My Little Pony Mafia

On September 08 2011 07:53 Forumite wrote:
Fishing for pony fanservice?

On September 08 2011 14:26 Sevryn wrote:

##vote sinani206
Clearly jealous

On September 12 2011 10:44 GreYMisT wrote:
Mine is Doctor whooves(see below quote) but as far as main characters go, Rainbow dash is my favorite

On September 13 2011 02:12 Forumite wrote:
Lucidity, dreamflower and wherebugsgo are the only ones I haven´t played a game with (WBG died immediately after joining as a replacement, so he doesn´t count).

Have you played a lot of Mafia?

On September 13 2011 10:58 chaos13 wrote:


So in other words you think he warrants a check because he has an equally good chance at being mafia as any other random person selected from the player list?

On September 13 2011 10:13 Forumite wrote:


Personally, I don´t want to lynch lurkers or Jackal. Lynching Jackal for the fun of it is a mistake. Checking the last games, he´s often dead after the second night, mostly after he rolls Town and gets lynched anyway. He could be scum (Like in the CH game ), but I´m not wasting time pushing to lynch him until he´s shown some real scumtells. Jackal does warrant a cop check though, if we have a detective out there.

On September 13 2011 11:22 Nisani201 wrote:

I think you're taking this too far.

On September 13 2011 11:22 Forumite wrote:

Of course we don´t want him to claim immediately, but he can breadcrumb, or wait a few days and claim when there´s more info. If Jackal´s scum, then we know when the DT claims or dies, and can lynch then. The only way this would not work is if Jackal is Scum AND there is no DT, or if the DT ignore this plan and checks someone else.

On September 14 2011 01:37 Sevryn wrote:

That gets rid of the pressure. "O hey im going to vote for you now but its not for real so dont worry you can keep lurking."

On September 14 2011 00:33 Nisani201 wrote:
We don't intend to lynch the lurkers. We plan to pressure them.

On September 14 2011 01:10 GreYMisT wrote:
Lurking is obviously pretty bad for the town, as is being inactive. I feel, however, that we need to go after real targets as a priority even on day 1. Scum can use this lynch inactives policy to shunt lynches away from themselves, and we don't want that to bite us later on. Lynching real targets before lurkers will also give us more information. I will post some analysis when I am out of bio lab in about 3 hours.

On September 14 2011 01:44 Jackal58 wrote:

I think lynching them is an excellent idea. I'm also realistic and understand it never fucking happens.
And then in 3 days when all the active players are dead we get to listen to you cry, whine and complain about a game full of lurkers. But it's all good man. I plan on being dead by then anyways.

On September 14 2011 02:23 dreamflower wrote:


Ah, true. Yes, I was referring to lurkers when I said inactives. My apologies. A lot of my thinking still dates back to the olden days before inactivity modkills or the Ban List, so please excuse me if I phrase things oddly like that.

I also agree about OriginalName, whom I'm a little annoyed about not noticing myself. I also noticed that DroneAllDay's statement of Mafia newness came very soon after he signed up and long before roles were sent out, so that pretty much rules out his being a Mafia trying to masquerade as a newbie. My mistake there. OriginalName's one contribution to the thread after the Day post has been to call Forumite's post "a huge pile of fluff," but after that he hasn't said anything else at all. That does look more like lurking than outright inactivity.
.

On September 14 2011 02:23 dreamflower wrote:
To add my own opinion on the merits of lynching lurkers, I think it is a good idea early on, when we don't have much information to work with. I agree that lynching lurkers doesn't yield much information afterward, but I don't think going after "real" targets always does either. The people who argue for a townie to be lynched or vote for their lynch are not necessarily Mafia themselves. So, I don't think either approach can give us much in the way of useful information

On September 14 2011 03:46 tnkted wrote:
Yeah, I'm backing off greymyst for now, his defence wasn't convincing but the manner of it has mollified me for now.

I'll hop on the originalname bandwagon until he perks his pony little head up.

## Unvote

## Vote OriginalName


Also, do these smaller games not have voting threads? Are voting threads going away?

On September 14 2011 04:46 tnkted wrote:
Why would you give the noob some lattitude? This is how they learn: they get lynched d1 as town for lurking after they were pressured.

On September 14 2011 04:47 dreamflower wrote:


So, yes to the above post. No one right now is jumping out at me as being active and scummy, so I would prefer lynching a lurker this early in the game.

On September 14 2011 04:59 tnkted wrote:
Uh, what? Did you even read my post?



And as for contributing jack shit: I posted a small little analysis on Greymyst, he responded to my FoS and I'm satisfied with the way he responded. If you don't think that's enough contribution for day one, too fucking bad. I have a life, you know.

