've just said he protected me (I got iGrok lyncheD), chaoser (could be a vigi, although he's an SK), or Kita (claimed tracker).
Drazerkery is not scum, he's bad, but not scum.
Mafia claiming has been senseless througout the game already. How would you explain the fact that Drazerk protected prplhz, was not RB, and still there was a mafia hit on prp? I wasn't role blocked because they tried to kill me ( They failed thanks to the second medic ) and they role blocked chaoser who was going to kill one of them last night and possibly reduce them a KP. To be more clear, why would mafia hit prplhz when they clearly know you are going to protect him, and they clearly know you are not going to be roleblocked?Could you answer to the actual question please?
They didn't know I was going to protect him... lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
