EPTResurrection Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On September 01 2011 12:31 sinani206 wrote: /confirm Meta and policies aren't a good enough case for a lynch right now. The subject of Varpulis was a nice way to start discussion, but there's no need to tunnel. All of redFF's posts, however are very short and tangential, except for his analysis of Varpulis that was based entirely on meta. FoS redFF. this is not a good reason to fos and actually makes little to no sense. current scumteam imo=varpulis, sinani, ace if i had to name it right now. i have ON as town, going out see ya guys later. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On September 02 2011 02:32 Varpulis wrote: These are WBG's only 2 posts in game, barring a question to the host. I know you can do better than this. Step it up and contribute. NO U MAFIA On September 02 2011 03:53 sandroba wrote: Okay, I've read the thread now and it's shit. Let's not lynch varpulis now because it's dumb. Everyone is jumping on this silly bandwagon without any evidence at all. Omg he posted a "useless" post when there was nothing to talk about yet, he must be scum trolololol. Read what Ace said, he knows his shit. No sense in posting responding to every and each single post of this thread, collect your thoughts and post them all toghether neatly. @redFF why do you think ON is town? He has a 2 posts that don't say much. It's funny you say that because him and bum are on the top of my watch list right now. I was just giving reads, mainly gut. his reaction to my post on varp seemed more genuine and towny than varp's or ace's. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
scum. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
SINANI SINCE UR HERE WHO ARE YOUR SCUMREADS. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On September 02 2011 12:00 bumatlarge wrote: It wouldn't be a waste of a lynch, it would technically be a no lynch with a free check and a confirmed unlynchable. But since the unlynchable can only be revived once its better to wait at least one more day. The first two people are going to get revived anyway. You don't think the high priest should revive day 1? I dont think the high priest should revive varpulis day 1 because he's mafia. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On September 02 2011 14:37 sinani206 wrote: I'm sorry, I though it would be obvious that I knew that you thought I could be scum. I have acknowledged this in previous posts. Anyway, redFF just keeps feeling more and more scummy to me. I will put my vote on him for now. ##Vote: redFF PS: I know you think I'm not contributing too. I'm explicitly acknowledging this so that you don't think that I'm disregarding it. LOL. im sorry but that is the worst post in the game so far. this guy and varp are the lynches. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On September 03 2011 01:40 sinani206 wrote: Meh. I'm the first suspect in this game too, it seems. Anyway, I can see that I'm not going to get a case for redFF going, so I'm going to change to bumatlarge, who was my next suspect anyway. ##Vote: bumatlarge erm if you actually had a case for either of us then maybe, but u cant just say this person is scummy im voting him with no reasoning. mafia. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On September 03 2011 06:47 sandroba wrote: Let's not lynch sinani, he is scummy despite alignment and I don't see anything that jumps scum in his posts so far. Let's lynch Bum and ON gogogo consolidate fast. -_- | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On September 03 2011 04:10 Varpulis wrote: Alright, It looks like trying to convince you guys not to lynch me is a lost cause (admittedly i did a pretty poor job to begin with, but that's beside the point) I'm going to filter everybody and give my brief opinions on them. They won't be taken seriously now, i know, but hopefully they'll have more weight when a coroner checks me, which should happen eventually. The people saying that we shouldn't revive lynches are right. If scum want a lynch back, let them do it themselves. Zombies are temporary, so unless they're as scummy as scummy can be, lynching them night not be necessary. If they're increasing kp, by all means lynch lynch lynch, but if you believe mafia to have, for example, 3 players left, a zombie won't actually increase their kp, so you might as well just wait for them to die. High priest should be reviving night kills, because those are far more likely to be town. Without further ado, my reads: Jackal58 + Show Spoiler + leaning green, but there's not much to go on. he's playing his usual style as far as i can tell, and the reasoning behind his vote is relatively sound. RedFF + Show Spoiler + He's wrong, but he's not mafia. His suspicion and application of pressure and moderate tunneling are both pro town and effective. Sknowman + Show Spoiler + lurky, but his one post is good and informative. Not sure, leaning town. Kenpachi + Show Spoiler + no fucking clue, as usual. Wherebugsgo + Show Spoiler + scummy. Most of his posts are talking about mechanics and plans, aka "hey look i'm contributing without actually taking a stance or giving reads." Then he jumps on ace, who's as much lynch bait as i am at this point. sinani206 + Show Spoiler + also scummy. Soft defends me and then votes redFF with the explanation "he's scummy." When that doesn't work he jumps on the bumatlarge wagon again with the explanation "he's scummy." No explanation, nothing. Keep a close eye on this guy. Drazerk + Show Spoiler + lurky. Only 2 posts in the game, votes sinani, which i agree with. needs to post more. jcarlsoniv + Show Spoiler + i've got a town read on him, based on his attitude, activity, and the content of his posts. I don't see the scum motives in his posting, but this is more of a gut read than anything else Ace + Show Spoiler + had some early posts that weren't too bad, then started trolling with his journal. Null read, would like to see him actually contribute. A player who trolls even when asked to stop is a liability. OriginalName + Show Spoiler + Doesn't like meta lynching, votes Kenpachi on meta (???). contradiction, scummy. Needs to post more Palmar + Show Spoiler + Strong town. considers multiple points of view, and is able to step out of tunnel vision and make objective decisions. Filter him if you need any more convincing Chaos13 + Show Spoiler + wishy washy as hell. Not taking risks, votes palmar because Palmar was mean to him (aka didn't listen to his atmosphere post) Leaning scum bumatlarge + Show Spoiler + votes me because i made a "useless post" when there was nothing to discuss or post about. Unvotes with literally the same clause as redff (I still think he's scum, but let's lynch somebody else) Makes little sense to me. votes kenpachi on meta. I disagree with his posts about the high priest always reviving lynches. tl;dr the following people are scummy: WBG sinani206 Chaos13 bumatlarge Out of that pool, I'd like to lynch either sinani or bum. I'll look at the vote counts (I think i'll have to look through manually, but whatever) then make my decision with a proper accusation. THIS GUY IS SO MAFIA ITS FUCKING RIDICULOUS HOLY SHIT WHY IS HE NOT LEADING VOTES BY A COLOSSAL MARGIN. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On September 03 2011 05:13 Ace wrote: ## vote chaos13 Let chaos reign! THIS IS RETARDED. VARP SINANI SCUM OBV. This game is so dumb, on why are you voting kenpachi you know better than that. | ||
| ||