On September 14 2011 11:16 sinani206 wrote:

This is a pressure vote, to prompt an answer to my question, "Why lynch a lurker if we have a perfectly good other lynch candidate?"

I don't understand why other people can pressure vote me, but I can't pressure vote others.

On September 14 2011 11:49 Nisani201 wrote:

I don't think you should be able to tell anyone's alignment this early in the game.

On September 14 2011 11:58 tnkted wrote:
Er, yeah, Curu, we can't lynch him because YOU SAY he will be bad for town atmosphere. I'm not really convinced you know what you're talking about.

On September 14 2011 04:46 tnkted wrote:
Why would you give the noob some lattitude? This is how they learn: they get lynched d1 as town for lurking after they were pressured.

On September 14 2011 10:30 sinani206 wrote:
##Vote: dreamflower for even bringing up the subject of lynching a lurker.

On September 14 2011 13:32 Curu wrote:
WBG you seem to agree with me on sinani (you were in that game too) but how come your vote never moved?

On September 15 2011 02:52 Nisani201 wrote:
I am going to Unvote: Curu. I feel like we were all just arguing while scum watched and laughed. IMO there would have been more people in the conversation if one of us were scum.

I will move my vote over to wherebugsgo, because he was perfectly active until we started arguing. He has posted no opinions on it because he doesn't feel the need to; he can afford for any of us to die. He simply comments on the same things that Curu has been bringing up, which is "Sinani played horribly in Ace's game, so we should lynch him."

##Vote: wherebugsgo

On September 15 2011 00:57 Nisani201 wrote:
Also, I might not be as active during this portion of day becauSBe Minecraft 1.8 is out, and I will probably have a lot of homework.

On September 15 2011 07:13 Nisani201 wrote:
Majority lynch is weird. I don't like it. However, GreYMisT is right, I shouldn't be voting for an outlier.

##Unvote

##Vote: Curu

If anyone else is interested in lynching wherebugsgo, just post it here, and maybe I can get some more votes on him.

On September 14 2011 13:24 Nisani201 wrote:

I already stated in the thread that I only intended to lynch lurkers if they ended up not posting. (however I will admit that this was poorly thought out, because he would be eligible for modkill anyways). I prefered voting for DroneAllDay rather than Sinani because Sinani has not done anything scummy. The case against Forumite is not good enough to warrant a vote. And then you come around, calling everyone scum, and make yourself the perfect target for my vote. EZ.

On September 14 2011 22:04 tnkted wrote:



Fair enough, You certainly haven't been lurking.

##Unvote

My thoughts on DroneAllDay: I don't think he's posted since the day started, which means he's probably going to get modkilled. Perhaps he hasn't checked his pms in awhile? Either way, I think he's going to get himself dead without anybody's help (@Dreamflower: This is one of the main reasons NOT to lynch lurkers; they tend to get themselves modkilled anyway and we waste a lynch).

My thoughts on lucidity: his post analyzing dreamflower was extremely interesting because it was well done. I don't know if I agree with his conclusions, but his method was very effective: It paraphrased the important aspects of dreamflower's post, and interpreted them in order to understand what dreamflower was really talking about. THIS is a good way to find scum.

Now, why he chose dreamflower and nobody else is kind of interesting; Dreamflowers scumhunting abilities are so legendary (for me anyway) that I have a hard time believing she intended to come across as scummy as she did. I want to hear her response before I vote for her. Also interesting to note is that lucidity didn't actually vote her himself; he's also waiting for a response. For what it's worth, right now dreamflower is my #1 vote but I'll abstain until she shows up to defend herself.

Eh, what the hell. I can always change it later.

##Vote: Dreamflower

I have no self control.

Now, to deal with some mindless accusations:




Frankly, this is a complete nonsense post. "Tnkted makes a good point about forumite not being scum, which convinced me, but later, i changed my mind and now I think he's scum too!" WHY did you change your mind when what I said made sense to you? Go find me evidence where he stopped acting like an annoyed townie and more like a frightened scum, and I'll consider switching to you.

Please post a case against me instead of just throwing out soft foses. You think people don't notice when you do this?

On September 15 2011 08:10 Jackal58 wrote:
Dreamflower is the only person that has made any sense in this game yet.

##UNVOTE: Chaos13
##VOTE: sinani206

On September 15 2011 08:40 Lucidity wrote:
Can everypony stop with the name calling? There's no need to be rude.

I think tnkted is a great choice, but is his lynch a realistic possibility? I won't be here for the lynch so I feel safer leaving my vote on sinani.

WBG: In what world could sinani and Curu both be scum?

Finally, there are a few other players who I found made interesting remarks today, and who I think we should keep an eye on. Sinani and Curu for obvious reasons, but I have an inkling at least one of them is town.

On September 15 2011 08:47 Forumite wrote:
When is the deadline?

