EPTCosmic Horror Mafia - Page 14
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
tnkted
United States1359 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
As for me, I´m now considering Tnkted to be just as scummy as Cyber, but hiding it better. He is also a veteran player, Cyber can be excused as this is his first game, and I don´t like lynching a player on the first day in his first game. I also feel like there are more connections between Tnkted and other players, this is a weak scumtell but it´s the one thing I was missing when looking at Cyber. ##Unvote ##Vote Tnkted | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
someone hammer it so we can move on without extending the day. ##Unvote ##Vote tnkted | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 25 2011 20:32 Palmar wrote: I'd rather lynch almost everyone in this town than him. On August 25 2011 22:29 Palmar wrote: screw it, at least he can't call me mafia. someone hammer it so we can move on without extending the day. ##Unvote ##Vote tnkted Palmar, of all players in this game, you looked like the last one that would switch your vote, what changed your mind? | ||
|
tnkted
United States1359 Posts
I'm agreeing with the change of heart about cyber_cheese. His response to pressure was to realize how scummy he was acting and to then try to change his ways. So, ##unvote and ##vote: Palmar. I've got a series of meetings coming up that will take most of the day, punctured with brief breaks where I can read and catch up on the thread, but I probably won't have time to really post any big ol posts, just a few one-liners. For when I flip green: Probably Town players: Erandorr cyber_cheese Navillus Scummy players: Wiggles Palmar eii JeeJee Forumite | ||
|
tnkted
United States1359 Posts
gl town | ||
|
tnkted
United States1359 Posts
| ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
tnkted
United States1359 Posts
I'm used to voting in a separate thread, where formatting doesn't matter as much :x | ||
|
tnkted
United States1359 Posts
##vote palmar | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On August 25 2011 22:34 Forumite wrote: Palmar, of all players in this game, you looked like the last one that would switch your vote, what changed your mind? Ferryman has a good argument. People don't listen to good arguments because they're afraid of being wrong. I just spent XLIV presenting good arguments only to be ignored so people could kill some townies who are obviously town but make silly mistakes. All I got for that performance was people hating me or thinking I'm scum because I was right, and I told them they were wrong. I don't think tnkted is scum, but whatever, someone else can take the responsibility of convincing us to do the right thing. If there is ANY chance we can switch to wiggles, that's what I want to do. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
I have a new strategy, I'll never vote for people I think are town. I'll actually force a no-lynch over it. I'm just not going to spam the thread away trying to convince people I'm right. ##Unvote tnkted ##Vote Mr. Wiggles | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 25 2011 22:39 tnkted wrote: Hear, hear!I'm used to voting in a separate thread, where formatting doesn't matter as much :x On August 25 2011 23:01 Palmar wrote: Right... I have a new strategy, I'll never vote for people I think are town. I'll actually force a no-lynch over it. I'm just not going to spam the thread away trying to convince people I'm right. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On August 25 2011 23:07 Forumite wrote: Right... What's your reasoning to believe Wiggles is town? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
Tnkted is not scum because of this tiny little exchange. Thing is, the lololo thing is too unforced, too reactive and too casual for him to possibly be scum. If he was scum, he'd know I was town and be a little more hesitant to take my "derp" as an admission of slipping up (whereas, it's real intention was to portray the silliness of the accusation upon tnkted). If he's scum he's really good scum. I don't think he'd ever do what he did there as scum. He could have pushed the same issue, trying to paint my joke as a slip, but he would have gone about it completely differently if he was scum. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 25 2011 23:15 Palmar wrote: What's your reasoning to believe Wiggles is town? I don´t trust the primary argument made against him. Meta is usefull, sometimes, but I don´t think it´s applicable in finding a new kind of 3rd party with an unknown optimal play, especially as the meta argument focused specifically on his first post, which wanted to start a discussion more than anything. Since then wiggles has sometimes overreacted in his defences, there might be something there, but some players has said that Wiggles is hard to read, and I´m prepared to trust that Meta more than what Ferryman brought up. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On August 25 2011 23:36 Forumite wrote: I don´t trust the primary argument made against him. Meta is usefull, sometimes, but I don´t think it´s applicable in finding a new kind of 3rd party with an unknown optimal play, especially as the meta argument focused specifically on his first post, which wanted to start a discussion more than anything. Since then wiggles has sometimes overreacted in his defences, there might be something there, but some players has said that Wiggles is hard to read, and I´m prepared to trust that Meta more than what Ferryman brought up. Then take a look at some of the things that have happened in the game. Wiggles decided to vote Eiii in his opening post. There is nothing wrong with randomly voting, but the fact that he felt the need to specify it was a pressure vote (through linking an awesome song by bowie/queen), shows inherent signs of guilt, and not wanting to stick his neck out. I don't even understand what the purpose of voting someone with the intent of only pressuring would be. At he point in time he threw down that vote it'd have been more sensical to go after one of the players that have posted, or to simply claim the vote on Eiii was to get rid of lurkers. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 25 2011 23:33 Palmar wrote: Actually, fuck it, I hate losing. Tnkted is not scum because of this tiny little exchange. Thing is, the lololo thing is too unforced, too reactive and too casual for him to possibly be scum. If he was scum, he'd know I was town and be a little more hesitant to take my "derp" as an admission of slipping up (whereas, it's real intention was to portray the silliness of the accusation upon tnkted). If he's scum he's really good scum. I don't think he'd ever do what he did there as scum. He could have pushed the same issue, trying to paint my joke as a slip, but he would have gone about it completely differently if he was scum. At first it looked like that, an easygoing joke-vote, but this dance has kept going, you and Tnkted have kept voting on eachother, and pushed weak cases, then later on backtracked to defend the other if it gets too strong. Make up your mind. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On August 25 2011 23:41 Palmar wrote: Then take a look at some of the things that have happened in the game. Wiggles decided to vote Eiii in his opening post. There is nothing wrong with randomly voting, but the fact that he felt the need to specify it was a pressure vote (through linking an awesome song by bowie/queen), shows inherent signs of guilt, and not wanting to stick his neck out. I don't even understand what the purpose of voting someone with the intent of only pressuring would be. At he point in time he threw down that vote it'd have been more sensical to go after one of the players that have posted, or to simply claim the vote on Eiii was to get rid of lurkers. There´s nothing weird about a pressure vote. Stating that it´s for pressure isn´t bad either, Eiii still has to respond, and Wiggles doesn´t have to answer to people who use that vote as an argument that he´s aggressively trying to lynch at random. I don´t find anything especially scummy about a pressure vote. Also, I like that song. | ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i56.tinypic.com/20a7ypk.jpg) Voting list at the time of this post + Show Spoiler + tnkted (5) chaos13 Cyber_Cheese Jackal58 Eiii Forumite Cyber_Cheese (3) Sevryn Erandorr JeeJee Mr. Wiggles (2) TheFerryman Palmar Eiii (1) Mr. Wiggles Palmar (1) tnkted Not voted Navillus The required majority of 7 has not been reached before the deadline. EXTENSION was used. Which means Navillus also gets stay of mercy. The NEW and FINAL deadline is August 26 2011 23:46 KST, which is 14:46 GMT (+00:00) | ||
| ||
