Resurrection Mafia - Page 3

On September 03 2011 06:23 Palmar wrote:
he voted for chaos13: I'll just say this now, I can't conclude chaos13's alignment. Like, I think he's town but someone else needs to pick up the slack. I simply can't know his alignment because his play is illogical.

On September 03 2011 07:53 sandroba wrote:
What? A little while back you criticised the silly bandwagon forming on varp and now you are voting for him? Why not on the way more useless and non contributory ON? You said yourself that you didn't want to double lynch day1 and even sugested we used our priest to revive one of the lynches. What is anti-town about his idea of lynching the scummiest lurker + a normal lynch?
The very good analysis you are refering to is basically redFF saying one of the first posts on the thread is non contributory and appearing to be pro-town. He pointed out that he did so as scum in a previous game, in which he got lynched day 1 for it. If you are judging only meta from his very first post, do you really think he would do the same shit again? Or do you think it's more likely that despite the risk of getting lynched he was legimately concerned about spamming/lurking/trolling going on in the recent tl games?

On September 01 2011 21:43 bumatlarge wrote:
Ill talk about wherebugsgo later today. Let's say I'd make him out to be similar to sandroba in terms of intelligence

On September 02 2011 11:36 bumatlarge wrote:


We should be reading more into the role list we have. This is an extremely odd set-up where lynching and killing is not completely based around eliminating scum. In fact, basing our tactics on that is short-sighted and I mean to remedy this.

Dead players create a "pool" of suspects that a coroner can utilize. I am fairly certain we have 1 or 2 coroners, or else the game has a ridiculous set-up. In a way, the first lynch is really important, yet not as cruel with the Resurrection mechanic. We immediately lynch two players, and the coroner(s) must choose between them. I don't see how intentionally misleading roles like millers or sanity can be in this game, so I'm assuming what a coroner get's is 100%. So this is what I'm thinking, and I'm sure I haven't been the first person to speculate.

If we have an unlynchable claim, and we put a few votes on him along with someone else we deem scummy, we can economically manage our now chaotic lynching power into something very useful and organized at this point in the game. The priest and coroner can double team the other dead person and hold on to what they get. Most likely the unlynchable will get shot, and the high priest can devote his power in keeping that person alive, while the coroner can go to town, and if mafia ever stop shooting the unlynchable, we get a confirmed town.

Its extremely unlikely for mafia to have an unlynchable themselves without town having a direct counter to such shenanigans. Think about it, that one mafia member would have to be shot by the unlynchable, or he wins the game by himself. There are multiple loopholes to this plan, like perhaps a 1 lynch immune mafia that could "prove" himself, or perhaps a mafia watcher who can see who visits a dead person (goodbye priest and coroner :X)

Thoughts on this? Also varpulis wagon is hilarious, though I'm not taking my eyes off him, the fact that that many people gunned on him from the little thing I picked up without questioning everything else gives us some great partners for unlynchable if this can follow through. I mean at worst mafia figures out who they can't push a lynch on?

Can a High Priest revive the same person more then once?

On September 02 2011 11:47 bumatlarge wrote:


It is a compliment, read XLIV, he nailed me role and alignment, but I can't say more then that, figure it out yourself

##Unvote varpulis

I still find it likely that varpulis can be scum (redff has made good points), but in the event that he is not, I would look heavily into these people, in order of scuminess IMO.

Kenpachi - FoSing redff then voting varp. Every game I reset what I think kenpachi would do as each alignment. In this instance he's given more then he usually does, and it stands out as illogical even for kenpachi.

Palmar - For once jumping on a wagon rather then making his own 8 billion reasons. This stands out.

redff - Seems completely legitimate, but he is capable of such a ploy as scum. He's bottom tier in this.

So Kenpachi > Varp > Palmar > redff.
##Vote Kenpachi

On September 01 2011 11:05 OriginalName wrote:


...Meta lynching? Reals?

On September 02 2011 15:40 OriginalName wrote:
Where the fuck are Drazerk and Sknowman?

Also the one thing I've noticed from posting today is Kenpachis vanilla claim. Firstly why do it? He's trying to establish townieness then basically asks a few questions then completely drops off the face of the earth. Nothing else seems to come out of him and I personally don't mind offing him.

Also along with the above the last time he claimed townie and lurked he flipped scum.

So in recap:

For shitposting and meta I vote

##Vote: Kenpachi

On September 03 2011 09:23 OriginalName wrote:


We dont know that for sure. Settle down there is probably more going on right now than is clear to us.

On September 03 2011 10:42 wherebugsgo wrote:


-_-

What analysis? You just tunneled them to hell.

Why do you suspect bum/ON and palmar?

On September 03 2011 13:28 wherebugsgo wrote:


The thread is chock full of null tells right now, how many times do I have to say this?

The only exceptions are you and chaos13, and honestly that's not difficult to see now.

On September 03 2011 22:56 sandroba wrote:
redFF you are most likely town because now that I think about it there is no way you could know that the coroner is dead and you would risk being insta counter claimed by the real coroner and thus get lynched if you were mafia. That being said please don't make the same mistake again spamming the thread and getting a townie killed. Read wbg defense. Unless he is the master of deceit, he is very unlikely to be mafia. Please put your vote somewhere more productive.