WBG, I understand that tnkted is a likely scum, but he won´t be lynched today. Your vote is wasted on tnkted, or worse, the reason we get a no-lynch.

On September 15 2011 08:55 Jackal58 wrote:

Sinani and Nisani are linked at the hip. You have both of them on your watch list. We have 2 or a little more than hours left. We are currently headed towards a non lynch. And you want to switch it? And if you and Curu continue to call every swinging dick in the game names with every post I'm gonna opt out of every game you guys join. If you get this emotionally vested into a text based forum game I would suggest some counseling.

On September 15 2011 08:47 Forumite wrote:
When is the deadline?

WBG, I understand that tnkted is a likely scum, but he won´t be lynched today. Your vote is wasted on tnkted, or worse, the reason we get a no-lynch.

On September 15 2011 09:13 Jackal58 wrote:

No matter how he flips we have info from the voting.

On September 15 2011 09:32 Forumite wrote:

Assuming 3 scum, then there are plenty of players to form a bandwagon without scum.

On September 15 2011 11:02 sinani206 wrote:
lol i think i might win an award for most deaths as town day 1

On September 15 2011 10:34 DroneAllDay wrote:
well damn I decided to read the thread more (I'll be honest, i skimmed cuz i was afraid the vote was coming soon and I figured that i needed to vote then) filtering Curu's posts and not looking at them at 6:30 A.M. well that vote was how you say really REALLY+ Show Spoiler + dumb Sorry about that, thankfully my classes are gonna be lighter for now so I won't be doing this again. So with that, reading(NOTE: NOT SKIMMING) this time Nisani has too many posts with too little content (some of nothing useful and others of agreement)











and wherebugsgo found this which I find interesting


and so with that



##UNVOTE
##Vote:Nisani201

On September 16 2011 02:09 dreamflower wrote:
By the way, wherebugsgo, can you restate your case against tntked again, please? I went back over your posts, and it seemed like you were accusing him of wishy-washiness and sheeping Lucidity at one point. Is that about right? I just want to be clear on why you wanted to lynch him last night.

On September 15 2011 23:31 dreamflower wrote:
Oh, oops, I missed the exchange between wherebugsgo and Forumite, where Forumite asks him, "Why not switch your vote? Tnkted isn't going to get lynched anyway" and wherebugsgo complies. So, I guess it isn't true that no one was forcing him to vote for sinani. It is still a dramatic shift from saying "I don't think sinani is scum and I'm not gonna vote for him" to "I'm prepared to switch my vote, but I don't think sinani is the best lynch," to "We only have 6 votes on sinani? ##vote sinani" in about as many posts.

I guess some of this can be attributed to the frustration of anticipating a no-lynch to happen. But it's still weird that wherebugsgo keeps saying that he thinks sinani isn't Mafia and he's never seen a bandwagon form this quickly for a real Mafia, but jumps on the bandwagon anyway and casts the deciding vote against sinani.

On September 16 2011 02:09 dreamflower wrote:
It's not that I believe a no-lynch is a viable option, except possibly in some endgame situation, which we certainly are not in right now. But I couldn't help but be surprised that the no-lynch didn't happen last night, due to the vote of someone who made it clear that he believed the person he was voting for wasn't Mafia, no less. For my part, I wouldn't have blamed wherebugsgo specifically as the cause for the no-lynch. I definitely wouldn't have insta-voted him the next day over it. There were plenty of people who were also posting at the time who could have changed their vote, like Nisani or DroneAllDay with his weird filter-ish accusation of Nisani (what was that, by the way? DroneAllDay, are you really accusing someone because of posts they made before the game started?), and didn't. If we'd had a no-lynch, it would have been because of several people who voted for players other than sinani206, not just because of wherebugsgo.

I guess it really would have been frustrating to not have a lynch happen last night, though. Considering how starved we are for information, I can't fault you for that. Sorry for the "hammer," wherebugsgo; I just thought the change of heart was really striking at first, though it is understandable.

On September 16 2011 19:44 Jackal58 wrote:
Twinkles is town. Guaranteed.

On September 17 2011 05:38 tnkted wrote:
Just tell them jackal, the info is pro-town and if you're killed it confirms my alignment anyway which mafia does not want. Vice versa if you're killed.

On September 17 2011 11:11 GreYMisT wrote:


I think this lowers their suspicion level to me. here is why:

Note when Jackal posted his assertion that tntked was town for the first time. Before the night post. Before that point a lot of us were talking about tntked and his behavior the previous day. The best reason I can see of this is that jackal thought the chances were good that he was going to die that night, so he posted information he had somehow obtain that tntked was town, in hopes that his death, flipping green/blue, and his post would prevent another mislynch on tntked today. The more complicated explination is that he is mafia, he fabricates a post about his scumbuddie tntked being town, and posts it in hopes the above argument is assumed, and a vig doesnt hit him or tnkted making him look guilty, or tntked isnt lynched anyway, exposing jackal as a liar, and now the scum is down by 2. I do not see any senario that would occur if only one of tntked or jackal was scum. in my eyes both have to either be town, or scum. Occam's Razor dictates that the first senario (with them both being town) is more simple, and therefore more likely. However, I await your explanation as to what in the hell is going on.

On September 17 2011 14:13 Jackal58 wrote:

Scum really hate when two townies know they are both townies don't you?
Scum really hate when townies have knowledge that is denied to scum don't you?

PM abilities in a non PM game are great. As I said before if you guys feel compelled to lynch me to verify my alignment I'm ok with that. But keep your dick beaters off of Twinkles.

Sorry Curu. I didn't realize you were running LOTR when I posted that.

My vote is going on Bugs. If you're town you can trust me or lynch me. But you damn sure aren't getting all the details.

##VOTE: wherebugsgo

On September 17 2011 14:41 Jackal58 wrote:

I have been completely honest. All you need to know right now is tnkted is town.

On September 17 2011 14:38 wherebugsgo wrote:
I don't have PM ability, but I think I understand what's going on.

Let's be...honest about it.

On September 18 2011 07:04 Lucidity wrote:
Just read the new element of harmony claim. One of Forumite or WBG is definitely scum.

On September 18 2011 20:36 Forumite wrote:
You really should have checked that earlier, but whatever. So either you are scum and got it after nightkilling Chaos13, Chaos13 sent it to you right before dying (except he couldn´t have known that he would die), or you got it randomly after the holder died. We don´t know the exact mechanic of the pieces of Harmony, so I´m inclined to leave it at that, until tnkted gets back to us with wether or not he got the pieces. It´s up to what tnkted has got now.

As for Nisani201, he´s the only thing confirming that I got my piece by day 1, before he came out with that, risking his own neck and claiming to me and Curu that he´s in our PM circle, then I was the one who looked like the lyer, since I got my piece before anyone else. I had allready claimed, so if he was scum wanting to destroy our Mason Circle, he could have just waited and nightkilled me instead. More or less the same for Curu, he risked himself too, and didn´t really gain anything from it, except calling himself in the open. Sure, Nisani and Curu are not 100% confirmed Town, but they act like Town. Good enough for me, so I´m not going to be party to a lynch on them.

On September 18 2011 12:23 Forumite wrote:
Okay, assuming that WBG does what he should and sends his to tnkted, this is where I think scum lurks:

1.) dreamflower
2.) Sevryn
3.) Lucidity
5.) GreYMisT
6.) DroneAllDay replaced by Cyber_Cheese

On September 19 2011 08:07 Lucidity wrote:


Erm?

And nice work on the false dilemma. The alternative is LYNCHING SCUM IN WBG. Not a no lynch.


And riddle me this: Why did WBG vote for both you and Jackal at a stage that he claims he believed you were town? Please read the part of my analysis on WBG that deals with you and the claims at least.

And comment on it.

Why am I more scummy than WBG? Everyone that votes for me needs to state this clearly so that we can find the scum on me after I die.

@Everyone: I haven't played with tnkted before. Is he considered a good player?

On September 19 2011 07:01 Lucidity wrote:
He might have thought that him getting it Day 2 ties in with Chaos dying. He might have wanted to remove that possibility from the table completely. If he had said Day 2 I would have immediately brought up the idea that scum get the elements of their night kill victims. So that was smart of him.

The first time he "breadcrumbs" that he has the element is after tnkted/jackal on Day 2.

Come. On.

On September 19 2011 08:51 Forumite wrote:

Lucidity explained all the points against you. Claiming you got your item N1 to conform with tnkted+Jackal, changing your mind once Nisani confirmed my claim on a D1 item, heavily pushing for Jackal to confess when you should have figured it out allready. If we ignore the fact that you gave up your piece, then you look more scummy than Lucidity.

On September 19 2011 08:55 Forumite wrote:

He was reluctant to accept me as a possible holder, not wanting to give up his piece before leaving for a long while, only doing it after I gave up mine and thereby forced him to do the same. It might as well have been a scum gambit, with all the trouble we went through to get that piece.

On September 19 2011 08:55 Jackal58 wrote:

Would you please refrain from this? If I want to listen to somebody call others stupid all night I'll go watch tv with my wife.

On September 19 2011 08:58 Forumite wrote:

It is probably a mistake, but at the time it made me look bad, and it took until Nisani vouched for me before you rechecked, before then I was risking a lynch. It doesn´t matter if it was a mistake or not, what happened fit what a scum would do in order to get me lynched, or maybe trick me into sending you my piece before then. We can´t verify the truth behind it, and it looks bad.

On September 19 2011 09:02 Forumite wrote:

I tried to resolve the issue before you had to go, I even suggested sending to Jackal. Waiting would just delay needlessly, and cut 4 hours out of that day, because we focused on the elements and the holders instead of scumhunting. It´s not that you went away that looks bad, but that you stalled until you had to go.

On September 19 2011 09:04 Forumite wrote:

If you were scum, then it would have been a good way to get an element for Scum, lynch a Townie, at worst at the cost of your life the day after.

On September 19 2011 09:34 Forumite wrote:


A piece does you no good, but if you could get me to send you the other piece, and at the same time get me killed, then it´s 3 town down and an element in Scum hands, in return for your life. Before I sent to tnkted, you were never forced to do the same, and with some persuasion, perhaps I would have sent mine to you without any fuzz. After that, you could have said you hadn´t gotten a piece, and I would have been lynched as a liar. If it wasn´t for Nisani, my breadcrumbs, and tnkted, that could have been a possibility.

I don´t have any proof that this would have happened, but it could have happened, if it was anyone else who didn´t breadcrumb or had a Cutie Mark Crusader buddy.

And no, I don´t think WBG is scum, just exploring the possibilities here. He could be scum, that´s what I wanted to check. Lucidity, arguing with him makes him look Town to me, despite pushing for WBG. He´s explained what he was up to, and his reasons are not scummy. If he´s scum, then it´s because he´s pushing on someone we want to have confirmed, not because of the way he´s pushing.

On September 19 2011 10:01 Forumite wrote:

I´m not proving your guilt, just the possibility of guilt, and while it´s convoluted logic, it paints a logical train of thought both from a scum and town perspective. You didn´t have to tell me to give you my piece, it was always on the table, and always one of the ways to clear up the situation. I repeatedly asked you to make up your mind about giving your piece to me. You could have said that you didn´t trust me, that I should give you my piece. I was waiting for an answer, on if I would get the piece or if I should give mine away, because I felt a lynch coming on. Before Nisani vouched for me, there was enough pressure that I might have given you the piece just to keep it among living ponies. It could have worked, and that you didn´t say you wanted the piece doesn´t mean anything, because it was always the most likely outcome, thanks to your mistake with the PM.

On September 19 2011 10:02 Jackal58 wrote:

What would you do? I mean if you were scum. Say all 5 of us posting now are town. Would you post anything?

On September 19 2011 10:05 Forumite wrote:

We stopped voting for Nisani after he cleared me of suspicion about me getting my element early.

I think Lucidity was suspicious about WBG before he came under suspicion, and since he´s been defending the case that I thought it was scummy of him to make, not trying to make a case to divert attention.

On September 19 2011 10:31 Forumite wrote:

WBG can´t accept that what he did could have been done exactly the same by a scum, which is weird, but since the element claims and until now, I feel we can make do without a lynch today. If everyone wants to lynch WBG, then I can move my vote, I won´t force a no-lynch.

On September 19 2011 10:36 Forumite wrote:

You might be Town, but I´ve proven that it´s not proven that you are Town. See?

On September 19 2011 10:41 Jackal58 wrote:

There aren't enough votes.

On September 19 2011 10:46 Jackal58 wrote:

One of them is Nisani.

On September 19 2011 10:43 Forumite wrote:

Actually, almost everything you did after tnkted and Jackals claims until you gave over the piece to tnkted has looked like suspicious to me. That´s why I didn´t send you my piece earlier, because you acted weird. I disregarded it due to the final result, you giving up the piece, but by that time you didn´t have a choice, so it doesn´t mean much.

On September 19 2011 10:52 GreYMisT wrote:
So we have a choice, No-lynch or WBG.
The problem with a no-lynch is we pretty much get to do today all over again, but with the absence of a town member due to nighttime. Of course, if some blues come forth with info on day3 that would be great, but not likely. On the other hand killing a townie just for the sake of killing someone is not a good idea, and if we all feel pretty good about WBG being town we shouldn't kill him.
What do you guys think about a no-lynch

On September 19 2011 19:30 Lucidity wrote:

You forgot scenario #4. tnkted is scum and Jackal is town. I think out of #3 and #4, #4 is more likely. tnkted had made no mention about his element or that he gave it to Jackal in the thread. Jackal could have easily killed him if he were red. I think #3 can almost be completely disregarded.

#4 however makes sense if we consider that tnkted was the first in line to be lynched on Day 2. Doing what he did saved his skin on Day 2, there's no doubt about that.

If we're going to lynch someone to confirm a townie, it should be tnkted to confirm Jackal, not the other way around. Lynching Jackal doesn't confirm anything. But we shouldn't be lynching to confirm anyone anyway. Please stop suggesting that o; The info we gain should be a byproduct of us hunting scum.

I'm done with assuming tnkted is town. For most of Day 2 I assumed that his play was that of a Townie making mistakes. I'm not going to be giving him that leeway anymore. I went in to Day 2 believing he was scummy. His actions during the lynch saga between me and WBG were scummy. I'll have a closer look at it today.

WBG: How did you forget when you got the element? I can't fathom how such a thing could ever happen. Please try to make me understand it.

At anyone who pushed for a no lynch who is actually town: You suck.

At inactive replacements who turn out to be inactive themselves............ You suck.

On September 20 2011 05:59 Nisani201 wrote:

I explained in thread why I wasn't around yesterday. And lurkers aren't killing the game, the no-lynch that YOU CAUSED is killing this game.

On September 20 2011 09:06 Jackal58 wrote:

I sure don't see it. I see you getting pissy about proving to Forumite you were in the QT but you never explained why you thought he was scum.
While you're here (Unless you're going away for another 30 hours) did Forumite mention getting a strange PM in the QT?

On September 20 2011 09:12 Jackal58 wrote:
Hey Bugs? If you're town why aren't you playing scummy?

On September 20 2011 09:14 Curu wrote:
I don't think Nisani is scum. It's probably Forumite. Nisani has bad posting but it doesn't seem to align with Mafia objectives.

On September 20 2011 09:17 Erandorr wrote:


that really made me giggle after lotr :D

On September 20 2011 09:22 Nisani201 wrote:

The only person I blame for the no-lynch is you.

On September 20 2011 01:39 Nisani201 wrote:
Ok, what the fuck? How did we get a no-lynch?

I'm on my iPod right now so I can't navigate as quickly, but I am putting big FoS on the outliers. Obviously scum wants a no-lynch.

On September 20 2011 09:20 Curu wrote:


Look at how fiercely he was defending sinani. Stupid move for scum.

He also proposed the scum-among-us idea for the 3 Mason circle. Stupid move for scum.

On September 20 2011 10:23 Nisani201 wrote:

It's mini mafia, so yes I can have one scumread. I would like to see Erandorr post more when he gets the chance, though.

On September 20 2011 10:59 Forumite wrote:
Nisani came out to defend me, Curu came out to try to get me lynched on a weak case. That´s why I think nisani is Town.

Not quite following here, Nisani said we shouldn´t trust blindly, he was accepting the possibility of scum among the Cutie Mark Crusaders, you however made the case that there MUST be a scum among us 3, and pushed for my lynch solely based on that. There´s nothing guaranteeing that there must be a scum among us, unless you know for a fact, by being one yourself. That´s why your case looks against me looks weird, and somewhat scummy.

----

Of the remaining players, I´m most interested in Greymist. Just a feeling, mostly it´s him being wishy-washy and fitting in yesterday. I´ll see if there is any real evidence to back it up.

On September 20 2011 11:15 Forumite wrote:
I guess scum thought Greymist was looking more Town than I did.

Okay, let´s assume there´s one scum among us. Why me and not you?

Still waiting for tnkted to make the report he promised us.

Also, someone cockroleblocked me tonight.

On September 20 2011 11:35 Jackal58 wrote:

You're doing it wrong.
##VOTE: Forumite

On September 21 2011 04:06 Nisani201 wrote:
Sigh, I guess I'll have to write an analysis on WBG when I get home today. So like, in a few hours.

On September 21 2011 06:14 Nisani201 wrote:

This post does not make sense, if Forumite and Cury are mafia, then I must be mafia too (unless GM is epic trolling me). You're starting to get to dangerously close to WBG's level.

On September 21 2011 07:15 Nisani201 wrote:
OK, this is getting ridiculous. WBG, you're off the hook for now.

##Unvote

##Vote: Cyber_Cheese

On September 21 2011 07:18 Nisani201 wrote:

<3 you too

On September 21 2011 15:41 Forumite wrote:

Are you sure it´s Honesty that you want? Honesty has allready been completed and is either in the hands of tnkted or Jackal. I think Kindness, and perhaps one other, is distributed as pieces right now, but Honesty is complete.

On September 21 2011 23:53 tnkted wrote:
Ummm.....


Wtf? This coming from the guy who took a HUGE amount of heat the other day for misclaiming his pm timing?



Why anyone other than us? I don't see any obvious reasons at all.

On September 21 2011 23:59 Nisani201 wrote:
WBG, I was under just as much pressure as you when I mistakenly claimed having Honesty. You keep spewing out more bullshit, it's actually quite amazing.

On September 22 2011 00:09 tnkted wrote:


No its not but it is an indicator that his 'scumslip' was an honest mistake and not a scumslip at all. Which makes him look more town.

I'll remind you that I felt the same way about you until I recieved the pieces of honesty from yall, which made me feel that YOU were more town. People who have lived in glass houses and who have had stones thrown at them shouldn't throw stones at their neighbors on glass street.

Er, my metaphor kind of ran away from me there, but you get the point.

And alright nisani, we just have to wait for GM to send me a PM telling me what's what. In the meantime, ##Unvote.

While we wait though, I want jackal's opinion on scum and on what we should do tonight with the items.

I propose that (since we can't communicate at night) we use wifom to keep mafia from hitting us. It worked last night, since greymyst died instead of one of the two of us. Mafia knows that we can either protect the other one, or ourselves, and that we will probably do one of them. If mafia hits either of us then town knows that mafia knew who was going to be protected, so they knew it was safe to hit that person. Town then lynches the other one for revealing whats what.

So we are probably safe. Just to make sure, and to make sure that scum can't roleblock or steal from the person WITH the items, I propose that we use the same principle of wifom to switch the items around. Let do something like, if by a certain time I don't send you my items, you send yours to me. Mafia won't know which one of us has them since we didn't post anything in thread, but the two of us will know. Then, right before the nightpost, one of us posts what happend.


Thoughts?

On September 22 2011 00:18 tnkted wrote:
Bugs, what about this aren't you getting? We're about to find out if he was lying or not. We are putting your theory to the test. How is that not a good thing for town?

On September 22 2011 00:19 Nisani201 wrote:
OK, I've had enough of this. WBG is being anti-town by criticizing EVERYTHING that's happening. Even if he is not scum, he still needs to die for his hostile behavior.

##Unvote
##Vote: wherebugsgo

On September 22 2011 00:28 tnkted wrote:



Yes, but if the piece he sends me is truely the element of generosity, then he wasn't caught lying, fake breadcrumbing, OR not reading the thread. He was caught making a mistake.

YOU DID THE SAME THING EARLIER THIS GAME, HOW CAN YOU GIVE HIM SHIT FOR IT?!

Am I out of my mind? What the hell is happening? Am I not explaining this correctly?

On September 22 2011 03:34 Nisani201 wrote:
I breadcrumbed because I did not know if there was a specific person who was told that they needed the element. If I said HEY GUISE I GOTZ DA ELEMENT WHO WANTS IT HURRRR, then scum might ask for it. But breadcrumbing it would only make sense to the person who needed it (however obviously this got severely messed up because I was breadcrumbing the wrong element).

Mind explaining my other "contradictions"?

On September 20 2011 01:39 Nisani201 wrote:
Ok, what the fuck? How did we get a no-lynch?

I'm on my iPod right now so I can't navigate as quickly, but I am putting big FoS on the outliers. Obviously scum wants a no-lynch.

On September 20 2011 05:59 Nisani201 wrote:

I explained in thread why I wasn't around yesterday. And lurkers aren't killing the game, the no-lynch that YOU CAUSED is killing this game.

On September 20 2011 09:04 Nisani201 wrote:

Sorry, that was poorly worded. I meant people who were voting for someone with otherwise no votes.

On September 21 2011 04:06 Nisani201 wrote:
Sigh, I guess I'll have to write an analysis on WBG when I get home today. So like, in a few hours.

On September 21 2011 23:39 Nisani201 wrote:
gahhh i messed it up

##Unvote
##Vote: Jackal58

I've found confirmed scum, and you're voting for Forumite?

OK WBG, my top 3 scum suspects, just for you: Jackal, WBG, and Cyber_Cheese.

On September 21 2011 23:44 Nisani201 wrote:
OK, when I died and flip Town, you had better kill Jackal. I have confirmed scum and you're voting for the wrong person.

On September 21 2011 23:51 Nisani201 wrote:
Giving the element to Jackal, hang on guys.

On September 21 2011 23:52 Nisani201 wrote:
omg the posts are coming in so quickly, giving it to tnkted instead.

On September 22 2011 00:19 Nisani201 wrote:
OK, I've had enough of this. WBG is being anti-town by criticizing EVERYTHING that's happening. Even if he is not scum, he still needs to die for his hostile behavior.

##Unvote
##Vote: wherebugsgo

On September 22 2011 03:57 Forumite wrote:

Setting the facts straight: I got my piece of Honesty with the Day 1 post, not with the rolepost, it was around a realtime day between those.

On September 22 2011 04:04 Nisani201 wrote:
Uh oh, you've suffered from Filter Syndrome. Again. This is annoying, and I'm not even going to bother defending myself against this because of how much bullshit it is.

I guess I will have to write an analysis against you. Really, I shouldn't have to convince people that you're scum, but unfortunately it's come to that.

On September 22 2011 04:10 Lucidity wrote:
Don't even bother. Unless you want another no lynch.

TODAY WE LYNCH FORUMITE / JACKAL / CURU

WBG: Go look at Cyber_Cheese's posts. And DAD's. How are you not attacking him, but going after Nisani instead? The former takes trolling/bad town play/whatthewhat to a whole new level.

On September 22 2011 04:15 Lucidity wrote:
If there is even the hint of a no lynch tonight please just lynch me. I'm over this town.

And I realise my frustration has caused me to also play badly. Just derp.

@Everyone: State your opinions on

FORUMITE

JACKAL

CURU

On September 22 2011 04:33 Lucidity wrote:
@WBG: I don't think Nisani has acted more scummy than other derpers. Look at your own case. You say that he contradicted himself by calling Jackal scum and then giving the element to Jackal. But he called him scum when he thought Jackal was lying about the element of honesty. ONLY AFTER he realised he had Generosity and Jackal wasn't scum for having Honesty did he consider giving it to him.

On September 21 2011 22:24 Nisani201 wrote:
If there isn't a specific person who needs it then I will give it to tnkted or Jackal.

On September 22 2011 04:47 Lucidity wrote:
Are you reading his filter or the thread? Read the thread and it becomes quite clear what happened.

He wanted to give it to one of them. THen Jackal said he already had Honest and voted Nisani. Then Nisani thought Jackal was scum for fake claiming it. Then he realised he derped and said he'd give it to Jackal again. Make sense?

I'm trying to point out to you that you're tunneling. And I think you're tunneling anti/bad town play instead of pro scum.

On September 22 2011 04:54 Lucidity wrote:

Forumite is confirmed scum at this point.

If he believed he had the element of Honesty. And Jackal comes into the thread and says he has it. He's obviously going to jump right on that shit and vote Jackal. How is that not obvious?

Explain the logic to me if he were scum. How does his actions make any sense as scum?

On September 22 2011 04:55 Nisani201 wrote:
You are definitely getting an analysis. Yesterday I was distracted by Cyber_cheese so I did not write it, however I will not let that happen this time.

On September 22 2011 04:57 Lucidity wrote:
READ THE THREAD

On September 22 2011 05:00 Lucidity wrote:
That was @Forumite.
ERM?

I deleted the rest of the post because it's nonsense. You're telling me you don't have any scum reads? By Day 3?

I would be absolutely over the moon if you could be lynched today. Too bad Greymist died last night for suggesting we lynch you to confirm tnkted. I don't think anyone else sees how uninterested you are in hunting scum.

On September 22 2011 05:11 Lucidity wrote:

They are still both scummy. If one flips scum the other suddenly looks much more town, but until then???

On September 22 2011 05:16 Lucidity wrote:

That makes no sense as scum.

Jackal AND tnkted claim that they have the element. So trying to go after Jackal alone is silly. Furthermore, they actually used the stone and got my name, WITH the "confused" part, which I didn't claim in thread. Coming late to the party and claiming to have Honesty and that that makes Jackal scum is RETARDED.

Not only that, but the setup is all wrong. He didn't claim his element and call Jackal scum. He claimed his element and then it had to be pointed out by OTHERS that Honesty was already out there.

And don't come with this "herp derp he never read the thread so that's why he tried the gambit". If Nisani is scum he's in a scum TEAM. They would have worked on the plan together. There's no way he would've fucked up like that. There's no way that plan would've even left the QT.

Sorry, but you are attacking a derping townie, not someone playing pro scum. This is seriously eating at me now.

On September 22 2011 05:17 Erandorr wrote:


wow thanks lucidity, that is what I wrote earlier too ! Lets kill forumite, yes? yes!

On September 22 2011 05:24 Erandorr wrote:


I never did. I pushed forumite from the start, stoped morons/scum from lynching nisani overly quickly and then decided after that that its time to kill forimite. Either you read the thread really carelessly or you are intentionnaly shitting up everything.

On September 22 2011 05:25 Erandorr wrote:


How is that tunnel you seem to be living in these days?

On September 22 2011 05:26 Lucidity wrote:
Curu has defended Nisani and voted Forumite as well.

Is he part of our scum team too? Oh boy, we are 4. We are in LyLo! <3

On September 22 2011 05:28 Lucidity wrote:

It is when you ignore any responses to it.

On September 22 2011 05:42 Lucidity wrote:

I'm the one saying that's bad town, not pro scum. I'm not ignoring anything.

On September 22 2011 05:45 Lucidity wrote:
WBG, should I mention how you're the one ignoring how Nisani considered lynching through the CMCs to find the scum among them. Or how he helped Forumite out of a tough spot by confirming his claim, when scum could have let us stone him (The only way Nisani is scum there is if both are scum)?

On September 22 2011 05:47 Lucidity wrote:

This entire town is bad town. So clearly we can't go that route.

@Curu: So let's do it.